Plastic defence expression in plants

Phenotypic plasticity is the ability of an organism to express different phenotypes in response to changing environments and becomes particularly obvious when plants alter their transcriptome after enemy attack. The resulting alterations affect the metabolic, chemical and morphological phenotype and cause resistance or tolerance phenomena, which allow plants to main high fitness in the presence of enemies. Volatiles released from damaged plants can be received by their neighbours or undamaged parts of the same plant to mount an adequate level of resistance and thereby add a further level of phenotypic plasticity. The induced defence responses also include attraction of the third trophic level and, thus, dramatic changes of the ‘extended phenotype’ of the plant, that is, its surrounding fauna. The underlying interactions are, at least partly, under the control of the plant and, thus, subject to co-evolutionary processes. Fitness costs are a common explanation for the evolution of inducible resistance expression. However, variability in the resistance phenotype can per se be beneficial, because it makes counter-adaptations by the plants’ enemies more difficult. In the case of indirect defences, which are mediated by plant-carnivore mutualisms, signal reliability and reciprocal responses among phenotypically plastic partners appear necessary prerequisites for their evolutionary stabilisation. The expression of resistance and tolerance is induced by enemy attack but is also under control by abiotic factors, such as resource supply, and by biotic parameters, such as current and anticipated competition, efficiency of the expressed resistance and ontogenetic stage. All these levels of plasticity help plants to survive as sessile organisms in a rapidly changing environment and in the presence of mobile enemies.

[1]  Monika Hilker,et al.  Early Herbivore Alert: Insect Eggs Induce Plant Defense , 2006, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[2]  M. Heil,et al.  Induction of two indirect defences benefits Lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus, Fabaceae) in nature , 2004 .

[3]  J. Gowda Physical and chemical response of juvenile Acacia tortilis trees to browsing. Experimental evidence , 1997 .

[4]  Joost T. van Dongen,et al.  SNF1-related kinases allow plants to tolerate herbivory by allocating carbon to roots , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  T. C. Turlings,et al.  Adult experience modifies attraction of the leafminer parasitoidOpius dissitus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to volatile semiochemicals , 1992, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[6]  J. Bronstein The exploitation of mutualisms , 2001 .

[7]  M. Heil Damaged-self recognition in plant herbivore defence. , 2009, Trends in plant science.

[8]  J. Martínková,et al.  Compensation of seed production after severe injury in the short-lived herb Barbarea vulgaris , 2008 .

[9]  E. Simms Defining tolerance as a norm of reaction , 2000, Evolutionary Ecology.

[10]  Eran Pichersky,et al.  The formation and function of plant volatiles: perfumes for pollinator attraction and defense. , 2002, Current opinion in plant biology.

[11]  P. Dalin,et al.  Leaf trichome responses to herbivory in willows: induction, relaxation and costs. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[12]  P. Rautio,et al.  Tolerance of a perennial herb, Pimpinella saxifraga, to simulated flower herbivory and grazing: immediate repair of injury or postponed reproduction? , 2009, Plant Ecology.

[13]  R. Karban,et al.  RELAXATION OF INDUCED INDIRECT DEFENSES OF ACACIAS FOLLOWING EXCLUSION OF MAMMALIAN HERBIVORES , 2004 .

[14]  J. Gershenzon,et al.  The function of terpene natural products in the natural world. , 2007, Nature chemical biology.

[15]  Extrafloral nectary phenotypic plasticity is damage- and resource-dependent in Vicia faba , 2006, Biology Letters.

[16]  M. Heil,et al.  Nectar chemistry is tailored for both attraction of mutualists and protection from exploiters , 2009, Plant signaling & behavior.

[17]  E. Reekie,et al.  Pattern of defoliation and its effect on photosynthetic capacity in Oenothera biennis , 1995 .

[18]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Plant responses to insect herbivory: the emerging molecular analysis. , 2002, Annual review of plant biology.

[19]  R. Kaartinen,et al.  A parasitoid wasp uses landmarks while monitoring potential resources , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Tolerance in plant ecology and evolution: toward a more unified theory of plant–herbivore interaction , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[21]  T. Köllner,et al.  Costs of induced volatile production in maize , 2004 .

[22]  J. Kirchner,et al.  EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS OF PATHOGEN RESISTANCE AND TOLERANCE , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[23]  A. Agrawal Specificity of induced resistance in wild radish: causes and consequences for two specialist and two generalist caterpillars , 2000 .

[24]  Richard M. Caprioli,et al.  Defensive Function of Herbivore-Induced Plant Volatile Emissions in Nature , 2022 .

[25]  B. W. Shirley Flavonoids in seeds and grains: physiological function, agronomic importance and the genetics of biosynthesis , 1998, Seed Science Research.

[26]  T. Korves,et al.  A Developmental Response to Pathogen Infection in Arabidopsis1 , 2003, Plant Physiology.

[27]  S. Sultan Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history. , 2000, Trends in plant science.

[28]  R. Tollrian,et al.  The Ecology and Evolution of Inducible Defenses , 1990, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[29]  T. Oliver,et al.  Tolerance traits and the stability of mutualism , 2009 .

[30]  T. Eulgem,et al.  The transcriptome of Arabidopsis thaliana during systemic acquired resistance , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[31]  M. Heil Ecological costs of induced resistance. , 2002, Current opinion in plant biology.

[32]  D. F. Rhoades Responses of Alder and Willow to Attack by Tent Caterpillars and Webworms: Evidence for Pheromonal Sensitivity of Willows , 1983 .

[33]  Xin Li,et al.  Plant Innate Immunity , 2009 .

[34]  M. Heil Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[35]  G. Felix,et al.  Purification, immunoassay and characterization of an abundant, cytokinin-regulated polypeptide in cultured tobacco tissues , 1985, Planta.

[36]  M. Dicke Evolution of Induced Indirect Defense of Plants , 1999 .

[37]  Jamie Goode,et al.  Insect-plant interactions and induced plant defence , 1999 .

[38]  R. P. Doss,et al.  Bruchins: insect-derived plant regulators that stimulate neoplasm formation. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  J. Bergelson,et al.  SAR INCREASES FITNESS OF ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA IN THE PRESENCE OF NATURAL BACTERIAL PATHOGENS , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[40]  Bruce A. McPheron,et al.  Interactions Among Three Trophic Levels: Influence of Plants on Interactions Between Insect Herbivores and Natural Enemies , 1980 .

[41]  R. Dietrich,et al.  Constitutive and induced resistance to pathogens in Arabidopsis thaliana depends on nitrogen supply , 2004 .

[42]  R. Creelman,et al.  BIOSYNTHESIS AND ACTION OF JASMONATES IN PLANTS. , 1997, Annual review of plant physiology and plant molecular biology.

[43]  J. Carlson,et al.  Within-plant signalling via volatiles overcomes vascular constraints on systemic signalling and primes responses against herbivores. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[44]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Fitness costs of induced resistance: emerging experimental support for a slippery concept. , 2002, Trends in plant science.

[45]  J. Bohlmann,et al.  Insect-Induced Conifer Defense. White Pine Weevil and Methyl Jasmonate Induce Traumatic Resinosis, de Novo Formed Volatile Emissions, and Accumulation of Terpenoid Synthase and Putative Octadecanoid Pathway Transcripts in Sitka Spruce1[w] , 2005, Plant Physiology.

[46]  L. Clement,et al.  Divergent investment strategies of Acacia myrmecophytes and the coexistence of mutualists and exploiters , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  M. Berenbaum,et al.  Comparison of photosynthetic damage from arthropod herbivory and pathogen infection in understory hardwood saplings , 2006, Oecologia.

[48]  E. Mondor,et al.  Conspicuous extra‐floral nectaries are inducible in Vicia faba , 2003 .

[49]  W. Lewis,et al.  Exploitation of Herbivore-Induced Plant Odors by Host-Seeking Parasitic Wasps , 1990, Science.

[50]  T. Juenger,et al.  The evolution of tolerance to damage in Gentianella campestris: natural selection and the quantitative genetics of tolerance , 2000, Evolutionary Ecology.

[51]  C. Schlichting,et al.  Phenotypic plasticity: an evolving plant character , 1986 .

[52]  J. Fornoni,et al.  Host tolerance does not impose selection on natural enemies. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[53]  C. Ballaré,et al.  Remote sensing of future competitors: impacts on plant defenses. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  J. Ebel PHYTOALEXIN SYNTHESIS: THE BIOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF THE INDUCTION PROCESS , 1986 .

[55]  Y. Onoda,et al.  Systemic induced resistance: a risk-spreading strategy in clonal plant networks? , 2008, The New phytologist.

[56]  Thomas P. Clausen,et al.  DIVERSITY OF STRUCTURE AND ANTIHERBIVORE ACTIVITY IN CONDENSED TANNINS , 1997 .

[57]  E. Simms,et al.  COSTS AND BENEFITS OF PLANT RESPONSES TO DISEASE: RESISTANCE AND TOLERANCE , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[58]  Andrew J. Heidel,et al.  Fitness Benefits of Systemic Acquired Resistance During Hyaloperonospora parasitica Infection in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2006, Genetics.

[59]  J. Fornoni,et al.  Quantitative genetics of plant tolerance and resistance against natural enemies of two natural populations of Datura stramonium , 2003 .

[60]  I. Baldwin Jasmonate-induced responses are costly but benefit plants under attack in native populations. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  M. V. Price,et al.  Life-history consequences of vegetative damage in scarlet gilia, a monocarpic plant , 2007 .

[62]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Molecular Interactions between the Specialist Herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and Its Natural Host Nicotiana attenuata. VII. Changes in the Plant's Proteome1[W] , 2006, Plant Physiology.

[63]  J. Fornoni,et al.  The Evolution of Resistance and Tolerance to Herbivores , 2007 .

[64]  E. Gianoli,et al.  Damage and shade enhance climbing and promote associational resistance in a climbing plant , 2007 .

[65]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Induced responses to herbivory and increased plant performance , 1998, Science.

[66]  J. Bergelson,et al.  Costs of induced responses in plants , 2003 .

[67]  S. Dorn,et al.  Herbivore‐induced emissions of maize volatiles repel the corn leaf aphid, Rhopalosiphum maidis , 1998 .

[68]  R. Hammerschmidt PHYTOALEXINS: What Have We Learned After 60 Years? , 1999, Annual review of phytopathology.

[69]  K. Boege Influence of plant ontogeny on compensation to leaf damage. , 2005, American journal of botany.

[70]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Molecular interactions between the specialist herbivore Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) and its natural host Nicotiana attenuata. I. Large-scale changes in the accumulation of growth- and defense-related plant mRNAs. , 2001, Plant physiology.

[71]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Overcompensation of plants in response to herbivory and the by-product benefits of mutualism. , 2000, Trends in plant science.

[72]  W. J. Lewis,et al.  Extrafloral Nectar, Honeydew, and Sucrose Effects on Searching Behavior and Efficiency of Microplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in Cotton , 1997 .

[73]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Defensive function of herbivore-induced plant volatile emissions in nature. , 2001, Science.

[74]  A. Agrawal Future directions in the study of induced plant responses to herbivory , 2005 .

[75]  V. Sadras,et al.  Photosynthetic Response of Cotton to Spider Mite Damage: Interaction with Light and Compensatory Mechanisms , 2007 .

[76]  S. Chamberlain,et al.  Quantitative synthesis of context dependency in ant-plant protection mutualisms. , 2009, Ecology.

[77]  Hur-Song Chang,et al.  Transcriptional Profiling Reveals Novel Interactions between Wounding, Pathogen, Abiotic Stress, and Hormonal Responses in Arabidopsis1,212 , 2002, Plant Physiology.

[78]  R. Zamora,et al.  Biomass allocation and growth responses of Scots pine saplings to simulated herbivory depend on plant age and light availability , 2008, Plant Ecology.

[79]  D. Ward,et al.  The effects of herbivory and resource variability on the production of a second inflorescence by the desert lily, Pancratium sickenbergeri , 2006, Plant Ecology.

[80]  L. Rodriguez-Saona,et al.  Herbivore-Induced Volatiles in the Perennial Shrub, Vaccinium corymbosum, and Their Role in Inter-branch Signaling , 2009, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[81]  Anthony L. Schilmiller,et al.  Systemic signaling in the wound response. , 2005, Current opinion in plant biology.

[82]  I. Baldwin The alkaloidal responses of wild tobacco to real and simulated herbivory , 1988, Oecologia.

[83]  A. Packer,et al.  Simulated herbivory induces extrafloral nectary production in Prunus avium , 2008 .

[84]  T. Juenger,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF COMPENSATION TO HERBIVORY IN SCARLET GILIA, IPOMOPSIS AGGREGATA: HERBIVORE‐IMPOSED NATURAL SELECTION AND THE QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF TOLERANCE , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[85]  N. Turner,et al.  CO2 assimilation of primary and regrowth foliage of red maple (Acer rubrum L.) and red oak (Quercus rubra L.): response to defoliation , 1983, Oecologia.

[86]  D. Walters,et al.  Ecological Consequences of Plant Defence Signalling , 2009 .

[87]  B Fiala,et al.  Extrafloral nectar production of the ant-associated plant, Macaranga tanarius, is an induced, indirect, defensive response elicited by jasmonic acid. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[88]  C. Rodriguez‐Saona,et al.  Herbivore‐induced responses and patch heterogeneity affect abundance of arthropods on plants , 2005 .

[89]  J. Bergelson,et al.  Interactive Effects of Jasmonic Acid, Salicylic Acid, and Gibberellin on Induction of Trichomes in Arabidopsis1 , 2003, Plant Physiology.

[90]  A. Agrawal,et al.  The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[91]  M. Rausher,et al.  VARIATION IN THE DEFENSE STRATEGIES OF PLANTS: ARE RESISTANCE AND TOLERANCE MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE? , 1997 .

[92]  M. Wise,et al.  Effects of Resource Availability on Tolerance of Herbivory: A Review and Assessment of Three Opposing Models , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[93]  C. Smith,et al.  Plant resistance to insects. , 1983, Environmental science & technology.

[94]  J. Ton,et al.  Long-distance signalling in plant defence. , 2008, Trends in plant science.

[95]  Michael D Greenfield,et al.  Wound-Induced Proteinase Inhibitor in Plant Leaves: A Possible Defense Mechanism against Insects , 1972, Science.

[96]  Richard Karban,et al.  Induced Responses to Herbivory , 1997 .

[97]  K. Matsui,et al.  Volatile C6-aldehydes and Allo-ocimene activate defense genes and induce resistance against Botrytis cinerea in Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2005, Plant & cell physiology.

[98]  A. Allison Systemic signalling in the wound response of the tomato plant. , 1997 .

[99]  Anurag A. Agrawal,et al.  Phenotypic Plasticity in the Interactions and Evolution of Species , 2001, Science.

[100]  A. Agrawal,et al.  COSTS OF INDUCED RESPONSES AND TOLERANCE TO HERBIVORY IN MALE AND FEMALE FITNESS COMPONENTS OF WILD RADISH , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[101]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Induced plant defence and the evolution of counter-defences in herbivores , 2002 .

[102]  D. G. Brown,et al.  The cost of plant defense: an experimental analysis with inducible proteinase inhibitors in tomato , 1988, Oecologia.

[103]  J. Schultz,et al.  Rapid Changes in Tree Leaf Chemistry Induced by Damage: Evidence for Communication Between Plants , 1983, Science.

[104]  M. Rausher,et al.  Tradeoff between resistance and tolerance to herbivore damage in a morning glory , 1995, Nature.

[105]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Trade‐offs between the shade‐avoidance response and plant resistance to herbivores? Tests with mutant Cucumis sativus , 2005 .

[106]  C. Pieterse,et al.  Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants. , 2006, Annual review of phytopathology.

[107]  J. Gershenzon,et al.  Protective perfumes: the role of vegetative volatiles in plant defense against herbivores. , 2009, Current opinion in plant biology.

[108]  Recognition of Herbivory-Associated Molecular Patterns , 2008, Plant Physiology.

[109]  Leon G. Higley,et al.  Effects of Insect Herbivory on Physiological and Biochemical (Oxidative Enzyme) Responses of the Halophyte Atriplex subspicata (Chenopodiaceae) , 2006 .

[110]  T. Ohgushi,et al.  Evolution of feeding preference in a leaf beetle: the importance of phenotypic plasticity of a host plant. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[111]  K. Goellner,et al.  Priming: it’s all the world to induced disease resistance , 2008, European Journal of Plant Pathology.

[112]  N. T. Hobbs,et al.  Elk browsing increases aboveground growth of water-stressed willows by modifying plant architecture , 2007, Oecologia.

[113]  Richard Karban,et al.  Explaining evolution of plant communication by airborne signals. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[114]  C. Ryu,et al.  Airborne Induction and Priming of Plant Defenses against a Bacterial Pathogen1[C][OA] , 2009, Plant Physiology.

[115]  K. Linsenmair,et al.  Evolutionary change from induced to constitutive expression of an indirect plant resistance , 2004, Nature.

[116]  M. Heil,et al.  Within-plant signaling by volatiles leads to induction and priming of an indirect plant defense in nature , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[117]  Ilya Raskin,et al.  Airborne signalling by methyl salicylate in plant pathogen resistance , 1997, Nature.

[118]  D. Walters,et al.  Increased photosynthesis and resistance to rust infection in upper, uninfected leaves of rusted broad bean (Vicia faba L.) , 1992 .

[119]  R. Matthews,et al.  Ants. , 1898, Science.

[120]  I. Baldwin,et al.  Why Does Herbivore Attack Reconfigure Primary Metabolism? , 2008, Plant Physiology.

[121]  U. Steiner,et al.  The fitness costs of developmental canalization and plasticity , 2009, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[122]  M. Mescher,et al.  Caterpillar-induced nocturnal plant volatiles repel conspecific females , 2001, Nature.

[123]  D. Cipollini Consequences of the overproduction of methyl jasmonate on seed production, tolerance to defoliation and competitive effect and response of Arabidopsis thaliana. , 2007, The New phytologist.

[124]  D. Pilson The evolution of plant response to herbivory: simultaneously considering resistance and tolerance in Brassica rapa , 2000, Evolutionary Ecology.

[125]  G. Jiang,et al.  Responses of Artemisia frigida Willd. (Compositae) and Leymus chinensis (Trin.) Tzvel. (Poaceae) to sheep saliva , 2007 .

[126]  W. J. Lewis,et al.  Plant production of volatile semiochemicals in response to insect-derived elicitors. , 2007, Novartis Foundation symposium.