A Sprayable Hydrogel Adhesion Barrier Facilitates Closure of Defunctioning Loop Ileostomy: A Randomized Trial

PurposeClosure of defunctioning loop ileostomy often is associated with division of complex peristomal adhesions through a parastomal incision with limited exposure. The goal was to determine whether sprayable hydrogel adhesion barrier (SprayGel™) will reduce peristomal adhesions and facilitate closure of ileostomy.MethodsPatients undergoing closure of loop ileostomy were randomized to have hydrogel adhesion barrier sprayed around both limbs of ileostomy for 20 cm (SprayGel™ group, n = 19), or to control without adhesion barrier (control group, n = 21). Ileostomy was reversed at ten weeks after construction. Extent of peristomal adhesions was scored in blinded manner (each quadrant, range, 1–3: 3 = most severe; total, range, 4–12: 12 = most severe).ResultsUse of adhesion barrier was associated with significant reduction in overall adhesion scores (mean, 6.11 vs. 9.67; P < 0.0005), four-quadrant adhesion scores (Quadrant A: 1.68 vs. 2.52, P = 0.002; Quadrant B: 1.42 vs. 2.33, P < 0.0005; Quadrant C: 1.42 vs. 2.24, P < 0.0005; Quadrant D: 1.58 vs. 2.48, P = 0.002), and proportion of patients with dense (scores ≥ 8) adhesions (0.11 vs. 0.71; P < 0.0005). Time taken to mobilize (16.53 vs. 21.67 minutes; P = 0.008) and close ileostomy (35.37 vs. 41.90 minutes; P = 0.008) was significantly reduced. Postoperative complications were comparable.ConclusionsA sprayable hydrogel adhesion barrier placed around the limbs of a defunctioning loop ileostomy reduced peristomal adhesions and might facilitate closure of ileostomy.

[1]  Raftery At Regeneration of peritoneum: a fibrinolytic study. , 1979 .

[2]  A. Raftery Regeneration of peritoneum: a fibrinolytic study. , 1979, Journal of anatomy.

[3]  R. Beart,et al.  Small Intestinal Obstruction Complicating Ileal Pouch‐anal Anastomosis , 1989, Annals of surgery.

[4]  H. Ellis,et al.  Intestinal obstruction from adhesions--how big is the problem? , 1990, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[5]  D. Menzies,et al.  Postoperative adhesions: their treatment and relevance in clinical practice. , 1993, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[6]  V. Gomel,et al.  Pathophysiology of adhesion formation and strategies for prevention. , 1996, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[7]  S. Stryker,et al.  Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[8]  G. diZerega Use of adhesion prevention barriers in ovarian surgery, tubalplasty, ectopic pregnancy, endometriosis, adhesiolysis, and myomectomy. , 1996, Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology.

[9]  D. Beck The role of Seprafilm bioresorbable membrane in adhesion prevention. , 1997, The European journal of surgery. Supplement. : = Acta chirurgica. Supplement.

[10]  S. Perry,et al.  Abdominal adhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditures in the United States in 1994. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[11]  M. Parker,et al.  Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study , 1999, The Lancet.

[12]  J. Fleshman,et al.  Effect of previous surgery on abdominal opening time , 2000, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[13]  P. Campbell,et al.  Evaluation of a sprayable polyethylene glycol adhesion barrier in a porcine efficacy model. , 2001, Human reproduction.

[14]  P. Campbell,et al.  Evaluation of the SprayGel adhesion barrier in the rat cecum abrasion and rabbit uterine horn adhesion models. , 2001, Fertility and sterility.

[15]  Initial feasibility study of a sprayable hydrogel adhesion barrier system in patients undergoing laparoscopic ovarian surgery. , 2002, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[16]  L. Mettler,et al.  Pelvic Adhesions: Laparoscopic Approach , 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[17]  L. Mettler,et al.  Prospective clinical trial of SprayGel as a barrier to adhesion formation: an interim analysis. , 2003, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[18]  C. Tang,et al.  Bioresorbable Adhesion Barrier Facilitates Early Closure of the Defunctioning Ileostomy After Rectal Excision: A Prospective, Randomized Trial , 2003 .

[19]  M. Parker,et al.  Colorectal surgery: the risk and burden of adhesion‐related complications , 2004, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[20]  L. Mettler,et al.  A randomized, prospective, controlled, multicenter clinical trial of a sprayable, site-specific adhesion barrier system in patients undergoing myomectomy. , 2004, Fertility and sterility.

[21]  J. Abbott,et al.  SprayGel™ following surgery for Asherman's syndrome may improve pregnancy outcome , 2004, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[22]  R. Lilford,et al.  Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery. , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.