Abstract In Brazil the widespread use of electrical showerheads for providing hot water for domestic consumption contributes to a load curve that peaks in the early evening, imposing a considerable burden to generation, transmission, and distribution utilities. On average, over 73% of Brazilian households use these 3–8 kW electrical resistance showerheads. In some of the more temperate climate regions in the south of the country, where most of the Brazilian population is concentrated, electrical showers are present in over 90% of residential buildings. For the residential consumer, while these high-power heating devices are the least-cost investment alternative, they lead to high running energy costs. Furthermore, due to their very low load factor (typically below 2%), each of these high-power showerheads results in considerably low return on the high investment costs in terms of infrastructure for the electricity sector. Particularly in low-income dwellings, electrical showerheads represent by far the highest electrical loads, resulting in a considerable component in the monthly energy bill. On the other hand, Brazil is one of the sunniest countries in the world, and solar water heating technologies have demonstrated large financial benefits and short payback times. Due to their comparatively higher initial investment costs, however, domestic solar water heaters are used mostly in higher income residences. In this work we present the potential of a low-cost version of the typical domestic solar water heating system for low-income dwellings, where the electrical resistance, which is normally installed inside the hot water tank, is replaced by a variable power electrical showerhead. This design avoids the use of electrical power as auxiliary heating for the whole of the boiler volume, since only the water which passes through the showerhead might be heated by the electrical resistance. This system configuration is a commercially available low-cost solar water heater option. A case-study is presented for a statistically representative group of low-income dwellings with solar water heating systems in Florianopolis – Brazil. Our results show that the economies obtained are considerable, both in terms of energy consumption (kW h) and peak demand (kW) reduction. When compared with higher income typical users of solar water heating technologies, these economies represent a relatively higher benefit, both for the low-income population, as well as for the utilities involved. Our results also show that the avoided power costs , a benefit for the distribution utility company, might be more substantial than the avoided energy costs , a benefit for the end user. In the energy constrained on-peak hours period, the utility company might benefit from being able to sell this energy to other higher paying tariff consumers.
[1]
Tilak T. Chandratilleke,et al.
Economic evaluation of a solar water heating system
,
1987
.
[2]
Emmanuel G. Koukios,et al.
The effect of payback time on solar hot water systems diffusion: the case of Greece
,
2005
.
[3]
Roberto Lamberts,et al.
Development of envelope efficiency labels for commercial buildings: Effect of different variables on electricity consumption
,
2008
.
[4]
Suani Teixeira Coelho,et al.
How adequate policies can push renewables
,
2004
.
[5]
Soteris A. Kalogirou,et al.
Environmental benefits of domestic solar energy systems
,
2004
.
[6]
Racine Tadeu Araújo Prado,et al.
Assessment of energy efficiency in electric storage water heaters
,
2008
.
[7]
S. L. Abreu,et al.
Uncertainty in economical analysis of solar water heating and photovoltaic systems
,
2001
.
[8]
Lin Wenxian,et al.
The solar water heating system with natural circulation assisted by an auxiliary electric heater—performance modeling
,
1991
.
[9]
Kenneth Gillingham.
Economic efficiency of solar hot water policy in New Zealand
,
2009
.
[10]
B. Sudhakara Reddy,et al.
Electrical vs solar water heater: A case study
,
1995
.
[11]
Luiz Pinguelli Rosa,et al.
The Brazilian energy crisis and a study to support building efficiency legislation
,
2004
.
[12]
M. R. Abou-Zeid,et al.
Economic evaluation and optimization of solar systems for space and domestic water heating
,
1983
.
[13]
P. T. Tsilingiris.
Towards making solar water heating technology feasible—the polymer solar collector approach
,
1999
.
[14]
Arthouros Zervos,et al.
Cost benefit analysis for solar water heating systems
,
2001
.
[15]
Rick Diamond,et al.
Domestic hot water consumption in four low-income apartment buildings
,
1987
.
[16]
Juan P. L. C. Salazar.
Economia de energia e redução do pico da curva de demanda para consumidores de baixa renda por agregação de energia solar térmica
,
2004
.