Energy consumption vs. users' perceptions: a quantitative study of energy and comfort in university campus

The relationship between users' perceptions of comfort and energy performance is an important integration of society with the environment which also have indirect implications to the economy. Achieving users' comfort in buildings involves the use of energy where multiple studies have associated energy use via heating and cooling as predictors of users' comfort. However, these studies have neglected the magnitude of energy needed to achieve comfort. Therefore, the current paper investigates the quantum of electricity used in a public university to achieve users' comfort. The investigation adopts the quantitative method of comparing electricity consumption and users' comfort via two different instruments namely; energy loggers and occupant survey. An energy logger was installed on three study buildings while an occupant survey was distributed to users of the same buildings. Benchmarking was used to compare energy indices of the study buildings. It was found that the study building with the highest energy index also scored the highest perception of comfort by the users. As thermal control for indoor comfort account for more than half of the total electricity consumption, the result suggested that electricity consumption predicts users' comfort positively.However, the ratio of energy consumed and comfort achieved is questionable. This study suggests that a substantial amount of electricity is needed to achieve a small measure of comfort. Additionally, the study also revealed that two of the study buildings performed poorly in terms of energy performance while one performed fairly well with the potential of becoming an energy-efficient building. By replicating the study to other buildings, the research can help identify energy-efficient potentials in buildings towards reducing the campus' energy consumption holistically.

[1]  David E. Gunderson,et al.  Understanding high performance buildings: The link between occupant knowledge of passive design systems, corresponding behaviors, occupant comfort and environmental satisfaction , 2015 .

[2]  Tuan Anh Nguyen,et al.  Energy intelligent buildings based on user activity: A survey , 2013 .

[3]  Chen Wang,et al.  Potentials For Sustainable Improvement In Building Energy Efficiency: Case Studies In Tropical Zone. , 2011 .

[4]  Azami Zaharim,et al.  Building energy index (BEI) in large scale hospital: case study of Malaysia , 2011 .

[5]  H. Wallbaum,et al.  Impact of sustainable office buildings on occupant's comfort and productivity , 2013 .

[6]  Umberto Berardi,et al.  Clarifying the new interpretations of the concept of sustainable building , 2013 .

[7]  Richard E. Zigenfus Element analysis of the green building process , 2008 .

[8]  S. Y. Sharifah Noor Nazim,et al.  Green potential rating tool: An assessment of green potential for conventional buildings , 2014 .

[9]  Zhonghua Gou,et al.  Are green buildings more satisfactory and comfortable , 2013 .

[10]  Duncan David Nulty,et al.  The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? , 2008 .

[11]  Hasim Altan,et al.  Energy Performance Analysis of University Buildings: Case Studies atSheffield University, UK , 2014 .

[12]  Denise A. Guerin,et al.  Indoor Environmental Quality of Classrooms and Student Outcomes: A Path Analysis Approach , 2014 .

[13]  Mary C. Hill,et al.  The Impact of Physical Classroom Environment on Student Satisfaction and Student Evaluation of Teaching in the University Environment , 2010 .

[14]  A. Bowling Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality. , 2005, Journal of public health.

[15]  Ali F. Alajmi Energy audit of an educational building in a hot summer climate , 2012 .

[16]  George Baird,et al.  Designers’ intentions versus users’ perceptions: a comparison of two refurbished office buildings , 2012 .

[17]  Burcin Becerik-Gerber,et al.  A study on student perceptions of higher education classrooms: Impact of classroom attributes on student satisfaction and performance , 2013 .

[18]  Athanasios Tzempelikos,et al.  Daylighting and energy analysis of private offices with automated interior roller shades , 2012 .

[19]  S. Y. Sharifah Noor Nazim,et al.  Conventional buildings versus green buildings: Perception of building occupants , 2014 .

[20]  Yehuda Baruch,et al.  Response Rate in Academic Studies — A Comparative Analysis , 1999 .

[21]  L. T. Wong,et al.  Student learning performance and indoor environmental quality (IEQ) in air-conditioned university teaching rooms , 2012 .

[22]  Liu Yang,et al.  Thermal comfort and building energy consumption implications - A review , 2014 .

[23]  George Baird,et al.  Users' perceptions of sustainable buildings – Key findings of recent studies , 2015 .