Neural responses to depth-motion stimulation in a horizontally sensitive interneurone in the optic lobe of the blowfly (Phormia terraenovae)

Abstract The neural responses to depth-motion stimulation have been investigated in a higher-order interneurone in the optic lobe of the blowfly. The optical stimulus was generated by an outline square or elements of a square moving in real depth. Extracellular, single-unit recording and signal-averaging techniques show that this neurone is velocity coding assuming different delay constants for the excitatory and inhibitory processes. There is no systematic response to the second derivative but a partial response in the excitatory range to the third derivative of motion. The neurone responses to motion in the horizontal direction but not in the vertical direction. When there is simultaneous motion in the preferred and non-preferred directions the neurone reacts systematically with excitation to motion in depth toward the eye, and with inhibition during motion away from the eye. This response is restricted to the frontal part of the eye while in the periphery excitation and inhibition cancel each other. The status of this neurone in the process of motion perception is discussed.

[1]  H. Eckert,et al.  Response properties of dipteran giant visual interneurones involved in control of optomotor behaviour , 1978, Nature.

[2]  K. Hausen.  Functional Characterization and Anatomical Identification of Motion Sensitive Neurons in the Lobula plate of the Blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala , 1976 .

[3]  W. Metzger,et al.  Tiefenerscheinungen in optischen Bewegungsfeldern , 1935 .

[4]  Cloe Taddei-Ferretti,et al.  Landing Reaction of Musca domestica, IV: A. Monocular and Binocular Vision; B. Relationships between Landing and Optomotor Reactions , 1973, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Teil C: Biochemie, Biophysik, Biologie, Virologie.

[5]  E. S. Eriksson.  A theory of veridical space perception , 1974 .

[6]  L. Goodman.  The Landing Responses of Insects: I. The Landing Response of the Fly, Lucilia Sericata, and Other Calliphorinae , 1960 .

[7]  Über den Einfluß von Größenänderungen auf die scheinbare Tiefe , 1934 .

[8]  C. Wheatstone.  XVIII. Contributions to the physiology of vision. —Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision , 1962, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[9]  E. Sture Eriksson,et al.  Distance perception and the ambiguity of visual stimulation: A theoretical note , 1973 .

[10]  D. Regan,et al.  Neurons in area 18 of cat visual cortex selectively sensitive to changing size: Nonlinear interactions between responses to two edges , 1979, Vision Research.

[11]  Cloe Taddei-Ferretti,et al.  Landing Reaction of Musca domestica , III: Dependence on the Luminous Characteristics of the Stimulus , 1973, Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. Teil C: Biochemie, Biophysik, Biologie, Virologie.

[12]  G. D. Mccann,et al.  Motion detection by interneurons of optic lobes and brain of the flies Calliphora phaenicia and Musca domestica. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  M. Cynader,et al.  Neurones in cat parastriate cortex sensitive to the direction of motion in three‐dimensional space , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  Mandyam V. Srinivasan,et al.  The contrast sensitivity of fly movement-detecting neurons , 1980, Vision Research.

[15]  G. Schlotterer.  Response of the locust descending movement detector neuron to rapidly approaching and withdrawing visual stimuli , 1977 .

[16]  W. H. Ittelson,et al.  Size as a cue to distance; radial motion. , 1951, The American journal of psychology.

[17]  D. Regan,et al.  Looming detectors in the human visual pathway , 1978, Vision Research.

[18]  D. Regan,et al.  Binocular and monocular stimuli for motion in depth: Changing-disparity and changing-size feed the same motion-in-depth stage , 1979, Vision Research.

[19]  S. Zeki.  Cells responding to changing image size and disparity in the cortex of the rhesus monkey , 1974, The Journal of physiology.