On Sensor Network Localization Using SDP Relaxation

A Semidefinite Programming (SDP) relaxation is an effective computational method to solve a Sensor Network Localization problem, which attempts to determine the locations of a group of sensors given the distances between some of them [11]. In this paper, we analyze and determine new sufficient conditions and formulations that guarantee that the SDP relaxation is exact, i.e., gives the correct solution. These conditions can be useful for designing sensor networks and managing connectivities in practice. Our main contribution is twofold: We present the first non-asymptotic bound on the connectivity or radio range requirement of the sensors in order to ensure the network is uniquely localizable. Determining this range is a key component in the design of sensor networks, and we provide a result that leads to a correct localization of each sensor, for any number of sensors. Second, we introduce a new class of graphs that can always be correctly localized by an SDP relaxation. Specifically, we show that adding a simple objective function to the SDP relaxation model will ensure that the solution is correct when applied to a triangulation graph. Since triangulation graphs are very sparse, this is informationally efficient, requiring an almost minimal amount of distance information. We also analyze a number objective functions for the SDP relaxation to solve the localization problem for a general graph.

[1]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Further Relaxations of the Semidefinite Programming Approach to Sensor Network Localization , 2008, SIAM J. Optim..

[2]  Michael J. Fischer,et al.  Stably Computable Properties of Network Graphs , 2005, DCOSS.

[3]  Gordon M. Crippen,et al.  Distance Geometry and Molecular Conformation , 1988 .

[4]  Robert Connelly,et al.  Realizability of Graphs , 2007, Discret. Comput. Geom..

[5]  Nathan Krislock,et al.  Explicit Sensor Network Localization using Semidefinite Representations and Clique Reductions , 2009 .

[6]  Bill Jackson,et al.  Egerváry Research Group on Combinatorial Optimization Connected Rigidity Matroids and Unique Realizations of Graphs Connected Rigidity Matroids and Unique Realizations of Graphs , 2022 .

[7]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  GPS-less low-cost outdoor localization for very small devices , 2000, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[8]  Brian D. O. Anderson,et al.  Rigidity, computation, and randomization in network localization , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[9]  Abdo Y. Alfakih,et al.  On the universal rigidity of generic bar frameworks , 2010, Contributions Discret. Math..

[10]  Luís E. T. Rodrigues,et al.  Fast Localized Delaunay Triangulation , 2004, OPODIS.

[11]  Erik D. Demaine,et al.  Mobile-assisted localization in wireless sensor networks , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[12]  Yunhao Liu,et al.  Beyond Trilateration: On the Localizability of Wireless Ad Hoc Networks , 2009, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[13]  BiswasPratik,et al.  Semidefinite programming based algorithms for sensor network localization , 2006 .

[14]  Xiang-Yang Li Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks: Theory and Applications , 2008 .

[15]  Steven J. Gortler,et al.  Characterizing generic global rigidity , 2007, Ad Hoc Networks.

[16]  Brian D. O. Anderson,et al.  A Theory of Network Localization , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[17]  Michael J. Fischer,et al.  Computation in networks of passively mobile finite-state sensors , 2004, PODC '04.

[18]  Henry Wolkowicz,et al.  Solving Euclidean Distance Matrix Completion Problems Via Semidefinite Programming , 1999, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[19]  Xiang-Yang Li,et al.  Localized Delaunay Triangulation with Application in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks , 2003, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst..

[20]  Yinyu Ye,et al.  Semidefinite programming for ad hoc wireless sensor network localization , 2004, Third International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2004. IPSN 2004.

[21]  Mani B. Srivastava,et al.  Dynamic fine-grained localization in Ad-Hoc networks of sensors , 2001, MobiCom '01.

[22]  Paul Tseng,et al.  Second-Order Cone Programming Relaxation of Sensor Network Localization , 2007, SIAM J. Optim..

[23]  Charles J. Colbourn,et al.  Unit disk graphs , 1991, Discret. Math..

[24]  Piotr Indyk,et al.  Low-Dimensional Embedding with Extra Information , 2004, SCG '04.

[25]  Anthony Man-Cho So,et al.  Theory of semidefinite programming for Sensor Network Localization , 2005, SODA '05.

[26]  Adel Javanmard,et al.  Localization from incomplete noisy distance measurements , 2011, ISIT.

[27]  Yinyu Ye,et al.  Semidefinite programming based algorithms for sensor network localization , 2006, TOSN.

[28]  Jie Gao,et al.  Localization and routing in sensor networks by local angle information , 2009, TOSN.

[29]  Bruce Hendrickson,et al.  Conditions for Unique Graph Realizations , 1992, SIAM J. Comput..

[30]  L. El Ghaoui,et al.  Convex position estimation in wireless sensor networks , 2001, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No.01CH37213).

[31]  Anthony Man-Cho So,et al.  Universal Rigidity: Towards Accurate and Efficient Localization of Wireless Networks , 2010, 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[32]  Robert Connelly,et al.  Generic Global Rigidity , 2005, Discret. Comput. Geom..

[33]  Anthony Man-Cho So,et al.  A semidefinite programming approach to tensegrity theory and realizability of graphs , 2006, SODA '06.

[34]  James Aspnes,et al.  On the Computational Complexity of Sensor Network Localization , 2004, ALGOSENSORS.

[35]  Piotr Indyk,et al.  Low-Dimensional Embedding with Extra Information , 2006, Discret. Comput. Geom..