Electricity purchase agreements and distributed energy policies for anaerobic digesters

Anaerobic digestion is increasingly recognized for its ability to produce renewable energy and reduce greenhouse gas emissions from livestock operations. In 2010, there were 2645 U.S. dairy farms with herd sizes large enough to support anaerobic digesters, yet only 156 systems were in operation (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), 2010a. Market Opportunities for Biogas Recovery Systems at U.S. Livestock Facilities. AgSTAR Program; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), 2011. Operational Anaerobic Digesters, Sorted by State (Dairy). AgSTAR Program.).11The EPA AgSTAR program considers farm sizes of least 500 cows to be feasible to support an anaerobic digester. This study analyzes the net present value of digester systems under alternative electricity purchase agreements and how returns are affected by standby charges, net metering policies and the use of feed-in-tariffs. In order for digester potential to be fully realized on a state or national level, changes to distributed energy policy are required. Results indicated that standby charges can reduce revenues from offsetting electricity by an average of nearly 20%. Net metering rules limit participation among larger farms and negatively affect profitability by restricting engine–generator size. Lastly, the effectiveness of a fixed price feed-in-tariff policy for digesters is significantly affected by project size differentiation. Digester energy policies are similar nationwide, making this study useful for government regulatory agencies and digester owners throughout the U.S.

[1]  A. Wilkie,et al.  Economic Feasibility of Anaerobic Digestion To Produce Electricity on Florida Dairy Farms , 2019, EDIS.

[2]  Anthony R. Olsen,et al.  Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. , 2013 .

[3]  Arne Klein Feed-in Tariff Designs: Options to Support Electricity Generation from Renewable Energy Sources , 2012 .

[4]  R. Parsons,et al.  Economic feasibility of converting cow manure to electricity: a case study of the CVPS Cow Power program in Vermont. , 2011, Journal of dairy science.

[5]  Karlynn Cory,et al.  Policymaker's Guide to Feed-in Tariff Policy Design , 2010 .

[6]  Mark Bolinger Revealing the Hidden Value that the Federal Investment Tax Credit and Treasury Cash Grant Provide To Community Wind Projects , 2011 .

[7]  P. Lusk,et al.  Methane Recovery from Animal Manures The Current Opportunities Casebook , 1994 .

[8]  W. Lazarus Farm-based anaerobic digesters as an energy and odor control technology: Background and policy issues , 2010 .

[9]  Steven I. Safferman,et al.  Screening co‐digestion of food waste water with manure for biogas production , 2009 .

[10]  S. Maithel Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy , 2008 .

[11]  R. T. Wilson Livestock Production Systems , 1995 .

[12]  William F. Lazarus,et al.  The economics of anaerobic digester operation on a Minnesota dairy farm , 2007 .

[13]  J. Hyde,et al.  Investing in Methane Digesters on Pennsylvania Dairy Farms: Implications of Scale Economies and Environmental Programs , 2008, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[14]  K. Palmer,et al.  Air Emissions of Ammonia and Methane from Livestock Operations: Valuation and Policy Options , 2006, Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association.

[15]  Robert T. Burns,et al.  An analysis of anaerobic digestion system costs on U.S. livestock production systems , 2008 .