Variability in the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification Scale.

The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status (PS) Classification is used worldwide by anesthesia providers as an assessment of the preoperative physical health of patients. This score also has been used in policy-making, performance evaluation, resource allocation, and reimbursement of anesthesia services and frequently is cited in clinical research. The purpose of this study was to assess interrater reliability and describe sources of variability among anesthesia providers in assigning ASA PS scores. A questionnaire with 10 hypothetical patients scenarios was given to 70 anesthesia providers who were asked to assign ASA PS scores in each scenario and to provide rationale for their decisions. The data were summarized and stratified according to nurse anesthetist or anesthesiologist and military or nonmilitary anesthesia providers. We hypothesized there would be no difference between any of the anesthesia provider groups in assignment of ASA PS scores. A lack of interrater reliability in assigning ASA PS scores was demonstrated. There were no significant differences between the anesthesia provider groups. There was no correlation between ASA PS scoring and years practicing or any of the other demographic variables. Several sources of variability were identified: smoking, pregnancy, nature of the surgery, potential difficult airway, and acute injury.

[1]  Meyer Saklad,et al.  GRADING OF PATIENTS FOR SURGICAL PROCEDURES , 1941 .

[2]  M. McAuliffe,et al.  Survey of nurse anesthesia practice, education, and regulation in 96 countries. , 1998, AANA journal.

[3]  R. V. Lourenço,et al.  Deposition and clearance of 2 micron particles in the tracheobronchial tree of normal subjects--smokers and nonsmokers. , 1971, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[4]  S. Ranta,et al.  A survey of the ASA physical status classification: significant variation in allocation among Finnish anaesthesiologists , 1997, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[5]  J. Bayes Asymptomatic smokers: ASA I or II? , 1982, Anesthesiology.

[6]  C. Fletcher,et al.  The diagnosis and prophylaxis of pulmonary complications of surgical operation , 1973, The British journal of surgery.

[7]  P. Lawler,et al.  An assessment of the consistency of ASA physical status classification allocation , 1995, Anaesthesia.

[8]  Stephen Dubin How many subjects? Statistical power analysis in research , 1990 .

[9]  W. Parmley,et al.  Hemodynamic and vascular effects of active and passive smoking. , 1995, American heart journal.

[10]  E. Spitznagel,et al.  ASA Physical Status Classifications: A Study of Consistency of Ratings , 1978, Anesthesiology.

[11]  J Milic-Emili,et al.  Measurement of "closing volume" as a simple and sensitive test for early detection of small airway disease. , 1972, The American journal of medicine.

[12]  M. Rosen,et al.  Shnider and Levinson's Anesthesia for Obstetrics , 2002 .

[13]  L. Tiret,et al.  Prediction of outcome of anaesthesia in patients over 40 years: a multifactorial risk index. , 1988, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  H. Adams,et al.  The International Cooperative Study on the Timing of Aneurysm Surgery. Part 1: Overall management results. , 1990, Journal of neurosurgery.

[15]  M. McAuliffe,et al.  Countries where anesthesia is administered by nurses. , 1996, AANA journal.

[16]  A. Keats,et al.  The risk of anesthesia. , 1970, Clinical engineering information service.