Predicting and mapping of soil particle‐size fractions with adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference and ant colony optimization in central Iran

In arid regions, knowledge of the variation in soil texture is crucial for land management because it affects soil physical, chemical, biological and most importantly hydrological properties. The availability of information on soil texture is scarce even though it is required to support land-use management and sustainable development. Because it is costly to obtain information about the individual particle-size fractions (PSFs), we used digital soil mapping methods (DSM) with environmental covariates that are less costly to obtain. Specifically, we explored the use of a digital elevation model and remote sensing data as environmental covariates to predict the vertical (i.e. 0–0.15, 0.15–0.3, 0.3–0.6 and 0.6–1 m) and lateral variation in PSFs over a 150-km2 area in central Iran. We used a combination of equal-area spline depth functions and three data-mining techniques: multiple linear regression (MLR), artificial neural networks (ANN) and the neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). In addition, we explored the effect of the reduction in dimension of feature space with ant colony optimization (ACO) and correlation-based feature selection (CFS) on the accuracy of prediction of spatial models for each PSF. The results showed that the prediction of clay at 0–0.15-m depth with ACO indicated the importance of including Landsat ETM+, the digital numbers of band 7 of Landsat images (B7) and clay index, whereas at 0.60–1-m depth the wetness index and multi-resolution valley bottom flatness index (MRVBF) were important. Model evaluation by leave-one-out cross-validation with 191 soil observations indicated that the predictions by the ACO-based ANFIS model (RMSE = 4.51% and R2 = 0.74 for clay at 0–0.15-m) were more accurate than those by MLR and ANN. Spatial prediction was also better for the topsoil (0–0.15-m) than at depth (RMSE = 7.1% for clay at 0.6–1 m); therefore, we conclude that the environmental covariates tested cannot resolve subsurface variation as accurately. Nevertheless, we recommend prediction by the ACO-based ANFIS model and splines of lateral and vertical distribution of PSFs in other arid regions of Iran with the same agro-ecological conditions. Highlights Digital soil mapping of particle size-fractions (PSF) by adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference and ant colony optimization. Use of ant colony optimization (ACO) to assist in feature selection of environmental covariates. Neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) superior to multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural networks (ANN). PSF prediction by ACO-based ANFIS model and splines is optimal.

[1]  Jongsung Kim,et al.  Holistic environmental soil-landscape modeling of soil organic carbon , 2014, Environ. Model. Softw..

[2]  Wei Li,et al.  Modeling soil water content in extreme arid area using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system , 2015 .

[3]  R. Kerry,et al.  Digital mapping of soil organic carbon at multiple depths using different data mining techniques in Baneh region, Iran , 2016 .

[4]  A. Besalatpour,et al.  Estimating wet soil aggregate stability from easily available properties in a highly mountainous watershed , 2013 .

[5]  I. Odeh,et al.  SPATIAL PREDICTION OF SOIL PARTICLE-SIZE FRACTIONS AS COMPOSITIONAL DATA , 2003 .

[6]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  Mapping continuous depth functions of soil carbon storage and available water capacity , 2009 .

[7]  Ahmad Jalalian,et al.  Pedodiversity and pedogenesis in Zayandeh-rud Valley, Central Iran , 2006 .

[8]  J. Triantafilis,et al.  Mapping clay content variation using electromagnetic induction techniques , 2005 .

[9]  Philippe Lagacherie,et al.  Evaluating Digital Soil Mapping approaches for mapping GlobalSoilMap soil properties from legacy data in Languedoc-Roussillon (France) , 2015 .

[10]  B. Stenberg,et al.  Near‐infrared spectroscopy for within‐field soil characterization: small local calibrations compared with national libraries spiked with local samples , 2010 .

[11]  Rudi Goossens,et al.  The Efficiency of Landsat TM and ETM+ Thermal Data for Extracting Soil Information in Arid Regions , 2008 .

[12]  Gerard B. M. Heuvelink,et al.  Sampling for validation of digital soil maps , 2011 .

[13]  Tomislav Hengl,et al.  Methods to interpolate soil categorical variables from profile observations: Lessons from Iran , 2007 .

[14]  Mohammad Teshnehlab,et al.  Using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for hydrological time series prediction , 2008, Appl. Soft Comput..

[15]  Qing Zhu,et al.  Spatial estimation of surface soil texture using remote sensing data , 2013 .

[16]  Jyh-Shing Roger Jang,et al.  ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[17]  J. Iqbal,et al.  Evaluation of Landsat TM5 Multispectral Data for Automated Mapping of Surface Soil Texture and Organic Matter in GIS , 2014 .

[18]  A-Xing Zhu,et al.  Multi-scale digital terrain analysis and feature selection for digital soil mapping , 2010 .

[19]  Hamed Kashi,et al.  Estimation of Soil Infiltration and Cation Exchange Capacity Based on Multiple Regression, ANN (RBF, MLP), and ANFIS Models , 2014 .

[20]  B. Huwe,et al.  Uncertainty in the spatial prediction of soil texture: Comparison of regression tree and Random Forest models , 2012 .

[21]  M. Sugeno,et al.  Multi-dimensional fuzzy reasoning , 1983 .

[22]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[23]  Hossein Nezamabadi-pour,et al.  An advanced ACO algorithm for feature subset selection , 2015, Neurocomputing.

[24]  Cristiano Ballabio,et al.  Spatial prediction of soil properties in temperate mountain regions using support vector regression , 2009 .

[25]  Dominique Arrouays,et al.  Prediction of soil texture using descriptive statistics and area-to-point kriging in Region Centre (France) , 2016 .

[26]  N. McKenzie,et al.  Spatial prediction of soil properties using environmental correlation , 1999 .

[27]  Parham Moradi,et al.  Relevance-redundancy feature selection based on ant colony optimization , 2015, Pattern Recognit..

[28]  S. Lamsal,et al.  Mapping soil textural fractions across a large watershed in north-east Florida. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[29]  Nadia Abd-Alsabour,et al.  Investigating the effect of fixing the subset length on the performance of ant colony optimization for feature selection for supervised learning , 2015, Comput. Electr. Eng..

[30]  John Triantafilis,et al.  COMPARISON OF STATISTICAL PREDICTION METHODS FOR ESTIMATING FIELD-SCALE CLAY CONTENT USING DIFFERENT COMBINATIONS OF ANCILLARY VARIABLES , 2001 .

[31]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  High‐Resolution 3‐D Mapping of Soil Texture in Denmark , 2013 .

[32]  Murray Woods,et al.  GIS-fuzzy logic based approach in modeling soil texture: Using parts of the Clay Belt and Hornepayne region in Ontario Canada as a case study , 2015 .

[33]  D. Bui,et al.  A comparative assessment of support vector regression, artificial neural networks, and random forests for predicting and mapping soil organic carbon stocks across an Afromontane landscape. , 2015 .

[34]  John Triantafilis,et al.  Digital soil mapping of compositional particle-size fractions using proximal and remotely sensed ancillary data , 2012 .

[35]  F. H. C. Marriott,et al.  An improved method for reconstructing a soil profile from analyses of a small number of samples , 1986 .

[36]  Budiman Minasny,et al.  On digital soil mapping , 2003 .

[37]  Hui Liu,et al.  Comparison of new hybrid FEEMD-MLP, FEEMD-ANFIS, Wavelet Packet-MLP and Wavelet Packet-ANFIS for wind speed predictions , 2015 .