An application of a rank ordered probit modeling approach to understanding level of interest in autonomous vehicles

Surveys of behavior could benefit from information about people’s relative ranking of choice alternatives. Rank ordered data are often collected in stated preference surveys where respondents are asked to rank hypothetical alternatives (rather than choose a single alternative) to better understand their relative preferences. Despite the widespread interest in collecting data on and modeling people’s preferences for choice alternatives, rank-ordered data are rarely collected in travel surveys and very little progress has been made in the ability to rigorously model such data and obtain reliable parameter estimates. This paper presents a rank ordered probit modeling approach that overcomes limitations associated with prior approaches in analyzing rank ordered data. The efficacy of the rank ordered probit modeling methodology is demonstrated through an application of the model to understand preferences for alternative configurations of autonomous vehicles (AV) using the 2015 Puget Sound Regional Travel Study survey data set. The methodology offers behaviorally intuitive model results with a variety of socio-economic and demographic characteristics, including age, gender, household income, education, employment and household structure, significantly influencing preference for alternative configurations of AV adoption, ownership, and shared usage. The ability to estimate rank ordered probit models offers a pathway for better utilizing rank ordered data to understand preferences and recognize that choices may not be absolute in many instances.

[1]  Barry C. Field Explorations in Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, Essays in Honor of Gardner M. Brown, Jr. , 2011 .

[2]  Catherine L. Kling,et al.  Environmental Valuation under Dynamic Consumer Behavior , 2006 .

[3]  Jerry A. Hausman and Paul A. Ruud.,et al.  Specifying and Testing Econometric Models for Rank-ordered Data with an Application to the Demand for Mobile and Portable Telephones , 1986 .

[4]  Hong Il Yoo,et al.  The seeming unreliability of rank-ordered data as a consequence of model misspecification , 2014 .

[5]  Paul D. Allison,et al.  Logit Models for Sets of Ranked Items , 1994 .

[6]  Mayer Alvo,et al.  Probit Models for Ranking Data , 2014 .

[7]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Exploring scale effects of best/worst rank ordered choice data to estimate visitors' benefits from alpine transhumance , 2009 .

[8]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  The maximum approximate composite marginal likelihood (MACML) estimation of multinomial probit-based unordered response choice models , 2011 .

[9]  Pravin K. Trivedi,et al.  Bayesian analysis of the ordered probit model with endogenous selection , 2008 .

[10]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Assessing the potential demand for electric cars , 1981 .

[11]  Alejandro Caparrós,et al.  Would You Choose Your Preferred Option? Comparing Choice and Recoded Ranking Experiments , 2007 .

[12]  Susana Mourato,et al.  Testing for Consistency in Contingent Ranking Experiments , 2002 .

[13]  Paul A. Ruud,et al.  Handbook of Econometrics: Classical Estimation Methods for LDV Models Using Simulation , 1993 .

[14]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis , 1979 .

[15]  Dennis Fok,et al.  A rank-ordered logit model with unobserved heterogeneity in ranking capabilities. , 2007 .

[16]  R. Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. , 1960 .

[17]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Exploring Scale Effects of Best/Worst Rank Ordered Choice Data to Estimate Benefits of Tourism in Alpine Grazing Commons , 2011 .

[18]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  New matrix-based methods for the analytic evaluation of the multivariate cumulative normal distribution function , 2018 .

[19]  Michael Keane,et al.  A Note on Identification in the Multinomial Probit Model , 1992 .