A Saturable Transport Mechanism in the Intestinal Absorption of Gabapentin Is the Underlying Cause of the Lack of Proportionality Between Increasing Dose and Drug Levels in Plasma

Gabapentin (l-(aminomethyl)cyclohexaneacetic acid) is a neuroprotective agent with antiepileptic properties. The structure is small (molecular weight less than 200), is zwitterionic, and resembles an amino acid with the exception that it does not contain a chiral carbon and the amino group is not alpha to the carboxylate functionality. Gabapentin is not metabolized by humans, and thus, the amount of gabapentin excreted by the renal route represents the fraction of dose absorbed. Clinical trials have reported dose-dependent bioavailabilities ranging from 73.8 ± 18.3 to 35.7 ± 18.3% when the dose was increased from 100 to 1600 mg. The permeability of gabapentin in the rat intestinal perfusion system was consistent with carrier-mediated absorption, i.e., a 75 to 80% decrease in permeability when the drug concentration was increased from 0.01 to 50 mM (0.46 ± 0.05 to 0.12 ± 0.04). Excellent agreement was obtained between the actual clinical values and the predicted values from in situ results for the fraction of dose absorbed calculated using the theoretically derived correlation, Fabs = 1 - exp(−2Peff) by Ami-don et al. (Pharm. Res. 5:651–654, 1988). The permeability values obtained for gabapentin correspond to 67.4 and 30.2% of the dose absorbed at the low and high concentrations, respectively. In the everted rat intestinal ring system, gabapentin shared an inhibition profile similar to that of L-phenylalanine. Characteristics of gabapentin uptake included cross-inhibition with L-Phe, sensitivity to inhibition by L-Leu, stereoselectivity as evidenced by incomplete inhibition by D-Phe, and lack of effect by Gly. Our findings support absorption of gabapentin by a saturable pathway, system L, shared by the large hydrophobic amino acids, L-Phe and L-Leu. The saturable absorption pathway makes a major contribution to the lack of proportionality in plasma levels of drug with increasing dose ob-served in the clinic.

[1]  H. Christensen,et al.  Role of amino acid transport and countertransport in nutrition and metabolism. , 1990, Physiological reviews.

[2]  Patrick J. Sinko,et al.  Estimating Human Oral Fraction Dose Absorbed: A Correlation Using Rat Intestinal Membrane Permeability for Passive and Carrier-Mediated Compounds , 2004, Pharmaceutical Research.

[3]  D. Fleisher,et al.  Nutrient Influences on Rat Intestinal Phenytoin Uptake , 1989, Pharmaceutical Research.

[4]  M. Gibaldi,et al.  Drug transport. VI. Functional integrity of the rat everted small intestine with respect to passive transfer. , 1972, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[5]  G. Amidon,et al.  Uptake of prodrugs by rat intestinal mucosal cells: mechanism and pharmaceutical implications. , 1986, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[6]  D. S. Parsons,et al.  The gradient of mucosal surface area in the small intestine of the rat. , 1950, Journal of anatomy.

[7]  D. A. Johnson,et al.  Membrane permeability parameters for some amino acids and beta-lactam antibiotics: application of the boundary layer approach. , 1988, Journal of theoretical biology.

[8]  E. Wright,et al.  Multiple transport pathways for neutral amino acids in rabbit jejunal brush border vesicles , 1982, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[9]  T. Kawasaki,et al.  Characterization of amino-acid transport systems in guinea-pig intestinal brush-border membrane. , 1989, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[10]  E. U. Kölle,et al.  Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of gabapentin in rat, dog and man. , 1986, Arzneimittel-Forschung.

[11]  D. Matthews,et al.  Influx of two dipeptides, glycylsarcosine and L-glutamyl-L-glutamic acid, into hamster jejunum in vitro. , 1979, Clinical science.