Chemical master versus chemical langevin for first-order reaction networks

Markov jump processes are widely used to model interacting species in circumstances where discreteness and stochasticity are relevant. Such models have been particularly successful in computational cell biology, and in this case, the interactions are typically rst-order. The Chemical Langevin Equation is a stochastic dierential equation that can be regarded as an approximation to the underlying jump process. In particular, the Chemical Langevin Equation allows simulations to be performed more eectively. In this work, we obtain expressions for the rst and second moments of the Chemical Langevin Equation for a generic rst-order reaction network. Moreover, we show that these moments exactly match those of the under-lying jump process. Hence, in terms of means, variances and correlations, the Chemical Langevin Equation is an excellent proxy for the Chemical Master Equation. Our work assumes that a unique solution exists for the Chemical Langevin Equation. We also show that the moment matching re- sult extends to the case where a gene regulation model of Raser and O'Shea (Science, 2004) is replaced by a hybrid model that mixes elements of the Master and Langevin equations. We nish with numerical experiments on a dimerization model that involves second order reactions, showing that the two regimes continue to give similar results.

[1]  Desmond J. Higham,et al.  Chemical Master Equation and Langevin regimes for a gene transcription model , 2008, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[2]  Darren J. Wilkinson Stochastic Modelling for Systems Biology , 2006 .

[3]  X. Mao,et al.  Stochastic Differential Equations and Applications , 1998 .

[4]  Desmond J. Higham,et al.  Modeling and Simulating Chemical Reactions , 2008, SIAM Rev..

[5]  Kevin Burrage,et al.  Stochastic approaches for modelling in vivo reactions , 2004, Comput. Biol. Chem..

[6]  Xuerong Mao,et al.  Stochastic Differential Equations With Markovian Switching , 2006 .

[7]  J. Raser,et al.  Control of Stochasticity in Eukaryotic Gene Expression , 2004, Science.

[8]  Nicolas E. Buchler,et al.  Nonlinear protein degradation and the function of genetic circuits. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  M. Thattai,et al.  Intrinsic noise in gene regulatory networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  C Jayaprakash,et al.  The role of dimerization in noise reduction of simple genetic networks. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  D. Gillespie Markov Processes: An Introduction for Physical Scientists , 1991 .

[12]  D. Gillespie,et al.  Stochastic Modeling of Gene Regulatory Networks † , 2005 .

[13]  Pawel Paszek,et al.  Modeling Stochasticity in Gene Regulation: Characterization in the Terms of the Underlying Distribution Function , 2007, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[14]  D. Gillespie A General Method for Numerically Simulating the Stochastic Time Evolution of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1976 .

[15]  Hidde de Jong,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of Genetic Regulatory Systems: A Literature Review , 2002, J. Comput. Biol..

[16]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[17]  H. Othmer,et al.  A stochastic analysis of first-order reaction networks , 2005, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[18]  D. Tranchina,et al.  Stochastic mRNA Synthesis in Mammalian Cells , 2006, PLoS biology.

[19]  D. Gillespie The chemical Langevin equation , 2000 .

[20]  Linda R. Petzold,et al.  Stochastic Modeling of Gene Regulatory Networks y , 2005 .