Model checking dependability attributes of wireless group communication

Models used for the analysis of dependability and performance attributes of communication protocols often abstract considerably from the details of the actual protocol. These models often consist of concurrent sub-models and this may make it hard to judge whether their behaviour is faithfully reflecting the protocol. In this paper, we show how model checking of continuous-time Markov chains, generated from high-level specifications, facilitates the analysis of both correctness and dependability attributes. We illustrate this by revisiting a dependability analysis as stated in A. Coccoli et al. (2001)of a variant of the central access protocol of the IEEE 802.11 standard for wireless local area networks. This variant has been developed to support real-time group communication between autonomous mobile stations. Correctness and dependability properties are formally characterised using continuous stochastic logic and are automatically verified by the ETMCC model checker. The models used are specified as stochastic activity nets.

[1]  William H. Sanders,et al.  The Möbius Framework and Its Implementation , 2002, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[2]  Andrea Bondavalli,et al.  Analysis of group communication protocols to assess quality of service properties , 2000, Proceedings. Fifth IEEE International Symposium on High Assurance Systems Engineering (HASE 2000).

[3]  M.A. Qureshi,et al.  The UltraSAN Modeling Environment , 1995, Perform. Evaluation.

[4]  Andrea Bondavalli,et al.  Analysis and estimation of the quality of service of group communication protocols , 2001, Fourth IEEE International Symposium on Object-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing. ISORC 2001.

[5]  Marta Z. Kwiatkowska,et al.  Probabilistic Model Checking of the IEEE 802.11 Wireless Local Area Network Protocol , 2002, PAPM-PROBMIV.

[6]  L. B. Milstein,et al.  On the accuracy of a first-order Markov model for data transmission on fading channels , 1995, Proceedings of ICUPC '95 - 4th IEEE International Conference on Universal Personal Communications.

[7]  Andreas Mitschele-Thiel.  Systems Engineering with SDL: Developing Performance-Critical Communication Systems , 2001 .

[8]  Håkan L. S. Younes,et al.  Probabilistic Verification of Discrete Event Systems Using Acceptance Sampling , 2002, CAV.

[9]  Holger Hermanns,et al.  Interactive Markov Chains , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[10]  Christel Baier,et al.  Automated Performance and Dependability Evaluation Using Model Checking , 2002, Performance.

[11]  Holger Hermanns,et al.  A tool for model-checking Markov chains , 2003, International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer.

[12]  Marta Z. Kwiatkowska,et al.  Probabilistic symbolic model checking with PRISM: a hybrid approach , 2004, International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer.

[13]  Robert K. Brayton,et al.  Model-checking continuous-time Markov chains , 2000, TOCL.

[14]  Edgar Nett,et al.  Efficient Reliable Real-Time Group Communication for Wireless Local Area Networks , 1999, EDCC.

[15]  Andrea Bondavalli,et al.  QoS Analysis of Group Communication Protocols in Wireless Environment , 2002 .

[16]  William H. Sanders,et al.  Reduced Base Model Construction Methods for Stochastic Activity Networks , 1991, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[17]  Christel Baier,et al.  Approximate Symbolic Model Checking of Continuous-Time Markov Chains , 1999, CONCUR.

[18]  Stefan Schemmer,et al.  Zuverlässige Echtzeit-Gruppenkommunikation auf einem lokalen Funknetz , 2000, GMD research series.

[19]  Joost-Pieter Katoen,et al.  Model-checking large structured Markov chains , 2003, J. Log. Algebraic Methods Program..

[20]  Stephan Merz,et al.  Model Checking , 2000 .