Clinical efficacy of bone cement injectable pedicle screw system combined with intervertebral fusion in treatment of lumbar spondylolysis and osteoporosis

Objective  To observe the therapeutic effect of bone cement injectable pedicle screw system combined with intervertebral fusion for lumbar spondylolysis and osteoporosis. Methods  The clinical data were analyzed retrospectively of 21 patients with lumbar spondylolysis and osteoporosis who received treatment of bone cement injectable pedicle screw system and intervertebral fusion from Aug. 2013 to Nov. 2015. The 21 patients (9 males and 12 females) aged from 60 to 80 years (mean 64 years old); 6 of them presented degenerative spondylolysis, 15 with isthmic spondylolisthesis; 2 cases had I degree slippage, 13 had Ⅱdegree slippage, 6 had Ⅲdegree slippage, and all the cases were unisegmental slippage including 9 cases in L4 and 12 cases in L5. Bone mineral density of lumbar vertebrae (L2-L5) was measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and T values conforming to the diagnostic criteria of osteoporosis were less than or equal to -2.5; All patients were operated with whole lamina resection for decompression, bone cement injectable pedicle screws system implantation, propped open reduction and fixation intervertebral fusion. The clinical outcomes were determined by the radiographic evaluation including intervertebral height, height of intervertebral foramen, slip distance, slip rate and slip angle, and Oswestry disability index (ODI) on preoperative, 3 months after operation and the end of the time, and the interbody fusion were followed up. Results  Cerebrospinal fluid leakage of incision was observed in two cases after operation, compression and dressing to incision, Trendelenburg position, dehydration and other treatments were taken, and the stitches of incisions were taken out on schedule. Slips in the 21 patients were reset to different extent, and lumbar physiological curvatures were recovered. The intervertebral height and height of intervertebral foramen were obviously higher 3 months after operation than that before operation (P 0.05). Based on the ODI score, the excellent/fine rate was 90.6% and 92.5% for 3 months after operation and the last follow-up, respectively. During the period of following up, no loss of the correction degrees, no loosening of the screws, and 19 cases were noted bony fusion with the fusion success rate of 90.5%. Conclusion  The treatment effect of bone cement injectable pedicle screw system and intervertebral fusion for lumbar spondylolysis and osteoporosis is satisfied. DOI: 10.11855/j.issn.0577-7402.2016.10.12

[1]  Ming,et al.  Comparison of interfaces of different pedicle screws with micro-CT technique in lumbar vertebrae with osteoporosis of sheep , 2015 .

[2]  Yang Libi Selection of the screw fixation path in atlas via pedicle of vertebral arch , 2014 .

[3]  H. Wilke,et al.  Grading of degenerative disk disease and functional impairment: imaging versus patho-anatomical findings , 2008, European Spine Journal.

[4]  Haruo Misawa,et al.  Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of an Improved Novel Pedicle Screw With Sheath and Bone Cement , 2007, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[5]  J. Tan,et al.  Cement Augmentation of Vertebral Screws Enhances the Interface Strength Between Interbody Device and Vertebral Body , 2007, Spine.

[6]  K. Okuyama,et al.  PLIF With a Titanium Cage and Excised Facet Joint Bone for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis—In Augmentation With a Pedicle Screw , 2007, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[7]  Wu Zixiang Histological analysis of pin-bone interface of expansive pedicle screw in osteoporotic sheep , 2007 .

[8]  A. Miyauchi,et al.  Surgical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  Cathy Lee,et al.  Nonunion of the spine: a review. , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[10]  W. Walsh,et al.  Hydroxyapatite Composite Resin Cement Augmentation of Pedicle Screw Fixation , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  B. Sandén,et al.  Hydroxyapatite coating improves fixation of pedicle screws. A clinical study. , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[12]  Chang-Hoon Jeon,et al.  Effect of Endplate Conditions and Bone Mineral Density on the Compressive Strength of the Graft–Endplate Interface in Anterior Cervical Spine Fusion , 2001, Spine.

[13]  赵卫东,et al.  Augmentation of pedicle screw fixation with polymethylmethacrylate in the osteoporotic spine:an in vitro biomechanical study , 2001 .

[14]  O Johnell,et al.  Risk of hip fracture according to the World Health Organization criteria for osteopenia and osteoporosis. , 2000, Bone.

[15]  D. Heinemann Osteoporosis. An overview of the National Osteoporosis Foundation clinical practice guide. , 2000, Geriatrics.

[16]  S. Yerby,et al.  Revision of Failed Pedicle Screws Using Hydroxyapatite Cement: A Biomechanical Analysis , 1998, Spine.

[17]  D. Moore,et al.  Restoration of Pedicle Screw Fixation With an in Situ Setting Calcium Phosphate Cement , 1997, Spine.

[18]  V. Mathews,et al.  Lumbar spondylolysis: reactive marrow changes seen in adjacent pedicles on MR images. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  K Okuyama,et al.  Stability of transpedicle screwing for the osteoporotic spine. An in vitro study of the mechanical stability. , 1993, Spine.

[20]  W. Taillard [Spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents]. , 1954, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.