Modeling aspects of a floating wind turbine for coupled wave–wind-induced dynamic analyses

This paper deals with the numerical modeling of a catenary moored spar-type wind turbine in the integrated coupled analyses. The current spar-type wind turbine is inspired by the Hywind concept. In this paper, different hydrodynamic models based on the Morison formula, Pressure integration method and Panel method considering the mean drift, first and second order forces are studied. A floating wind turbine in deep water depth supporting a 5-MW turbine system is considered. Simo-Riflex (DeepC), HAWC2 and FAST codes are used to carry out the coupled wave–wind-induced analyses. The results show that the damping and inertia forces of the mooring lines are important for the tension responses; especially, the damping of the mooring lines can help to damp-out the high-frequency elastic-deformations of the mooring system. However, the motion responses are not significantly affected by the mooring line damping-effects. The drift and second order forces do not significantly affect the motion and tension responses. However, the heave motion is more affected by the drift and second order forces. The results indicate that either the Morison formula considering the instantaneous position of the structure or first order hydrodynamic forces based on the Panel method and considering the quadratic viscous forces can provide accurate results for the slender spar-type wind turbines. Considering the second order forces is found to be 10–15 times more time consuming while the responses are not significantly affected for the present floating wind turbine. The coupled aero-hydro-servo-elastic code-to-code comparison of HAWC2 and FAST codes shows that the dynamic motion responses, structural responses at the tower–spar interface and at the blade root as well as the power production are in good agreement.

[1]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Hydroelastic code-to-code comparison for a tension leg spar-type floating wind turbine , 2011 .

[2]  Jason Jonkman,et al.  FAST User's Guide , 2005 .

[3]  Jason Jonkman,et al.  Dynamics of offshore floating wind turbines—model development and verification , 2009 .

[4]  Odd M. Faltinsen,et al.  Sea loads on ships and offshore structures , 1990 .

[5]  Maurizio Collu,et al.  Offshore floating vertical axis wind turbines, dynamics modelling state of the art. part I: Aerodynamics , 2014 .

[6]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Extreme Dynamic Structural Response Analysis of Catenary Moored Spar Wind Turbine in Harsh Environmental Conditions , 2011 .

[7]  Poul Ejnar Sørensen,et al.  Control design for a pitch-regulated, variable speed wind turbine , 2005 .

[8]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Effect of Aerodynamic and Hydrodynamic Damping on Dynamic Response of Spar Type Floating Wind Turbine , 2010 .

[9]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration within IEA Wind Task 23:Phase IV Results Regarding Floating Wind Turbine Modeling: 2010 European Wind Energy Conference (EWEC) 20-23 April 2010, Warsaw, Poland, April 2010 , 2010 .

[10]  J. N. Newman Second-harmonic wave diffraction at large depths , 1990, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[11]  Madjid Karimirad Stochastic Dynamic Response Analysis of Spar-Type Wind Turbines with Catenary or Taut Mooring Systems , 2011 .

[12]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Wave- and Wind-Induced Dynamic Response of a Spar-Type Offshore Wind Turbine , 2012 .

[13]  Anders Melchior Hansen,et al.  Dynamic mooring line modeling in hydro-aero-elastic wind turbine simulations , 2011 .

[14]  J. N. Newman The second-order wave force on a vertical cylinder , 1996, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Ameliorating the Negative Damping in the Dynamic Responses of a Tension Leg Spar-Type Support Structure with a Downwind Turbine , 2011 .