Estimation of functional connectivity in fMRI data using stability selection-based sparse partial correlation with elastic net penalty

Characterizing interactions between multiple brain regions is important for understanding brain function. Functional connectivity measures based on partial correlation provide an estimate of the linear conditional dependence between brain regions after removing the linear influence of other regions. Estimation of partial correlations is, however, difficult when the number of regions is large, as is now increasingly the case with a growing number of large-scale brain connectivity studies. To address this problem, we develop novel methods for estimating sparse partial correlations between multiple regions in fMRI data using elastic net penalty (SPC-EN), which combines L1- and L2-norm regularization We show that L1-norm regularization in SPC-EN provides sparse interpretable solutions while L2-norm regularization improves the sensitivity of the method when the number of possible connections between regions is larger than the number of time points, and when pair-wise correlations between brain regions are high. An issue with regularization-based methods is choosing the regularization parameters which in turn determine the selection of connections between brain regions. To address this problem, we deploy novel stability selection methods to infer significant connections between brain regions. We also compare the performance of SPC-EN with existing methods which use only L1-norm regularization (SPC-L1) on simulated and experimental datasets. Detailed simulations show that the performance of SPC-EN, measured in terms of sensitivity and accuracy is superior to SPC-L1, especially at higher rates of feature prevalence. Application of our methods to resting-state fMRI data obtained from 22 healthy adults shows that SPC-EN reveals a modular architecture characterized by strong inter-hemispheric links, distinct ventral and dorsal stream pathways, and a major hub in the posterior medial cortex - features that were missed by conventional methods. Taken together, our findings suggest that SPC-EN provides a powerful tool for characterizing connectivity involving a large number of correlated regions that span the entire brain.

[1]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[2]  T. Adali,et al.  Latency (in)sensitive ICA Group independent component analysis of fMRI data in the temporal frequency domain , 2003, NeuroImage.

[3]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[4]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[5]  Radford M. Neal Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.

[6]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Applications of the lasso and grouped lasso to the estimation of sparse graphical models , 2010 .

[7]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  David C. Hoyle,et al.  Accuracy of Pseudo-Inverse Covariance Learning—A Random Matrix Theory Analysis , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  E. Bullmore,et al.  A Resilient, Low-Frequency, Small-World Human Brain Functional Network with Highly Connected Association Cortical Hubs , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Pablo Balenzuela,et al.  Modular Organization of Brain Resting State Networks in Chronic Back Pain Patients , 2010, Front. Neuroinform..

[11]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Measuring information integration , 2003, BMC Neuroscience.

[12]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Probabilistic Graphical Models - Principles and Techniques , 2009 .

[13]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .

[14]  Jing Li,et al.  Learning brain connectivity of Alzheimer's disease by sparse inverse covariance estimation , 2010, NeuroImage.

[15]  S. Sathiya Keerthi,et al.  A simple and efficient algorithm for gene selection using sparse logistic regression , 2003, Bioinform..

[16]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Advances and Pitfalls in the Analysis and Interpretation of Resting-State FMRI Data , 2010, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[17]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Altered Topological Properties of Functional Network Connectivity in Schizophrenia during Resting State: A Small-World Brain Network Study , 2011, PloS one.

[18]  H. Zou,et al.  Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net , 2005 .

[19]  M E J Newman,et al.  Modularity and community structure in networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Yong He,et al.  Disrupted small-world networks in schizophrenia. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  Moo K. Chung,et al.  Sparse Brain Network Recovery Under Compressed Sensing , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modelling , 2003, NeuroImage.

[23]  Lawrence Carin,et al.  Sparse multinomial logistic regression: fast algorithms and generalization bounds , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[24]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Network modelling methods for FMRI , 2011, NeuroImage.

[25]  Xiaoqi Huang,et al.  Disrupted Brain Connectivity Networks in Drug-Naive, First-Episode Major Depressive Disorder , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.

[26]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Six problems for causal inference from fMRI , 2010, NeuroImage.

[27]  V D Calhoun,et al.  Spatial and temporal independent component analysis of functional MRI data containing a pair of task‐related waveforms , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[28]  Pei Wang,et al.  Partial Correlation Estimation by Joint Sparse Regression Models , 2008, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[29]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Strong rules for discarding predictors in lasso‐type problems , 2010, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology.

[30]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. , 2010, Journal of statistical software.

[31]  Habib Benali,et al.  Using partial correlation to enhance structural equation modeling of functional MRI data. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[32]  Daniel L. Rubin,et al.  Network Analysis of Intrinsic Functional Brain Connectivity in Alzheimer's Disease , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[33]  Habib Benali,et al.  Partial correlation for functional brain interactivity investigation in functional MRI , 2006, NeuroImage.

[34]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Dynamic causal modeling , 2010, Scholarpedia.

[35]  Zhang Nanyin Uncovering intrinsic connectional architecture of functional networks in awake rat brain , 2011 .

[36]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[37]  Jean-Baptiste Poline,et al.  Brain covariance selection: better individual functional connectivity models using population prior , 2010, NIPS.

[38]  Lee M. Miller,et al.  Measuring interregional functional connectivity using coherence and partial coherence analyses of fMRI data , 2004, NeuroImage.

[39]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  PATHWISE COORDINATE OPTIMIZATION , 2007, 0708.1485.

[40]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  On the “degrees of freedom” of the lasso , 2007, 0712.0881.

[41]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[42]  O. Sporns,et al.  Mapping the Structural Core of Human Cerebral Cortex , 2008, PLoS biology.

[43]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  High-dimensional graphs and variable selection with the Lasso , 2006, math/0608017.

[44]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Stability selection , 2008, 0809.2932.

[45]  G. Glover,et al.  Spiral‐in/out BOLD fMRI for increased SNR and reduced susceptibility artifacts , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[46]  Anthony Randal McIntosh,et al.  Towards a network theory of cognition , 2000, Neural Networks.

[47]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[48]  Kaustubh Supekar,et al.  Sparse logistic regression for whole-brain classification of fMRI data , 2010, NeuroImage.

[49]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  Detection of functional connectivity using temporal correlations in MR images , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[50]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.

[51]  G. Deco,et al.  Emerging concepts for the dynamical organization of resting-state activity in the brain , 2010, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[52]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. , 2008, Biostatistics.

[53]  A. Cavanna,et al.  The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[54]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[55]  Tso-Jung Yen,et al.  Discussion on "Stability Selection" by Meinshausen and Buhlmann , 2010 .