Evaluation of Cost-Conscious Course-Embedded Research Projects in a Freshman Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Course

Abstract Students who experience research as undergraduates tend to remain in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields. Since course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) are often expensive to implement, we developed a relatively inexpensive first-semester research course for majors entitled “Freshman Research in Biochemistry,” in which approximately 100 students participated in an ongoing research project each year. During this course, students conducted laboratory work related to multiple research veins, and graduate teaching assistants (TAs) and the instructor ensured that sufficient data from the laboratory were made available to the students to analyze. During three unique course iterations, students worked on faculty research projects that included connecting contigs of the draft genome of a native Oklahoma bacterial Arhodomonas isolate capable of degrading petroleum hydrocarbons, cloning antibiotic resistance genes from the genus Elizabethkingia, and analyzing RNAseq data from Elizabethkingia anopheles challenged with cell wall-active antibiotics to determine gene function, gene differential expression, and relative gene genome location. During the course, students scored results, analyzed data, maintained laboratory notebooks, and presented posters in a symposium to faculty and graduate TAs. To determine positive impacts of the course on students, they completed the Laboratory Course Assessment Survey in two course sections. Survey data indicated/students agreed that the course included elements of Iteration, Collaboration, and Discovery and Relevance. Students also reported that they gained scientific skills but were ambivalent about whether instructor feedback was harsh. Examination of Student Survey of Instruction responses showed students thought positively about the course, but some considered it too difficult. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Biochemistry major cohort tracking revealed no effect of Freshman Research in Biochemistry on student persistence in the major or institution. Nonetheless, we consider the course a cost-conscious model for biochemistry and molecular biology departments for introducing research to first-year students.

[1]  R. Tinghitella,et al.  Using Inter-Institutional Collaboration to Generate Publishable Findings through Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences , 2021, The American Biology Teacher.

[2]  J. P. Davis,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics and genomic features of the Elizabethkingia anophelis 2015 to 2016 Wisconsin outbreak strain , 2017, Nature Communications.

[3]  Jeffrey T. Olimpo,et al.  Development and Evaluation of the Tigriopus Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience: Impacts on Students’ Content Knowledge, Attitudes, and Motivation in a Majors Introductory Biology Course , 2016, CBE life sciences education.

[4]  Patrick J. Killion,et al.  CUREs in biochemistry—where we are and where we should go , 2016, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[5]  Erin L. Dolan,et al.  Early Engagement in Course-Based Research Increases Graduation Rates and Completion of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Degrees , 2016, CBE life sciences education.

[6]  Erin L. Dolan,et al.  The Laboratory Course Assessment Survey: A Tool to Measure Three Dimensions of Research-Course Design , 2015, CBE life sciences education.

[7]  Josh T. Beckham,et al.  The Freshman Research Initiative as a Model for Addressing Shortages and Disparities in STEM Engagement , 2015 .

[8]  Sara E. Brownell,et al.  Toward a conceptual framework for measuring the effectiveness of course-based undergraduate research experiences in undergraduate biology , 2015 .

[9]  B. Roe,et al.  Arhodomonas sp. Strain Seminole and Its Genetic Potential To Degrade Aromatic Compounds under High-Salinity Conditions , 2014, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[10]  Kristen R. Miller,et al.  Redefining Authentic Research Experiences in Introductory Biology Laboratories and Barriers to Their Implementation , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[11]  Pratibha Varma-Nelson,et al.  Assessment of Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences: A Meeting Report , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[12]  R. Serpe,et al.  STEM enrichment programs and graduate school matriculation: the role of science identity salience , 2013, Social psychology of education : an international journal.

[13]  Jo Handelsman,et al.  Increasing Persistence of College Students in STEM , 2013, Science.

[14]  M. J. Chang,et al.  Making a Difference in Science Education , 2013, American educational research journal.

[15]  A. Hosoyama,et al.  Draft Genome Sequences of Elizabethkingia meningoseptica , 2013, Genome Announcements.

[16]  Paul R. Hernandez,et al.  Sustaining Optimal Motivation: A Longitudinal Analysis of Interventions to Broaden Participation of Underrepresented Students in STEM. , 2013, Journal of educational psychology.

[17]  G. Weaver,et al.  Participants' reflections two and three years after an introductory chemistry course-embedded research experience , 2013 .

[18]  Mary Lee S. Ledbetter,et al.  Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action Presentation to Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience, July 2011 , 2012, Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience.

[19]  David Lopatto,et al.  Classroom-Based Science Research at the Introductory Level: Changes in Career Choices and Attitude , 2011, CBE life sciences education.

[20]  Barbara K. Goza,et al.  The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students , 2011 .

[21]  Paul R. Hernandez,et al.  Toward a Model of Social Influence that Explains Minority Student Integration into the Scientific Community. , 2011, Journal of educational psychology.

[22]  Sandra L. Laursen,et al.  Undergraduate research in the sciences : engaging students in real science , 2010 .

[23]  E. Seymour,et al.  Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three‐year study , 2004 .

[24]  N. Al-Thani,et al.  Undergraduate Research Experience Models: A systematic review of the literature from 2011 to 2021 , 2022, International Journal of Educational Research.

[25]  K. Bush,et al.  The ABCD’s of β-lactamase nomenclature , 2013, Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy.