The Confine-and-Release Method: Obtaining Correct Binding Free Energies in the Presence of Protein Conformational Change.

Free energy calculations are increasingly being used to estimate absolute and relative binding free energies of ligands to proteins. However, computed free energies often appear to depend on the initial protein conformation, indicating incomplete sampling. This is especially true when proteins can change conformation on ligand binding, as free energies associated with these conformational changes are either ignored or assumed to be included by virtue of the sampling performed in the calculation. Here, we show that, in a model protein system (a designed binding site in T4 Lysozyme), conformational changes can make a difference of several kcal/mol in computed binding free energies, and that they are neglected in computed binding free energies if the system remains kinetically trapped in a particular metastable state on simulation timescales. We introduce a general "confine-and-release" framework for free energy calculations that accounts for these free energies of conformational change. We illustrate its use in this model system by demonstrating that an umbrella sampling protocol can obtain converged binding free energies that are independent of the starting protein structure and include these conformational change free energies.

[1]  B. Matthews,et al.  Specificity of ligand binding in a buried nonpolar cavity of T4 lysozyme: linkage of dynamics and structural plasticity. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[2]  B. Roux,et al.  Absolute binding free energy calculations using molecular dynamics simulations with restraining potentials. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[3]  T. P. Straatsma,et al.  Treatment of rotational isomers in free energy evaluations. Analysis of the evaluation of free energy differences by molecular dynamics simulations of systems with rotational isomeric states , 1989 .

[4]  Benoît Roux,et al.  Calculation of Standard Binding Free Energies:  Aromatic Molecules in the T4 Lysozyme L99A Mutant. , 2006, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[5]  B. Shoichet,et al.  Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[6]  Jens Meiler,et al.  ROSETTALIGAND: Protein–small molecule docking with full side‐chain flexibility , 2006, Proteins.

[7]  Stefan Boresch,et al.  Alchemical free energy calculations and multiple conformational substates. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[8]  M. Jacobson,et al.  Molecular mechanics methods for predicting protein-ligand binding. , 2006, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[9]  M. Gilson,et al.  The statistical-thermodynamic basis for computation of binding affinities: a critical review. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[10]  Viktor Hornak,et al.  HIV-1 protease flaps spontaneously open and reclose in molecular dynamics simulations. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Chris Oostenbrink,et al.  Computational study of ground‐state chiral induction in small peptides: Comparison of the relative stability of selected amino acid dimers and oligomers in homochiral and heterochiral combinations , 2006, J. Comput. Chem..

[12]  Michael R. Shirts,et al.  Direct calculation of the binding free energies of FKBP ligands. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[13]  R. Swendsen,et al.  THE weighted histogram analysis method for free‐energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method , 1992 .

[14]  T. Darden,et al.  A smooth particle mesh Ewald method , 1995 .

[15]  Wilfred F van Gunsteren,et al.  Calculation of the Redox Potential of the Protein Azurin and Some Mutants , 2005, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[16]  W. L. Jorgensen The Many Roles of Computation in Drug Discovery , 2004, Science.

[17]  Stefan Boresch,et al.  Absolute Binding Free Energies: A Quantitative Approach for Their Calculation , 2003 .