Agility and search and rescue training differently affects pet dogs’ behaviour in socio-cognitive tasks

Both genetic factors and life experiences appear to be important in shaping dogs' responses in a test situation. One potentially highly relevant life experience may be the dog's training history, however few studies have investigated this aspect so far. This paper briefly reviews studies focusing on the effects of training on dogs' performance in cognitive tasks, and presents new, preliminary evidence on trained and untrained pet dogs' performance in an 'unsolvable task'. Thirty-nine adult dogs: 13 trained for search and rescue activities (S&R group), 13 for agility competition (Agility group) and 13 untrained pets (Pet group) were tested. Three 'solvable' trials in which dogs could obtain the food by manipulating a plastic container were followed by an 'unsolvable' trial in which obtaining the food became impossible. The dogs' behaviours towards the apparatus and the people present (owner and researcher) were analysed. Both in the first 'solvable' and in the 'unsolvable' trial the groups were comparable on actions towards the apparatus, however differences emerged in their human-directed gazing behaviour. In fact, results in the 'solvable' trial, showed fewer S&R dogs looking back at a person compared to agility dogs, and the latter alternating their gaze between person and apparatus more frequently than pet dogs. In the unsolvable trial no difference between groups emerged in the latency to look at the person however agility dogs looked longer at the owner than both pet and S&R dogs; whereas S&R dogs exhibited significantly more barking (always occurring concurrently to looking at the person or the apparatus) than both other groups. Furthermore, S&R dogs alternated their gaze between person and apparatus more than untrained pet dogs, with agility dogs falling in between these two groups. Thus overall, it seems that the dogs' human-directed communicative behaviours are significantly influenced by their individual training experiences.

[1]  Florence Gaunet,et al.  How do guide dogs of blind owners and pet dogs of sighted owners (Canis familiaris) ask their owners for food? , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[2]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  The Domestication of Social Cognition in Dogs , 2002, Science.

[3]  Ádám Miklósi,et al.  Social learning in dogs: the effect of a human demonstrator on the performance of dogs in a detour task , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  K. Svartberg,et al.  Breed-typical behaviour in dogs—Historical remnants or recent constructs? , 2006 .

[5]  Ludwig Huber,et al.  Obey or not obey? Dogs (Canis familiaris) behave differently in response to attentional states of their owners. , 2006, Journal of comparative psychology.

[6]  M. Tomasello,et al.  The early ontogeny of human–dog communication , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  The pet dogs ability for learning from a human demonstrator in a detour task is independent from the breed and age , 2005 .

[8]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  A Simple Reason for a Big Difference Wolves Do Not Look Back at Humans, but Dogs Do , 2003, Current Biology.

[9]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Comparative social cognition: what can dogs teach us? , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  Paola Valsecchi,et al.  Does training make you smarter? The effects of training on dogs’ performance (Canis familiaris) in a problem solving task , 2008, Behavioural Processes.

[11]  Alexandra Horowitz,et al.  Attention to attention in domestic dog (Canis familiaris) dyadic play , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[12]  A. Luescher Diagnosis and management of compulsive disorders in dogs and cats. , 2003, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice.

[13]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Domestic Dogs (Canis familiaris) Use Human and Conspecific Social Cues to Locate Hidden Food , 1999 .

[14]  B. Hare,et al.  Social Cognitive Evolution in Captive Foxes Is a Correlated By-Product of Experimental Domestication , 2005, Current Biology.

[15]  Thomas D. Sambrook,et al.  Use of human-given cues by domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) and horses (Equus caballus) , 2000, Animal Cognition.

[16]  S. Marshall-Pescini,et al.  Is your choice my choice? The owners’ effect on pet dogs’ (Canis lupus familiaris) performance in a food choice task , 2007, Animal Cognition.

[17]  J. Serpell,et al.  Breed differences in canine aggression , 2008 .

[18]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans. , 2003, Journal of comparative psychology.

[19]  V. Csányi,et al.  Intentional behaviour in dog-human communication: an experimental analysis of “showing” behaviour in the dog , 2000, Animal Cognition.

[20]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  A comparative analysis of animals' understanding of the human pointing gesture , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[21]  Thomas Suddendorf,et al.  Do dogs (Canis familiaris) understand invisible displacement? , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[22]  M. Tomasello Joint attention as social cognition. , 1995 .

[23]  Márta Gácsi,et al.  Comprehension of human pointing gestures in young human-reared wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs (Canis familiaris) , 2008, Animal Cognition.

[24]  C. Wynne,et al.  Wolves outperform dogs in following human social cues , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  Stephen E. G. Lea,et al.  Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fail to show understanding of means-end connections in a string-pulling task , 2004, Animal Cognition.

[26]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Communication of Food Location Between Human and Dog ( Canis Familiaris ) , 1998 .

[27]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Reproducing human actions and action sequences: “Do as I Do!” in a dog , 2006, Animal Cognition.

[28]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Dogs (Canis familiaris) learn from their owners via observation in a manipulation task. , 2003, Journal of comparative psychology.

[29]  Michael Tomasello,et al.  Human-like social skills in dogs? , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  Angel M. Elgier,et al.  Effect of reinforcement, reinforcer omission and extinction on a communicative response in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) , 2008, Behavioural Processes.

[31]  L. Huber,et al.  Selective Imitation in Domestic Dogs , 2007, Current Biology.

[32]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs , 1998, Animal Cognition.

[33]  Jonathan J. Cooper,et al.  Clever hounds: social cognition in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris) , 2003 .

[34]  G. Thines,et al.  Behavioural processes , 1976, Behavioural Processes.

[35]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Verbal attention getting as a key factor in social learning between dog (Canis familiaris) and human. , 2004, Journal of comparative psychology.

[36]  C. Wynne,et al.  Ontogeny's impacts on human–dog communication , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  F. K. Ramsey,et al.  In A Dog , 1957 .

[38]  C. Moore,et al.  Joint attention : its origins and role in development , 1995 .