Scale effect on runoff from experimental plots to catchments in agricultural areas in Normandy

Abstract Overland flow and soil erosion models working with coarse to medium resolution input data for prediction on large areas often rely on high resolution calibration and evaluation datasets collected for smaller areas. Therefore, one important issue is to assess to what extent process identification and parameterisation carried at one scale can be extrapolated to a different scale. The objective of this paper is to identify the nature and the cause of variation in the runoff response for areas ranging from plots to 10 km 2 catchments on the basis of extensive multi-scale field information gathered on arable lands of the loam belt in Northern France. Three datasets are studied: data from plots of ca. 500 m 2 consisting of either 100 or 90% arable land; data from a catchment of ca. 90 ha with either 96 or 94% arable land; and data from a catchment of ca. 1100 ha with ca. 80% arable land. For the three datasets mean slope gradient and soil types are similar. Between the three datasets, a significant decrease in the runoff coefficient is observed as the area increases. This trend, which has already been observed by many researchers, confirms that a catchment cannot be considered as the sum of individual fields. A simple distributed approach, based on the dominant processes, that defines the infiltration parameters at the field scale (allowing reinfiltration) and accounts for natural or human induced preferential pathways within the catchments could reproduce the observed runoff coefficients. In this context, the scaling transition between the plots and the 10 km 2 catchment can thus be considered in terms of connectivity between the ‘infiltrating’ and ‘runoff producing’ areas. However, if we select data with contrasting land use for the three datasets, it shows that the variations between the different runoff coefficients can be smoothed out or accentuated. Furthermore it demonstrates the importance of possessing a database that covers a large range of situations when studying spatial scaling linkages in order to be able to distinguish between the different factors. Finally these results are compared with results from a study where rainfall–runoff events were simulated on 40 selected catchments of ca. 10 km 2 in Hte-Normandie (France). For catchments of this scale, it appears that the percentage of arable land is a driving factor in the runoff response whatever its location within the catchment. One explanation being that connectivity variability can be significant between the plot scale and the catchment scale but is relatively less important between different 10 km 2 cultivated catchments.

[1]  H. Benkhadra Battance, ruissellement et erosion diffuse sur les sols limoneux cultives determinisme et transfert d'echelle de la parcelle au petit bassin versant , 1997 .

[2]  Veronique Souchere,et al.  Incorporating soil surface crusting processes in an expert-based runoff model: Sealing and Transfer by Runoff and Erosion related to Agricultural Management , 2002 .

[3]  John A. Dearing,et al.  Soil erosion on agricultural land. , 1990 .

[4]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Scale issues in hydrological modelling , 1995 .

[5]  Olivier Maquaire,et al.  Soil surface characteristics influence on infiltration in black marls: application to the Super‐Sauze earthflow (southern Alps, France) , 2003 .

[6]  R. Schulze Transcending scales of space and time in impact studies of climate and climate change on agrohydrological responses , 2000 .

[7]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Scale issues in hydrological modelling: A review , 1995 .

[8]  Mark A. Nearing,et al.  Variability in Soil Erosion Data from Replicated Plots , 1999 .

[9]  N. C. Van de Giesen,et al.  Scale effects of Hortonian overland flow and rainfall–runoff dynamics in a West African catena landscape , 2000 .

[10]  V. Souchère,et al.  Rill erosion on cultivated hillslopes during two extreme rainfall events in Normandy, France , 2002 .

[11]  A. Joel,et al.  Measurement of surface water runoff from plots of two different sizes , 2002 .

[12]  M. Sivapalan,et al.  Scale problems in hydrology: Contributions of the robertson workshop , 1995 .

[13]  Yolanda Cantón,et al.  Hydrological and erosion response of a badlands system in semiarid SE Spain , 2001 .

[14]  L. H. Cammeraat A review of two strongly contrasting geomorphological systems within the context of scale , 2002 .

[15]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[16]  V. Souchère,et al.  Sediment concentration in interrill flow: interactions between soil surface conditions, vegetation and rainfall , 2002 .

[17]  G. R. Foster,et al.  A Process-Based Soil Erosion Model for USDA-Water Erosion Prediction Project Technology , 1989 .

[18]  Olivier Cerdan,et al.  Modelling interrill erosion in small cultivated catchments , 2002 .

[19]  F. Papy,et al.  Influence des états de surface du territoire agricole sur le déclenchement des inondations catastrophiques , 1991 .

[20]  John N. Quinton,et al.  Modelling Methodology for Soil Erosion Assessment and Soil Conservation Design: The EUROSEM Approach , 1994 .

[21]  A. D. Roo,et al.  Flooding of property by runoff from agricultural land in northwestern Europe , 1994 .

[22]  Hans-Jörg Vogel,et al.  Moving through scales of flow and transport in soil , 2003 .

[23]  François Papy,et al.  An approach to the assessment of erosion forms and erosion risk on agricultural land in the Northern Paris Basin, France. , 1990 .

[24]  Nicolas Baghdadi,et al.  Remote-sensing data as an alternative input for the ‘STREAM’ runoff model , 2005 .

[25]  Y. Le Bissonnais,et al.  Crusting, runoff and sheet erosion on silty loamy soils at various scales and upscaling from m2 to small catchments , 1998 .

[26]  M. Kirkby From Plot to Continent: Reconciling Fine and Coarse Scale Erosion Models , 2001 .

[27]  V. Souchère,et al.  Effects of tillage on runoff directions: consequences on runoff contributing area within agricultural catchments , 1998 .

[28]  D. Boer Hierarchies and spatial scale in process geomorphology: a review , 1992 .

[29]  Tammo S. Steenhuis,et al.  Scale effects of Hortonian overland flow and rainfall‐runoff dynamics: laboratory validation of a process‐based model , 2002 .

[30]  P. Chevallier,et al.  Land use change effects on runoff and erosion from plot to catchment scale on the basaltic plateau of Southern Brazil , 1999 .

[31]  Olivier Cerdan,et al.  Grass strip effects on runoff and soil loss , 2004 .

[32]  A. Roy,et al.  A study on the effect of spatial scale on the parameters of a sediment transport equation for sheetwash , 1996 .

[33]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Scaling in hydrology , 2001 .