Switch-Independent Task Representations in Frontal and Parietal Cortex

Alternating between two tasks is effortful and impairs performance. Previous fMRI studies have found increased activity in frontoparietal cortex when task switching is required. One possibility is that the additional control demands for switch trials are met by strengthening task representations in the human brain. Alternatively, on switch trials, the residual representation of the previous task might impede the buildup of a neural task representation. This would predict weaker task representations on switch trials, thus also explaining the performance costs. To test this, male and female participants were cued to perform one of two similar tasks, with the task being repeated or switched between successive trials. Multivoxel pattern analysis was used to test which regions encode the tasks and whether this encoding differs between switch and repeat trials. As expected, we found information about task representations in frontal and parietal cortex, but there was no difference in the decoding accuracy of task-related information between switch and repeat trials. Using cross-classification, we found that the frontoparietal cortex encodes tasks using a generalizable spatial pattern in switch and repeat trials. Therefore, task representations in frontal and parietal cortex are largely switch independent. We found no evidence that neural information about task representations in these regions can explain behavioral costs usually associated with task switching. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Alternating between two tasks is effortful and slows down performance. One possible explanation is that the representations in the human brain need time to build up and are thus weaker on switch trials, explaining performance costs. Alternatively, task representations might even be enhanced to overcome the previous task. Here, we used a combination of fMRI and a brain classifier to test whether the additional control demands under switching conditions lead to an increased or decreased strength of task representations in frontoparietal brain regions. We found that task representations are not modulated significantly by switching processes and generalize across switching conditions. Therefore, task representations in the human brain cannot account for the performance costs associated with alternating between tasks.

[1]  S. Gilbert Decoding the Content of Delayed Intentions , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Taosheng Liu,et al.  A Hierarchy of Attentional Priority Signals in Human Frontoparietal Cortex , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Kenneth F. Valyear,et al.  Dissociating Arbitrary Stimulus-Response Mapping from Movement Planning during Preparatory Period: Evidence from Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Polina Golland,et al.  Coping with confounds in multivoxel pattern analysis: What should we do about reaction time differences? A comment on Todd, Nystrom & Cohen 2013 , 2014, NeuroImage.

[5]  David Badre,et al.  Cognitive control, hierarchy, and the rostro–caudal organization of the frontal lobes , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  D. Meyer,et al.  Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  J. Duncan An adaptive coding model of neural function in prefrontal cortex , 2001 .

[8]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  The neural basis of task switching changes with skill acquisition , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[9]  Stefan Bode,et al.  Decoding sequential stages of task preparation in the human brain , 2009, NeuroImage.

[10]  Michael L. Waskom,et al.  Frontoparietal Representations of Task Context Support the Flexible Control of Goal-Directed Cognition , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Benjamin J. Tamber-Rosenau,et al.  Avoiding non-independence in fMRI data analysis: Leave one subject out , 2010, NeuroImage.

[12]  A. Vandierendonck,et al.  Task switching: interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  S. Keele,et al.  Changing internal constraints on action: the role of backward inhibition. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  Sean M. Polyn,et al.  Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  A. Jersild Mental set and shift , 2011 .

[16]  E. M. Altmann,et al.  Task switching is not cue switching , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  Aaron Kucyi,et al.  Stable Task Representations under Attentional Load Revealed with Multivariate Pattern Analysis of Human Brain Activity , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[18]  J. Duncan The Structure of Cognition: Attentional Episodes in Mind and Brain , 2013, Neuron.

[19]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  Anina N. Rich,et al.  Flexible Coding of Task Rules in Frontoparietal Cortex: An Adaptive System for Flexible Cognitive Control , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  J. Duncan,et al.  Adaptive Coding of Task-Relevant Information in Human Frontoparietal Cortex , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  David E. Meyer,et al.  Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. , 2001 .

[23]  Martin N. Hebart,et al.  The Decoding Toolbox (TDT): a versatile software package for multivariate analyses of functional imaging data , 2015, Front. Neuroinform..

[24]  A. Dove,et al.  Prefrontal cortex activation in task switching: an event-related fMRI study. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[25]  Jan De Houwer,et al.  Potentiation of the startle reflex is in line with contingency reversal instructions rather than the conditioning history , 2016, Biological Psychology.

[26]  John-Dylan Haynes,et al.  Distributed Representations of Rule Identity and Rule Order in Human Frontal Cortex and Striatum , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  I. Biederman,et al.  Mental set and mental shift revisited , 1976 .

[28]  E. Crone,et al.  Neural evidence for dissociable components of task-switching. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  J. Haynes Brain Reading: Decoding Mental States From Brain Activity In Humans , 2011 .

[30]  John-Dylan Haynes,et al.  The Neural Representation of Voluntary Task-Set Selection in Dynamic Environments. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  F. Karayanidis,et al.  The many faces of preparatory control in task switching: Reviewing a decade of fMRI research , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[32]  W. K. Simmons,et al.  Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[33]  Zoltan Dienes,et al.  Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[34]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of functional MRI time‐series , 1994, Human Brain Mapping.

[35]  S. Monsell,et al.  Costs of a predictible switch between simple cognitive tasks. , 1995 .

[36]  E. Wagenmakers A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[37]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Between-Task Competition and Cognitive Control in Task Switching , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  T. Goschke Intentional reconfiguration and involuntary persistence in task-set switching , 2000 .

[39]  Andrea M Philipp,et al.  Control and interference in task switching--a review. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  H. Jeffreys A Treatise on Probability , 1922, Nature.

[41]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  Task Switching: Mechanisms Underlying Rigid vs. Flexible Self-control , 2009 .

[42]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Pattern-information analysis: From stimulus decoding to computational-model testing , 2011, NeuroImage.

[43]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The role of prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex in task switching. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  G. D. Logan Task Switching , 2022 .

[45]  R. Passingham,et al.  Prefrontal interactions reflect future task operations , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  Carter Wendelken,et al.  Flexible rule use: Common neural substrates in children and adults , 2012, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  E. Miller,et al.  Neural circuits subserving the retrieval and maintenance of abstract rules. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  M. Brass,et al.  The role of the inferior frontal junction area in cognitive control , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[49]  John-Dylan Haynes,et al.  Compositionality of rule representations in human prefrontal cortex. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[50]  Carolin Dudschig,et al.  Speeding before and slowing after errors: Is it all just strategy? , 2009, Brain Research.

[51]  I. Momennejad,et al.  Encoding of Prospective Tasks in the Human Prefrontal Cortex under Varying Task Loads , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  M. Hughes,et al.  The spatial and temporal dynamics of anticipatory preparation and response inhibition in task-switching , 2010, NeuroImage.

[53]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  The control of attention and actions: Current research and future developments , 2006, Brain Research.

[54]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Confounds in multivariate pattern analysis: Theory and rule representation case study , 2013, NeuroImage.

[55]  Jeremy R. Reynolds,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Transient and Sustained Cognitive Control during Task Switching , 2003, Neuron.

[56]  J. Duncan The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain: mental programs for intelligent behaviour , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[57]  R. Kliegl,et al.  Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[58]  I. Momennejad,et al.  The Role of the Parietal Cortex in the Representation of Task–Reward Associations , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[59]  Johan D. Carlin,et al.  Choosing the Rules: Distinct and Overlapping Frontoparietal Representations of Task Rules for Perceptual Decisions , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[60]  Peter Falkai,et al.  Neural mechanisms of advance preparation in task switching , 2006, NeuroImage.

[61]  J. Haynes A Primer on Pattern-Based Approaches to fMRI: Principles, Pitfalls, and Perspectives , 2015, Neuron.

[62]  E. M. Altmann,et al.  Cue-independent task-specific representations in task switching: evidence from backward inhibition. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[63]  K. Arbuthnott,et al.  Asymmetric switch cost and backward inhibition: Carryover activation and inhibition in switching between tasks of unequal difficulty. , 2008, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[64]  D. Alan Allport,et al.  SHIFTING INTENTIONAL SET - EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC CONTROL OF TASKS , 1994 .

[65]  John Duncan,et al.  Multi-voxel coding of stimuli, rules, and responses in human frontoparietal cortex , 2011, NeuroImage.

[66]  John-Dylan Haynes,et al.  Similar coding of freely chosen and externally cued intentions in a fronto-parietal network , 2016, NeuroImage.

[67]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Information-based functional brain mapping. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[68]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Rapid Transfer of Abstract Rules to Novel Contexts in Human Lateral Prefrontal Cortex , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[69]  Hans Knutsson,et al.  Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[70]  Daniel S. Margulies,et al.  NeuroVault.org: A repository for sharing unthresholded statistical maps, parcellations, and atlases of the human brain , 2016, NeuroImage.

[71]  Michael W. Cole,et al.  Reward Motivation Enhances Task Coding in Frontoparietal Cortex. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[72]  Kingson Man,et al.  Multivariate cross-classification: applying machine learning techniques to characterize abstraction in neural representations , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..