Are there limits to binaural additivity of loudness?

In recent years there has been notable interest in additive models of sensory integration. Binaural additivity has emerged as a main hypothesis in the loudness-scaling literature and has recently been asserted by authors using an axiomatic approach to psychophysics. Restrictions of the range of stimuli used in the majority of former experiments, and inherent weaknesses of the axiomatic study by Levelt, Riemersma, and Bunt (1972) are discussed as providing reasons for the present investigation. A limited binaural additivity (LBA) model is proposed that assumes contralateral binaural inhibition for interaural intensity differences that exceed a critical level. Experimental data are reported for 12 subjects in a loudness-matching task designed to test the axioms of cancellation and of commutativity, both necessary to the existence of strict binaural additivity. In a 2 X 2 design, frequencies of 200 Hz and 2 kHz were used, and mean intensity levels were 20 dB apart. Additivity was found violated in 33 out of 48 possible tests. The LBA model is shown to predict the systematic nonadditivity in the loudness judgments and to conform to results from other studies.

[1]  Friedrich Wilkening,et al.  Combining of stimulus dimensions in children's and adults' judgments of area: An information integration analysis. , 1979 .

[2]  B. Scharf,et al.  Binaural summation of loudness: reconsidered. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  Irwin Rj,et al.  BINAURAL SUMMATION OF THERMAL NOISES OF EQUAL AND UNEQUAL POWER IN EACH EAR. , 1965 .

[4]  R J IRWIN.  BINAURAL SUMMATION OF THERMAL NOISES OF EQUAL AND UNEQUAL POWER IN EACH EAR. , 1965, The American journal of psychology.

[5]  R. J. Irwin,et al.  Auditory intensity discriminal scale I. Evidence derived from binaural intensity summation. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  G. Iverson,et al.  Binaural "loudness" summation: probabilistic theory and data. , 1979, Psychological review.

[7]  K. Keen.  Preservation of constant loudness with interaural amplitude asymmetry. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  J. Larimer,et al.  The number of two-way tables satisfying certain additivity axioms , 1976 .

[9]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and Refutations , 1963 .

[10]  N. Anderson.  Foundations of information integration theory , 1981 .

[11]  J. Falmagne.  Random Conjoint Measurement and Loudness Summation. , 1976 .

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Similarity of rectangles: An analysis of subjective dimensions , 1975 .

[13]  G. McClelland.  A note on Arbuckle and Larimer, “the number of two-way tables satisfying certain additivity axioms” , 1977 .

[14]  L E Marks,et al.  Binaural summation of the loudness of pure tones. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  G. Strube.  Binaural processing of temporal and intensity cues: Suggestions for a one-system model , 1982, Psychological research.

[16]  Jaap Van Brakel,et al.  Foundations of measurement , 1983 .

[17]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Messung und Modellbildung in der Psychologie , 1981 .

[18]  Peter H. Schönemann,et al.  A note on additive functional measurement. , 1973 .

[19]  J. Falmagne.  On a class of probabilistic conjoint measurement models: Some diagnostic properties☆ , 1979 .

[20]  Jozef J. Zwislocki,et al.  Monaural Loudness Function at 1000 cps and Interaural Summation , 1963 .

[21]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Binaural Summation of Loudness , 1960 .

[22]  W. Levelt,et al.  Binaural additivity of loudness. , 1972, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[23]  B. Scharf,et al.  Dichotic summation of loudness. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.