Effects of frequency and amplitude modulation on the pitch of a complex tone with a mistuned harmonic.

It has previously been found that when a single low-numbered harmonic of a complex tone is progressively mistuned, for mistunings up to about 3%, the pitch of the complex changes in the direction of the mistuning but for larger mistunings (by about 8%) the pitch returns to its original value. This result is compatible with the operation of a mechanism such as a graded harmonic sieve, which can reject from the calculation of pitch those frequency components that are implausibly distant from a harmonic frequency. The first experiment shows that the tolerance of such a sieve is increased when all the components of the complex tone (including the mistuned component) share a common pattern of frequency modulation at a rate of 6 Hz. The second experiment shows that the tolerance of the sieve is not increased when the components share a common pattern of amplitude modulation at 17 Hz. The third experiment replicates these findings and further shows that the increase in sieve tolerance for FM, but not for AM, occurs at both 6 and at 17 Hz.

[1]  W A Yost,et al.  Across-critical-band processing of amplitude-modulated tones. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  B C Moore,et al.  Modulation discrimination interference and auditory grouping. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[3]  W A Yost,et al.  Modulation interference in detection and discrimination of amplitude modulation. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Frequency modulation characteristics of sustained /a/ sung in vocal vibrato. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  A J Houtsma,et al.  Pitch identification of simultaneous dichotic two-tone complexes. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  R B Gardner,et al.  Grouping of vowel harmonics by frequency modulation: Absence of effects on phonemic categorization , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  J H Grose,et al.  Comodulation masking release and auditory grouping. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Joseph W. Hall,et al.  Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  A. Bregman,et al.  Fusion of auditory components: Effects of the frequency of amplitude modulation , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  S. McAdams Segregation of concurrent sounds. I: Effects of frequency modulation coherence. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  Tom R. Gaunt,et al.  Across-channel Masking of Changes in Modulation Depth for Amplitude- and Frequency-modulated Signals , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[12]  L. Demany,et al.  The effect of vibrato on the recognition of masked vowels , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  R. Carlyon,et al.  Discriminating between coherent and incoherent frequency modulation of complex tones. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  C. Darwin,et al.  Grouping in pitch perception: effects of onset asynchrony and ear of presentation of a mistuned component. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  J. Culling,et al.  Auditory segregation of competing voices: absence of effects of FM or AM coherence. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[16]  J W Hall,et al.  Comodulation masking release for speech stimuli. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Quentin Summerfield Roles of Harmonicity and Coherent Frequency Modulation in Auditory Grouping. , 1992 .

[18]  C. Darwin,et al.  Effects of onset asynchrony on pitch perception: adaptation or grouping? , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  R. B. Gardner,et al.  Perceptual grouping of formants with static and dynamic differences in fundamental frequency , 1989 .

[20]  R P Carlyon Further evidence against an across-frequency mechanism specific to the detection of frequency modulation (FM) incoherence between resolved frequency components. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Mary Florentine,et al.  Comodulation masking release for three types of modulator as a function of modulation rate , 1989, Hearing Research.

[22]  T D Carrell,et al.  The effect of amplitude comodulation on auditory object formation in sentence perception , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  Cj. Darwin Listening to two Things at Once , 1992 .

[24]  B. Moore,et al.  Relative dominance of individual partials in determining the pitch of complex tones , 1985 .