Processing anaphoric constructions: Insights from electrophysiological studies
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] E Donchin,et al. Syntactic parsing preferences and their on-line revisions: a spatio-temporal analysis of event-related brain potentials. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[2] Lee Osterhout,et al. Brain potentials reflect violations of gender stereotypes , 1997, Memory & cognition.
[3] D Swinney,et al. The role of structure in coreference assignment during sentence comprehension , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[4] L. Frazier,et al. Filler driven parsing: A study of gap filling in dutch , 1989 .
[5] P. Gordon,et al. Pronominalization and discourse coherence, discourse structure and pronoun interpretation , 1995, Memory & cognition.
[6] T F Münte,et al. Brain Potentials in the Processing of Complex Sentences: An ERP Study of Control and Raising Constructions , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[7] Martin Meyer,et al. Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses , 1998, Biological Psychology.
[8] A D Friederici,et al. Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials , 1995, Memory & cognition.
[9] Lyn Frazier,et al. Syntactic processing: Evidence from dutch , 1987 .
[10] David Swinney,et al. The Psycholinguistics of Anaphora , 2008 .
[11] Frank Rösler,et al. Event-Related Responses to Pronoun and Proper Name Anaphors in Parallel and Nonparallel Discourse Structures , 1999, Brain and Language.
[12] Lyn Frazier,et al. ON COMPREHENDING SENTENCES: SYNTACTIC PARSING STRATEGIES. , 1979 .
[13] C. Clifton,et al. Comprehending Sentences with Long-Distance Dependencies , 1989 .
[14] Megan A. Boudewyn,et al. Processing new and repeated names: Effects of coreference on repetition priming with speech and fast RSVP , 2007, Brain Research.
[15] M. Tanenhaus,et al. Approaches to studying world-situated language use : bridging the language-as-product and language-as-action traditions , 2005 .
[16] E Donchin,et al. P300 and the word frequency effect. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[17] Arild Hestvik,et al. Brain responses to filled gaps , 2007, Brain and Language.
[18] C. Felser,et al. Storage and integration in the processing of filler-gap dependencies: An ERP study of topicalization and wh-movement in German , 2003, Brain and Language.
[19] C. Phillips,et al. ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[20] Mira Ariel. The function of accessibility in a theory of grammar , 1991 .
[21] Natalie A. Phillips,et al. An electrophysiological study of mood, modal context, and anaphora , 2006, Brain Research.
[22] Robert Kluender,et al. Subjacency as a processing phenomenon , 1993 .
[23] E. Kaan,et al. Repair, Revision, and Complexity in Syntactic Analysis: An Electrophysiological Differentiation , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[24] Alan Garnham,et al. Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora , 2001 .
[25] T. Givon. Topic Continuity in Discourse , 1983 .
[26] Edgar Zurif,et al. THE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY OF LANGUAGE , 1994 .
[27] Noam Chomsky,et al. The Minimalist Program , 1992 .
[28] Lee Osterhout,et al. Constraints on Movement Phenomena in Sentence Processing: Evidence from Event-related Brain Potentials , 1996 .
[29] Frank Wijnen,et al. Gapping: Electrophysiological evidence for immediate processing of “missing” verbs in sentence comprehension , 2004, Brain and Language.
[30] Janet Dean Fodor,et al. Natural language parsing: How can grammars help parsers? , 1985 .
[31] Frank Rösler,et al. Different Anaphoric Expressions Are Investigated by Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2004, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[32] Simon Garrod,et al. The Contribution of Lexical and Situational Knowledge to Resolving Discourse Roles: Bonding and Resolution , 2000 .
[33] Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al. Linguistic Structure in Language Processing , 1988 .
[34] A. Almor. Noun-phrase anaphora and focus : The informational load hypothesis , 1999 .
[35] M. Kutas,et al. An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of object relative sentences. , 1999, Psychophysiology.
[36] Maria Nella Carminati,et al. The processing of Italian subject pronouns , 2002 .
[37] A. Garnham,et al. The Locus of Implicit Causality Effects in Comprehension. , 1996, Journal of memory and language.
[38] Laurie A. Stowe,et al. Parsing WH-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location , 1986 .
[39] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. Who are You Talking About? Tracking Discourse-level Referential Processing with Event-related Brain Potentials , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[40] H. M. Müller,et al. Event-related potentials elicited by spoken relative clauses. , 1997, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[41] Y. Grodzinsky. Theoretical perspectives on language deficits , 1990 .
[42] M. Kutas,et al. Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[43] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Brain responses to nouns, verbs and class-ambiguous words in context. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[44] A D Friederici,et al. Syntactic Working Memory and the Establishment of Filler-Gap Dependencies: Insights from ERPs and fMRI , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[45] Thomas F Münte,et al. Neural correlates of semantic and syntactic processes in the comprehension of case marked pronouns: Evidence from German and Dutch , 2006, BMC Neuroscience.
[46] H. Kolk,et al. Late positivities in unusual situations , 2007, Brain and Language.
[47] H. H. Clark,et al. In search of referents for nouns and pronouns , 1979 .
[48] M. Kutas,et al. Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open- and closed-class words , 1991, Memory & cognition.
[49] Lyn Frazier,et al. Sentence processing: A tutorial review. , 1987 .
[50] Peter Hagoort,et al. Event-related brain potentials reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension. , 2003, Psychophysiology.
[51] Matthias Schlesewsky,et al. The P600 as an indicator of syntactic ambiguity , 2002, Cognition.
[52] Barbara J. Grosz,et al. Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse , 1993, Cogn. Sci..
[53] Henk J Haarmann,et al. Short-term semantic retention during on-line sentence comprehension. Brain potential evidence from filler-gap constructions. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[54] M. Garrett,et al. Syntactically Based Sentence Processing Classes: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[55] Sascha Tamm,et al. Event-related theta activity reflects memory processes in pronoun resolution , 2006, Neuroreport.
[56] E. Gibson,et al. The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty , 2000 .
[57] L. Osterhout,et al. Event-Related Brain Potentials Elicited by Failure to Agree , 1995 .
[58] Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .
[59] G. Murphy. Psychological explanations of deep and surface anaphora , 1985 .
[60] P. Gordon,et al. Coreference and lexical repetition: Mechanisms of discourse integration , 2007, Memory & cognition.
[61] Janet Dean Fodor,et al. Empty categories in sentence processing , 1989 .
[62] Noam Chomsky,et al. Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .
[63] Albert T. Corbett,et al. Pronoun disambiguation: Accessing potential antecedents , 1983, Memory & cognition.
[64] Julie C. Sedivy,et al. THE TIME-COURSE OF PROCESSING SYNTACTIC DEPENDENCIES: EVIDENCE FROM EYE MOVEMENTS DURING SPOKEN NARRATIVES , 2001 .
[65] Steven P. Abney,et al. Parsing arguments: Phrase structure and argument structure as determinants of initial parsing decisions. , 1991 .
[66] P. Gordon,et al. Electrophysiological Evidence for Reversed Lexical Repetition Effects in Language Processing , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[67] Ivan A. Sag,et al. Toward a theory of anaphoric processing , 1984 .
[68] J. Grafman,et al. Distinctions and similarities among working memory processes: an event-related potential study. , 1992, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[69] John Robert Ross,et al. Constraints on variables in syntax , 1967 .
[70] A. Friederici. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[71] Liliane Haegeman,et al. Introduction to Government and Binding Theory , 1991 .
[72] Robert Kluender,et al. Event-related brain indices of Japanese scrambling , 2003, Brain and Language.
[73] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. Establishing reference in language comprehension: An electrophysiological perspective , 2007, Brain Research.
[74] Petra Burkhardt,et al. Inferential bridging relations reveal distinct neural mechanisms: Evidence from event-related brain potentials , 2006, Brain and Language.
[75] Peter Hagoort,et al. The neurocognition of syntactic processing , 1999 .
[76] Susan M. Garnsey,et al. Evoked potentials and the study of sentence comprehension , 1989, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[77] M. Kutas,et al. Bridging the Gap: Evidence from ERPs on the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[78] Randall Hendrick,et al. The Representation and Processing of Coreference in Discourse , 1998, Cogn. Sci..
[79] Susan M. Garnsey. Event-related brain potentials in the study of language: An introduction , 1993 .
[80] José E. García-Albea,et al. Identifying the Null Subject: Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials , 1999, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[81] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution: Evidence from ERPs , 2006, Brain Research.
[82] Scott Weinstein,et al. Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse , 1995, CL.
[83] M. Just,et al. From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .
[84] M. Kutas,et al. Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations , 1998 .
[85] Sascha Tamm,et al. Does the frequency of the antecedent noun affect the resolution of pronominal anaphors?: An ERP study , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.
[86] M. Rugg. Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high-and low-frequency words , 1990, Memory & cognition.
[87] J. Cacioppo,et al. Handbook Of Psychophysiology , 2019 .
[88] Tony Harris,et al. An ERP Investigation of Binding and Coreference , 2000, Brain and Language.
[89] Colin M. Brown,et al. Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials , 1999 .
[90] Thomas F Münte,et al. Electrophysiological estimates of biological and syntactic gender violation during pronoun processing. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[91] P Hagoort,et al. Discourse Before Gender: An Event-Related Brain Potential Study on the Interplay of Semantic and Syntactic Information During Spoken Language Understanding , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.
[92] Colin M. Brown,et al. The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .
[93] Phillip J. Holcomb,et al. An electrophysiological investigation of the effects of coreference on word repetition and synonymy , 2005, Brain and Language.
[94] Alessandro Angrilli,et al. Processing of temporary syntactic ambiguity in Italian “who”-questions: a study with event-related potentials , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.
[95] Bernadette M. Jansma,et al. Pronominal Reference in Sentences about Persons or Things: An Electrophysiological Approach , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.