Microfluidic platform for the study of intercellular communication via soluble factor-cell and cell-cell paracrine signaling.

Diffusion of autocrine and paracrine signaling molecules allows cells to communicate in the absence of physical contact. This chemical-based, long-range communication serves crucial roles in tissue function, activation of the immune system, and other physiological functions. Despite its importance, few in vitro methods to study cell-cell signaling through paracrine factors are available today. Here, we report the design and validation of a microfluidic platform that enables (i) soluble molecule-cell and/or (ii) cell-cell paracrine signaling. In the microfluidic platform, multiple cell populations can be introduced into parallel channels. The channels are separated by arrays of posts allowing diffusion of paracrine molecules between cell populations. A computational analysis was performed to aid design of the microfluidic platform. Specifically, it revealed that channel spacing affects both spatial and temporal distribution of signaling molecules, while the initial concentration of the signaling molecule mainly affects the concentration of the signaling molecules excreted by the cells. To validate the microfluidic platform, a model system composed of the signaling molecule lipopolysaccharide, mouse macrophages, and engineered human embryonic kidney cells was introduced into the platform. Upon diffusion from the first channel to the second channel, lipopolysaccharide activates the macrophages which begin to produce TNF-α. The TNF-α diffuses from the second channel to the third channel to stimulate the kidney cells, which express green fluorescent protein (GFP) in response. By increasing the initial lipopolysaccharide concentration an increase in fluorescent response was recorded, demonstrating the ability to quantify intercellular communication between 3D cellular constructs using the microfluidic platform reported here. Overall, these studies provide a detailed analysis on how concentration of the initial signaling molecules, spatiotemporal dynamics, and inter-channel spacing affect intercellular communication.

[1]  D. Beebe,et al.  Fundamentals of microfluidic cell culture in controlled microenvironments. , 2010, Chemical Society reviews.

[2]  Michela Matteoli,et al.  Overflow microfluidic networks for open and closed cell cultures on chip. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[3]  A. Abbott Cell culture: Biology's new dimension , 2003, Nature.

[4]  F M Watt,et al.  Out of Eden: stem cells and their niches. , 2000, Science.

[5]  R. Davis,et al.  PSGL-1/selectin and ICAM-1/CD18 interactions are involved in macrophage-induced drug resistance in myeloma , 2013, Leukemia.

[6]  P. Scheurich,et al.  Tumor necrosis factor signaling , 2003, Cell Death and Differentiation.

[7]  Shuichi Takayama,et al.  Microfluidic hydrodynamic cellular patterning for systematic formation of co-culture spheroids. , 2009, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[8]  T. Hagemann,et al.  The tumor microenvironment at a glance , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[9]  B. Haribabu,et al.  Lipid-cytokine-chemokine cascade drives neutrophil recruitment in a murine model of inflammatory arthritis. , 2010, Immunity.

[10]  A. Lee,et al.  Engineering microscale cellular niches for three-dimensional multicellular co-cultures. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[11]  Eugenia Ciocan,et al.  Optimized numerical pharmacokinetics model for optical molecular probes based on diffusion coefficients in matrigel measured using fluorescence imaging , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[12]  G M Whitesides,et al.  Patterning cells and their environments using multiple laminar fluid flows in capillary networks. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Steven C George,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cells enhance angiogenesis in mechanically viable prevascularized tissues via early matrix metalloproteinase upregulation. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[14]  D. Beebe,et al.  Three-dimensional micro-channel fabrication in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) elastomer , 2000, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[15]  L. Griffith,et al.  Capturing complex 3D tissue physiology in vitro , 2006, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[16]  David J Beebe,et al.  Hormonally responsive breast cancer cells in a microfluidic co-culture model as a sensor of microenvironmental activity. , 2013, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[17]  Photo-Polymer Microchannel Technologies and Applications , 1998 .

[18]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Modeling Tissue Morphogenesis and Cancer in 3D , 2007, Cell.

[19]  A. Östman The tumor microenvironment controls drug sensitivity , 2012, Nature Medicine.

[20]  M. Despont,et al.  SU-8: a low-cost negative resist for MEMS , 1997 .

[21]  E. Sahai,et al.  Fibroblast-led collective invasion of carcinoma cells with differing roles for RhoGTPases in leading and following cells , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[22]  Aaron R Wheeler,et al.  A microfluidic membrane device to mimic critical components of the vascular microenvironment. , 2011, Biomicrofluidics.

[23]  Ali Khademhosseini,et al.  Co-culture of human embryonic stem cells with murine embryonic fibroblasts on microwell-patterned substrates. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[24]  D. Gabrilovich,et al.  Coordinated regulation of myeloid cells by tumours , 2012, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[25]  Sunghoon Kwon,et al.  Capillary based patterning of cellular communities in laterally open channels. , 2010, Analytical chemistry.

[26]  David J Beebe,et al.  3D microchannel co-culture: method and biological validation. , 2010, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[27]  B. Lin,et al.  Characterization of the interaction between fibroblasts and tumor cells on a microfluidic co‐culture device , 2010, Electrophoresis.

[28]  David J Beebe,et al.  Characterization of a membrane-based gradient generator for use in cell-signaling studies. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[29]  H. Schreiber,et al.  Innate and adaptive immune cells in the tumor microenvironment , 2013, Nature Immunology.

[30]  P. Kubes,et al.  Intravascular Danger Signals Guide Neutrophils to Sites of Sterile Inflammation , 2010, Science.

[31]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  Transition to invasion in breast cancer: a microfluidic in vitro model enables examination of spatial and temporal effects. , 2011, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[32]  K. Shakesheff,et al.  Liver tissue engineering: a role for co-culture systems in modifying hepatocyte function and viability. , 2001, Tissue engineering.

[33]  R. Kamm,et al.  Cell migration into scaffolds under co-culture conditions in a microfluidic platform. , 2009, Lab on a chip.

[34]  A. Efremov,et al.  Micropatterned superhydrophobic structures for the simultaneous culture of multiple cell types and the study of cell-cell communication. , 2013, Biomaterials.

[35]  B. Beutler,et al.  Tlr4: central component of the sole mammalian LPS sensor. , 2000, Current opinion in immunology.

[36]  D. Beebe,et al.  Streamlining gene expression analysis: integration of co-culture and mRNA purification. , 2014, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[37]  Raquel Perez-Castillejos,et al.  Partitioning microfluidic channels with hydrogel to construct tunable 3-D cellular microenvironments. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[38]  M. Karin,et al.  Signal transduction by tumor necrosis factor and its relatives. , 2001, Trends in cell biology.

[39]  P. Baeuerle,et al.  Function and activation of NF-kappa B in the immune system. , 1994, Annual review of immunology.

[40]  D. Golenbock,et al.  Endotoxin recognition and signal transduction by the TLR4/MD2-complex. , 2004, Microbes and infection.