The application of the MCDM paradigm to the management of agricultural systems: Some basic considerations

Abstract Since the early seventies some path-breaking research, mainly in management science, has extended and developed the frontiers of mathematical programming and other similar approaches to a new paradigm for dealing with multiple-criteria in decision-making. The applications of such techniques and methods have not been particularly common in relation to agricultural systems, even though some significant theoretical and methodological contributions have emerged from the analysis of watershed management and forestry resource-use problems. This paper provides a ‘state-of-the-art’ review of the general nature of the main multiple criteria decision making methods and emphasises the theoretical and practical aspects of their use rather than the specific technicalities of individual techniques. The main purpose of this exercise is to encourage the use of multiple criteria decision making methodologies in the analysis of agricultural systems.

[1]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[2]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Optimal Estimation of Executive Compensation by Linear Programming , 1955 .

[3]  Abu S.M. Masud,et al.  Interactive Sequential Goal Programming , 1981 .

[4]  Carlos Romero,et al.  GOAL PROGRAMMING AND MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING IN FARM PLANNING: AN EXPOSITORY ANALYSIS-A REPLY , 1984 .

[5]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Man. , 1957 .

[6]  Mark Gershon,et al.  Multiobjective Approaches to River Basin Planning , 1981 .

[7]  H. Herath An empirical evaluation of multiattribute utility theory in peasant agriculture , 1981 .

[8]  Ralph E. Steuer Multiple Objective Linear Programming with Interval Criterion Weights , 1976 .

[9]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[10]  Jeffrey L. Arthur,et al.  PAGP, A Partitioning Algorithm for (Linear) Goal Programming Problems , 1980, TOMS.

[11]  K. Arrow,et al.  Social Choice and Multicriterion Decision-Making , 1986 .

[12]  P. Yu A Class of Solutions for Group Decision Problems , 1973 .

[13]  Milan Zeleny,et al.  The pros and cons of goal programming , 1981, Comput. Oper. Res..

[14]  Ralph E. Steuer,et al.  Intra-set point generation and filtering in decision and criterion space , 1980, Comput. Oper. Res..

[15]  Simon French,et al.  Multi-Objective Decision Analysis with Engineering and Business Applications , 1983 .

[16]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  Goal programming for decision analysis , 1972 .

[17]  Carlos Romero,et al.  Natural resource management and the use of multiple criteria decision-making techniques: A review , 1987 .

[18]  Guillermo A. Mendoza,et al.  Goal Programming: Potential and Limitations for Agricultural Economics , 1987 .

[19]  J. Brian Hardaker,et al.  An Experiment In Multiattribute Utility Theory , 1985 .

[20]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[21]  Edward L. Hannan,et al.  Nondominance In Goal Programming , 1980 .

[22]  Roger M. Y. Ho,et al.  Goal programming and extensions , 1976 .

[23]  J. Arthur,et al.  Note—An Efficient Goal Programming Algorithm Using Constraint Partitioning and Variable Elimination , 1978 .

[24]  James P. Ignizio,et al.  Sequential linear goal programming: Implementation via MPSX , 1979, Comput. Oper. Res..

[25]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS: THE PROMETHEE METHOD , 1986 .