Task allocation in ant colonies within variable environments (a study of temporal polyethism: Experimental)

We briefly review the literature on the division of labour in ant colonies with monomorphic worker populations, and show that there are anomalies in current theories and in the interpretation of existing data sets. Most ant colonies are likely to be in unstable situations and therefore we doubt if an age-based division of labour can be sufficiently flexible. We present data for a type of small ant colony in a highly seasonal environment, concentrating on individually marked older workers. We show that contrary to expectation such workers undertake a wide variety of tasks and can even retain their ability to reproduce, even whilst younger workers are actively foraging. Our analysis shows that old workers occupy four distinct spatial stations within the nest and that these are related to the tasks they perform. We suggest that correlations between age and task in many ant colonies might simply be based on ants foraging for work, i.e. actively seeking tasks to perform and remaining faithful to these as long as they are profitably employed. For this reason, employed older workers effectively displace unemployed younger workers into other tasks. In a companion paper, Tofts 1993,Bull. math. Biol. develops an algorithm that shows how foraging for work can be an efficient and flexible mechanism for the division of labour in social insects. The algorithm creates a correlation between age and task purely as a by-product of itsmodus operandi.

[1]  Edward O. Wilson,et al.  The Ergonomics of Caste in the Social Insects , 1968, The American Naturalist.

[2]  B. Silverman Density estimation for statistics and data analysis , 1986 .

[3]  Nigel R. Franks,et al.  Synchronization of the behaviour within nests of the ant Leptothorax acervorum (fabricius)—I. Discovering the phenomenon and its relation to the level of starvation , 1990 .

[4]  Robin Sibson,et al.  A Seamed Quadratic Element for Contouring , 1981, Comput. J..

[5]  Chris Tofts Algorithms for task allocation in ants. (A study of temporal polyethism: Theory) , 1993 .

[6]  Dominique Fresneau,et al.  An automated photographic technique for behavioural investigations of social insects , 1986, Behavioural Processes.

[7]  E. Wilson The Insect Societies , 1974 .

[8]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Factors determining polyethism in social insects , 1987 .

[9]  A. Bourke Worker Reproduction in the Higher Eusocial Hymenoptera , 1988, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[10]  M. West-Eberhard Sexual selection, social competition and evolution , 1979 .

[11]  W. Hamilton Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  E. Wilson,et al.  Caste and ecology in the social insects. , 1979, Monographs in population biology.

[13]  Edward O. Wilson,et al.  Success and Dominance in Ecosystems: The Case of the Social Insects , 1991 .

[14]  Robin Sibson,et al.  Computing Dirichlet Tessellations in the Plane , 1978, Comput. J..

[15]  J. Murray,et al.  A mathematical model of self-organized pattern formation on the combs of honeybee colonies , 1990 .

[16]  T. Seeley,et al.  Honeybee Ecology: A Study of Adaptation in Social Life , 1985 .

[17]  P. J. Clark,et al.  Distance to Nearest Neighbor as a Measure of Spatial Relationships in Populations , 1954 .

[18]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  The dynamics of collective sorting robot-like ants and ant-like robots , 1991 .