Examining commute routes: applications of GIS and GPS technology

ObjectiveThe application of geographic information systems (GIS) to describe commute route elements is commonplace, yet the accuracy of GIS-estimated commute routes is not clear. This study compared GIS-estimated commute routes against actual routes traveled as measured using global positioning systems (GPS) to examine differences in urban form surrounding travel routes across different buffer sizes and travel modes.MethodsThirty-seven adults from Auckland, New Zealand participated in the study between January and March 2008. Participants wore GPS units and completed a travel log for 7 days. GPS data were integrated into a GIS database to ascertain commute routes.ResultsOverall, 29 commute journeys were appropriately captured by GPS. Levels of agreement between actual and shortest commute routes were dependent on the buffer size selected, built environment variable examined, and travel mode.ConclusionsDespite technical difficulties, GPS assessment of routes traveled is recommended to provide an accurate assessment of commute journey urban form elements.

[1]  Philip J Schluter,et al.  Objectively measured commute distance: associations with actual travel modes and perceptions to place of work or study in Auckland, New Zealand. , 2007, Journal of physical activity & health.

[2]  G. Schofield,et al.  Understanding the Relationship between Activity and Neighbourhoods (URBAN) Study: research design and methodology , 2009, BMC public health.

[3]  B. Saelens,et al.  Built environment correlates of walking: a review. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[4]  M. Duncan,et al.  GIS or GPS? A comparison of two methods for assessing route taken during active transport. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[5]  B. Giles-Corti,et al.  Personal, family, social, and environmental correlates of active commuting to school. , 2006, American journal of preventive medicine.

[6]  Daniel A. Rodriguez,et al.  The relationship between non-motorized mode choice and the local physical environment , 2004 .

[7]  Scott Duncan,et al.  Combining GPS, GIS, and accelerometry: methodological issues in the assessment of location and intensity of travel behaviors. , 2010, Journal of physical activity & health.

[8]  Anne Vernez Moudon,et al.  The 3Ds + R: Quantifying Land Use and Urban Form Correlates of Walking , 2006 .

[9]  J. Sallis.  Measuring physical activity environments: a brief history. , 2009, American journal of preventive medicine.

[10]  Anne Ellaway,et al.  Lack of agreement between measured and self-reported distance from public green parks in Glasgow, Scotland , 2008, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[11]  Shauna L. Hallmark,et al.  Accuracy Issues with Route Choice Data Collection by Using Global Positioning System , 1999 .

[12]  G. Schofield,et al.  Travel behavior and objectively measured urban design variables: associations for adults traveling to work. , 2008, Health & place.