An SMLD Joint PDF Model for Turbulent Non-Premixed Combustion Using the Flamelet Progress-Variable Approach

This paper provides an improved flamelet/progress variable (FPV) model for the simulation of turbulent combustion, employing the statistically most likely distribution (SMLD) approach for the joint probability density function (PDF) of the mixture fraction, Z, and of the progress parameter, Λ. Steady-state FPV models are built presuming the functional shape of the joint PDF of Z and Λ in order to evaluate Favre-averages of thermodynamic quantities. The mixture fraction is widely assumed to behave as a passive scalar with a mono-modal behaviour modelled by a β-distribution. Moreover, under the hypothesis that Z and Λ are statistically independent, the joint PDF coincides with the product of the two marginal PDFs. In this work we discuss these two constitutive hypotheses. The proposed model evaluates the most probable joint distribution of Z and Λ, relaxing some crucial assumption on their statistical behaviour. This provides a more general model in the context of FPV approach and an effective tool to verify the adequateness of widely used hypotheses. The model is validated versus experimental data of well-known test cases, namely, the Sandia flames. The results are also compared with those obtained by the standard FPV approach, analysing the role of the PDF functional form on turbulent combustion simulations.

[1]  J. Riley,et al.  A subgrid model for equilibrium chemistry in turbulent flows , 1994 .

[2]  Stephen B. Pope,et al.  Molecular diffusion effects in LES of a piloted methane–air flame , 2011 .

[3]  J. S. Kim,et al.  Structures of Flow and Mixture-Fraction Fields for Counterflow Diffusion Flames with Small Stoichiometric Mixture Fractions , 1993, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[4]  W. Verkley The statistical mechanics of turbulent flows , 2010 .

[5]  Christopher L. Rumsey,et al.  Assessment of two-equation turbulence models for transonic flows , 1994 .

[6]  N. Peters,et al.  A Consistent Flamelet Formulation for Non-Premixed Combustion Considering Differential Diffusion Effects , 1998 .

[7]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  Prediction of extinction and reignition in nonpremixed turbulent flames using a flamelet/progress variable model: 1. A priori study and presumed PDF closure , 2008 .

[8]  P. Jenny,et al.  PDF model for NO calculations with radiation and consistent NO–NO2 chemistry in non-premixed turbulent flames , 2011 .

[9]  Van Oijen,et al.  Modelling of Premixed Laminar Flames using Flamelet-Generated Manifolds , 2000 .

[10]  Stephen B. Pope,et al.  A Rational Method of Determining Probability Distributions in Turbulent Reacting Flows , 1979 .

[11]  J. Abraham,et al.  Evaluation of an unsteady flamelet progress variable model for autoignition and flame development in compositionally stratified mixtures , 2012 .

[12]  C. Merkle,et al.  A Preconditioned Dual-Time, Diagonalized ADI Scheme for Unsteady Computations , 1997 .

[13]  M. Rogers,et al.  A priori testing of subgrid models for chemically reacting non-premixed turbulent shear flows , 1997, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  A. Masri,et al.  Turbulent piloted partially-premixed flames with varying levels of O2/N2: stability limits and PDF calculations , 2011 .

[15]  B. Merci,et al.  A priori investigation of PDF-modeling assumptions for a turbulent swirling bluff body flame ('SM1') , 2012 .

[16]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[17]  R. Barlow,et al.  Effects of turbulence on species mass fractions in methane/air jet flames , 1998 .

[18]  Parviz Moin,et al.  An evaluation of the assumed beta probability density function subgrid-scale model for large eddy simulation of nonpremixed, turbulent combustion with heat release , 2000 .

[19]  Nasser Darabiha,et al.  Liminar premixed hydrogen/air counterflow flame simulations using flame prolongation of ILDM with differential diffusion , 2000 .

[20]  N. Peters Laminar diffusion flamelet models in non-premixed turbulent combustion , 1984 .

[21]  Michele Napolitano,et al.  A RANS flamelet–progress-variable method for computing reacting flows of real-gas mixtures , 2010 .

[22]  H. Pitsch,et al.  Higher-order conditional moment closure modelling of local extinction and reignition in turbulent combustion , 2002 .

[23]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  Prediction of local extinction and re-ignition effects in non-premixed turbulent combustion using a flamelet/progress variable approach , 2005 .

[24]  C. Pierce,et al.  Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of turbulent combustion , 2001 .

[25]  Jan Baeyens,et al.  Progress in Energy and Combustion Science , 2015 .

[26]  P. Moin,et al.  Progress-variable approach for large-eddy simulation of non-premixed turbulent combustion , 2004, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[27]  N. Fueyo,et al.  Subgrid Linear Eddy Mixing and Combustion Modelling of a Turbulent Nonpremixed Piloted Jet Flame , 2012 .

[28]  Douglas Alan Schwer Numerical study of unsteadiness in non-reacting and reacting mixing layers , 1999 .

[29]  N. Peters,et al.  Unsteady flamelet modeling of turbulent hydrogen-air diffusion flames , 1998 .

[30]  Pham Dinh Tao,et al.  An optimization-based approach to detailed chemistry tabulation: Automated progress variable definition , 2013 .

[31]  S. Pope PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows , 1985 .

[32]  L. Mongeau,et al.  Systematic definition of progress variables and Intrinsically Low-Dimensional, Flamelet Generated Manifolds for chemistry tabulation , 2012 .

[33]  J. Wen,et al.  LES of the Sandia Flame D Using Laminar Flamelet Decomposition for Conditional Source-Term Estimation , 2008 .

[34]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  Prediction of extinction and reignition in nonpremixed turbulent flames using a flamelet/progress variable model. 2. Application in LES of Sandia flames D and E , 2008 .

[35]  J. Steger,et al.  Flux vector splitting of the inviscid gasdynamic equations with application to finite-difference methods , 1981 .

[36]  A. Klimenko,et al.  Conditional moment closure for turbulent combustion , 1999 .

[37]  Ulrich Maas,et al.  Simplifying chemical kinetics: Intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds in composition space , 1992 .

[38]  T. Pulliam,et al.  A diagonal form of an implicit approximate-factorization algorithm , 1981 .

[39]  Jian Zhang,et al.  Regularization of reaction progress variable for application to flamelet-based combustion models , 2012, J. Comput. Phys..