Neural correlates of semantic effects on grasping familiar objects

This study used event-related fMRI to explore the neural basis of semantic involvement when performing a visually guided grasping movement. Three types of object images were presented in random order: familiar objects with handles (FH+) familiar objects without handles (FH−) and geometrical objects with a handle-like part (GH+). Subjects were then instructed to configure an appropriate hand shape for grasping the object. Common activations were found for all event types when contrasted with baseline. Activation of the anterior part of the rostral cingulate motor area was detected for only the FH+ condition and these results imply that the appropriate selection of multiple motor schemata took place in this region.

[1]  J. Noth,et al.  Precision grip deficits in cerebellar disorders in man , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  J. Decety,et al.  Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The dynamics of object-selective activation correlate with recognition performance in humans , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  R. Johansson,et al.  Cortical activity in precision- versus power-grip tasks: an fMRI study. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Alex Martin,et al.  Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.

[6]  Dae-Shik Kim,et al.  Origin of Negative Blood Oxygenation Level—Dependent fMRI Signals , 2002, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[7]  P. Strick,et al.  Imaging the premotor areas , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  K. Zilles,et al.  Hierarchical Processing of Tactile Shape in the Human Brain , 2001, Neuron.

[9]  R. Ellis,et al.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  C. Mateer,et al.  Utilization Behavior: Clinical Manifestations and Neurological Mechanisms , 2001, Neuropsychology Review.

[11]  M. Hallett,et al.  Functional properties of brain areas associated with motor execution and imagery. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Possible involvement of primary motor cortex in mentally simulated movement: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[13]  C. Gerlacha,et al.  Brain activity related to integrative processes in visual object recognition : bottom-up integration and the modulatory influence of stored knowledge , 2002 .

[14]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Visual affordances direct action: neuropsychological evidence from manual interference. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[15]  S M Kosslyn,et al.  Identifying objects seen from different viewpoints. A PET investigation. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  K Verfaillie,et al.  A corpus of 714 full-color images of depth-rotated objects , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  E. Bullmore,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of implicit-motion perception or ‘representational momentum’ , 2000, Current Biology.

[18]  Sarah H. Creem,et al.  Grasping objects by their handles: a necessary interaction between cognition and action. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  L. Parsons,et al.  Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET , 1995, Nature.

[20]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[22]  S. H. Johnson,et al.  Thinking ahead: the case for motor imagery in prospective judgements of prehension , 2000, Cognition.