Processing anaphoric constructions: Insights from electrophysiological studies

Abstract Anaphora is a common, universal, and critical aspect of communication. For quite some time, linguists and psycholinguists have applied introspective and behavioral techniques to the study of anaphora, yielding a large body of evidence and generating a number of theories and models of anaphoric usage and processing. The recent advent of the use of electrophysiological techniques to study language processing creates a unique opportunity to reevaluate these theories and models on the basis of neurophysiological data. This paper examines whether two key characteristics of anaphoric relationships (i.e. the underlying linguistic mechanism and the nature of the anaphor) have observable effects on neurophysiological processing. An exhaustive review of electrophysiological studies testing anaphoric constructions leads to the novel conclusion that the effects of these characteristics are reducible to differences in the time-course of the availability of information and the ability to form expectations about anaphoric relationships. This review also demonstrates that while theories of anaphoric usage are generally supported, finer-grained models of the time-course of anaphoric processing require revision to account for the new electrophysiological data.

[1]  E Donchin,et al.  Syntactic parsing preferences and their on-line revisions: a spatio-temporal analysis of event-related brain potentials. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  Brain potentials reflect violations of gender stereotypes , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[3]  D Swinney,et al.  The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[4]  L. Frazier,et al.  Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in dutch , 1989 .

[5]  P. Gordon,et al.  Pronominalization and discourse coherence, discourse structure and pronoun interpretation , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[6]  T F Münte,et al.  Brain Potentials in the Processing of Complex Sentences: An ERP Study of Control and Raising Constructions , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[7]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses , 1998, Biological Psychology.

[8]  A D Friederici,et al.  Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[9]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Syntactic processing: Evidence from dutch , 1987 .

[10]  David Swinney,et al.  The Psycholinguistics of Anaphora , 2008 .

[11]  Frank Rösler,et al.  Event-Related Responses to Pronoun and Proper Name Anaphors in Parallel and Nonparallel Discourse Structures , 1999, Brain and Language.

[12]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  ON COMPREHENDING SENTENCES: SYNTACTIC PARSING STRATEGIES. , 1979 .

[13]  C. Clifton,et al.  Comprehending Sentences with Long-Distance Dependencies , 1989 .

[14]  Megan A. Boudewyn,et al.  Processing new and repeated names: Effects of coreference on repetition priming with speech and fast RSVP , 2007, Brain Research.

[15]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Approaches to studying world-situated language use : bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions , 2005 .

[16]  E Donchin,et al.  P300 and the word frequency effect. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  Arild Hestvik,et al.  Brain responses to filled gaps , 2007, Brain and Language.

[18]  C. Felser,et al.  Storage and integration in the processing of filler-gap dependencies: An ERP study of topicalization and wh-movement in German , 2003, Brain and Language.

[19]  C. Phillips,et al.  ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[20]  Mira Ariel The function of accessibility in a theory of grammar , 1991 .

[21]  Natalie A. Phillips,et al.  An electrophysiological study of mood, modal context, and anaphora , 2006, Brain Research.

[22]  Robert Kluender,et al.  Subjacency as a processing phenomenon , 1993 .

[23]  E. Kaan,et al.  Repair, Revision, and Complexity in Syntactic Analysis: An Electrophysiological Differentiation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Alan Garnham,et al.  Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora , 2001 .

[25]  T. Givon Topic Continuity in Discourse , 1983 .

[26]  Edgar Zurif,et al.  THE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY OF LANGUAGE , 1994 .

[27]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[28]  Lee Osterhout,et al.  Constraints on Movement Phenomena in Sentence Processing: Evidence from Event-related Brain Potentials , 1996 .

[29]  Frank Wijnen,et al.  Gapping: Electrophysiological evidence for immediate processing of “missing” verbs in sentence comprehension , 2004, Brain and Language.

[30]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  Natural language parsing: How can grammars help parsers? , 1985 .

[31]  Frank Rösler,et al.  Different Anaphoric Expressions Are Investigated by Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2004, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[32]  Simon Garrod,et al.  The Contribution of Lexical and Situational Knowledge to Resolving Discourse Roles: Bonding and Resolution , 2000 .

[33]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Linguistic Structure in Language Processing , 1988 .

[34]  A. Almor Noun-phrase anaphora and focus : The informational load hypothesis , 1999 .

[35]  M. Kutas,et al.  An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[36]  Maria Nella Carminati,et al.  The processing of Italian subject pronouns , 2002 .

[37]  A. Garnham,et al.  The Locus of Implicit Causality Effects in Comprehension. , 1996, Journal of memory and language.

[38]  Laurie A. Stowe,et al.  Parsing WH-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location , 1986 .

[39]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  Who are You Talking About? Tracking Discourse-level Referential Processing with Event-related Brain Potentials , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  H. M. Müller,et al.  Event-related potentials elicited by spoken relative clauses. , 1997, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[41]  Y. Grodzinsky Theoretical perspectives on language deficits , 1990 .

[42]  M. Kutas,et al.  Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Brain responses to nouns, verbs and class-ambiguous words in context. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[44]  A D Friederici,et al.  Syntactic Working Memory and the Establishment of Filler-Gap Dependencies: Insights from ERPs and fMRI , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[45]  Thomas F Münte,et al.  Neural correlates of semantic and syntactic processes in the comprehension of case marked pronouns: Evidence from German and Dutch , 2006, BMC Neuroscience.

[46]  H. Kolk,et al.  Late positivities in unusual situations , 2007, Brain and Language.

[47]  H. H. Clark,et al.  In search of referents for nouns and pronouns , 1979 .

[48]  M. Kutas,et al.  Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open- and closed-class words , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[49]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[50]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[51]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  The P600 as an indicator of syntactic ambiguity , 2002, Cognition.

[52]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[53]  Henk J Haarmann,et al.  Short-term semantic retention during on-line sentence comprehension. Brain potential evidence from filler-gap constructions. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[54]  M. Garrett,et al.  Syntactically Based Sentence Processing Classes: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[55]  Sascha Tamm,et al.  Event-related theta activity reflects memory processes in pronoun resolution , 2006, Neuroreport.

[56]  E. Gibson,et al.  The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty , 2000 .

[57]  L. Osterhout,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials Elicited by Failure to Agree , 1995 .

[58]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[59]  G. Murphy Psychological explanations of deep and surface anaphora , 1985 .

[60]  P. Gordon,et al.  Coreference and lexical repetition: Mechanisms of discourse integration , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[61]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  Empty categories in sentence processing , 1989 .

[62]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[63]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Pronoun disambiguation: Accessing potential antecedents , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[64]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  THE TIME-COURSE OF PROCESSING SYNTACTIC DEPENDENCIES: EVIDENCE FROM EYE MOVEMENTS DURING SPOKEN NARRATIVES , 2001 .

[65]  Steven P. Abney,et al.  Parsing arguments: Phrase structure and argument structure as determinants of initial parsing decisions. , 1991 .

[66]  P. Gordon,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for Reversed Lexical Repetition Effects in Language Processing , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[67]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Toward a theory of anaphoric processing , 1984 .

[68]  J. Grafman,et al.  Distinctions and similarities among working memory processes: an event-related potential study. , 1992, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[69]  John Robert Ross,et al.  Constraints on variables in syntax , 1967 .

[70]  A. Friederici Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[71]  Liliane Haegeman,et al.  Introduction to Government and Binding Theory , 1991 .

[72]  Robert Kluender,et al.  Event-related brain indices of Japanese scrambling , 2003, Brain and Language.

[73]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  Establishing reference in language comprehension: An electrophysiological perspective , 2007, Brain Research.

[74]  Petra Burkhardt,et al.  Inferential bridging relations reveal distinct neural mechanisms: Evidence from event-related brain potentials , 2006, Brain and Language.

[75]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The neurocognition of syntactic processing , 1999 .

[76]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Evoked potentials and the study of sentence comprehension , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[77]  M. Kutas,et al.  Bridging the Gap: Evidence from ERPs on the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[78]  Randall Hendrick,et al.  The Representation and Processing of Coreference in Discourse , 1998, Cogn. Sci..

[79]  Susan M. Garnsey Event-related brain potentials in the study of language: An introduction , 1993 .

[80]  José E. García-Albea,et al.  Identifying the Null Subject: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1999, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[81]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution: Evidence from ERPs , 2006, Brain Research.

[82]  Scott Weinstein,et al.  Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse , 1995, CL.

[83]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[84]  M. Kutas,et al.  Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations , 1998 .

[85]  Sascha Tamm,et al.  Does the frequency of the antecedent noun affect the resolution of pronominal anaphors?: An ERP study , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[86]  M. Rugg Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high-and low-frequency words , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[87]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Handbook Of Psychophysiology , 2019 .

[88]  Tony Harris,et al.  An ERP Investigation of Binding and Coreference , 2000, Brain and Language.

[89]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials , 1999 .

[90]  Thomas F Münte,et al.  Electrophysiological estimates of biological and syntactic gender violation during pronoun processing. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[91]  P Hagoort,et al.  Discourse Before Gender: An Event-Related Brain Potential Study on the Interplay of Semantic and Syntactic Information During Spoken Language Understanding , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[92]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .

[93]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  An electrophysiological investigation of the effects of coreference on word repetition and synonymy , 2005, Brain and Language.

[94]  Alessandro Angrilli,et al.  Processing of temporary syntactic ambiguity in Italian “who”-questions: a study with event-related potentials , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[95]  Bernadette M. Jansma,et al.  Pronominal Reference in Sentences about Persons or Things: An Electrophysiological Approach , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.