Advertisement selection for online videos

The significant increase of the audience of video-sharing websites has attracted large investments on contextual advertising. In this paper we investigate alternative techniques for selecting ads to be placed in videos during their exhibitions. In order to improve the effectiveness of these ads avoiding the high cost of image processing, we explore textual metadata created by the users and stored in the page that hosts the video. Our proposal consists in assigning weights to the metadata attributes, according to their relative importance. To estimate such an importance, we apply a block importance model. Our experimental results show that the metadata attributes which perform better in the task of selecting ads are the ones that provide the best descriptions of the video content. We also observed that the application of weights according to the studied block importance model obtained gains of about 7\% over the selection method without weights. Such a gain is relevant due to the possibility of increasing the profitability of ad selection systems and avoiding the negative impact on advertiser brand and credibility of placing non-relevant ads.

[1]  Jung-Tae Lee,et al.  Contextual video advertising system using scene information inferred from video scripts , 2010, SIGIR.

[2]  Marcos André Gonçalves,et al.  Using structural information to improve search in Web collections , 2010 .

[3]  Ellen M. Voorhees,et al.  Retrieval evaluation with incomplete information , 2004, SIGIR '04.

[4]  Tao Mei,et al.  VideoSense: towards effective online video advertising , 2007, ACM Multimedia.

[5]  Michael A. Rappa,et al.  The utility business model and the future of computing services , 2004, IBM Syst. J..

[6]  Tao Mei,et al.  Contextual In-Stream Video Advertising , 2011 .

[7]  Hemant K. Bhargava,et al.  Paid placement strategies for internet search engines , 2002, WWW '02.

[8]  Hemant K. Bhargava,et al.  Implementing Sponsored Search in Web Search Engines: Computational Evaluation of Alternative Mechanisms , 2007, INFORMS J. Comput..

[9]  Weiguo Fan,et al.  Learning to advertise , 2006, SIGIR.

[10]  Flavio Figueiredo,et al.  Assessing the quality of textual features in social media , 2013, Inf. Process. Manag..

[11]  Flavio Figueiredo,et al.  Evidence of quality of textual features on the web 2.0 , 2009, CIKM.

[12]  David F. Gleich,et al.  SVD based term suggestion and ranking system , 2004, Fourth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM'04).

[13]  Flavio Figueiredo,et al.  On the Quality of Information for Web 2.0 Services , 2010, IEEE Internet Computing.

[14]  Berthier A. Ribeiro-Neto,et al.  Computing block importance for searching on web sites , 2007, CIKM '07.

[15]  Joshua Goodman,et al.  Finding advertising keywords on web pages , 2006, WWW '06.

[16]  Giovanni Giuffrida,et al.  An Apriori Based Approach to Improve On-line Advertising Performance , 2007, DMBiz@PAKDD.

[17]  Andrei Z. Broder,et al.  A semantic approach to contextual advertising , 2007, SIGIR.

[18]  Andrea Esuli,et al.  Best bets: thousands of queries in search of a client , 2004, WWW Alt. '04.

[19]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Content, Metadata, and Behavioral Information: Directions for Yahoo! Research , 2006, IEEE Data Eng. Bull..

[20]  Wen Gao,et al.  Interactive Web Video Advertising with Context Analysis and Search , 2010, 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[21]  Berthier A. Ribeiro-Neto,et al.  Impedance coupling in content-targeted advertising , 2005, SIGIR '05.