The effects of policy incentives in the adoption of willow short rotation coppice for bioenergy in Sweden

The effect of policy incentives in the development of short rotation willow plantations for bioenergy is studied by using an aggregate adoption model based on sigmoidal curves for the Swedish municipalities. A total of 56 municipalities were studied, with 891 farmers that planted willow during the period 1986-1996. The model included variables related to the subsidies applied, the taxation on fossil fuels, the development of the wood-fuel consumption by the district heating systems, and the geographical and socio-economic characteristics of the municipality. Results of the simulations using the model show an increment of almost 70% of farmers planting willow during the period studied when the subsidy and tax incentives and the increments of the wood-fuel capacity by the district heating system took place. This study gives tools for future policy implementations in order to achieve the goals of the energy strategies.

[1]  Debra Joyce Rubas,et al.  Technology adoption: who is likely to adopt and how does the timing affect the benefits? , 2004 .

[2]  Richard Sikkema,et al.  ESTABLISHMENT NEEDS FOR SHORT ROTATION FORESTRY IN THE EU TO MEET THE GOALS OF THE COMMISSION'S WHITE PAPER ON RENEWABLE ENERGY (NOVEMBER 1997) , 1998 .

[3]  Nils-Erik Nordh,et al.  Long term changes in stand structure and biomass production in short rotation willow coppice , 2005 .

[4]  J. G. Isebrands,et al.  Development of short-rotation willow coppice systems for environmental purposes in Sweden. , 2005 .

[5]  Z. Griliches.  HYBRID CORN: AN EXPLORATION IN THE ECONOMIC OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE , 1957 .

[6]  Anders Roos,et al.  Market development problems for sustainable bio-energy systems in Sweden. (The BIOMARK project) , 2004 .

[7]  Anders Roos,et al.  Retreat from Salix - Swedish experience with energy crops in the 1990s , 2006 .

[8]  Jerome K. Vanclay,et al.  Modelling Forest Growth and Yield: Applications to Mixed Tropical Forests , 1994 .

[9]  A. Roos,et al.  Farm-related Factors Influencing the Adoption of Short-rotation Willow Coppice Production Among Swedish Farmers , 2000 .

[10]  Göran Berndes,et al.  Bioenergy expansion in the EU: Cost-effective climate change mitigation, employment creation and reduced dependency on imported fuels , 2007 .

[11]  Lars J Nilsson,et al.  Bioenergy policy and market development in Finland and Sweden , 2004 .

[12]  P. Svenningsson,et al.  The use of biomass for energy in Sweden - Critical factors and lessons learned , 2002 .

[13]  D. Bates,et al.  Model Building for Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models , 2007 .

[14]  David J. Pannell,et al.  The economics of risk, uncertainty and learning in the adoption of new agricultural technologies: where are we on the learning curve? , 2003 .

[15]  Anders Roos,et al.  Willow growers in Sweden , 2000 .

[16]  Lars J Nilsson,et al.  Assessment of the potential biomass supply in Europe using a resource-focused approach , 2004 .

[17]  David J. Pannell,et al.  A conceptual framework of adoption of an agricultural innovation , 1999 .