Succession: An Evolutionary Interpretation

An evolutionary interpretation of succession includes the following points. First, in order for a population to be well adapted to a particular set of conditions, it cannot be adapted to many different sets. There is an apparent limit to the width of niche and of habitat that a population can exploit effectively. Selection preserves these unique adaptations and fosters population coupling with the environment. Second, succession provides a complex gradient of physical and biotic environments, analogous to spatial gradients, to which species respond in both ecological and evolutionary time. Selection adjusts the positions of populations on successional gradients in the same way they are adjusted on spatial gradients. Third, the evolutionary strategy, which involves life-cycle length, time of reproduction, reproductive output, and ultimately the degree of recombination, is a basic determinant of species position on both spatial and successional gradients. Fourth, patches of different successional environments are continually changing size, position, and geographic relationship, depending on the disturbance regime. This presents a complex, dynamic pattern of selection pressures in the landscape that allows for the assortment of species into different successional positions. Successional gradients and the evolutionary and functional responses of populations on them are part of a dynamic, regional process rather than a single site pattern.

[1]  R. C. Flemal The Attack On The Davisian System Of Geomorphology: A Synopsis , 1971 .

[2]  J. Harper,et al.  THE COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY OF CLOSELY RELATED SPECIES LIVING IN THE SAME AREA. VII. INTERFERENCE BETWEEN INDIVIDUALS IN PURE AND MIXED POPULATIONS OF PAPAVER SPECIES , 1962 .

[3]  H. G. Baker,et al.  Colonizing species of the native California flora. , 1965 .

[4]  E. W. Beals Vegetational change along altitudinal gradients. , 1969, Science.

[5]  H. S. Horn The adaptive geometry of trees , 1971 .

[6]  Henry J. Oosting,et al.  An Ecological Analysis of the Plant Communities of Piedmont, North Carolina , 1942 .

[7]  Catherine Keever,et al.  Causes of Succession on Old Fields of the Piedmont, North Carolina , 1950 .

[8]  J. T. Curtis,et al.  An Upland Forest Continuum in the Prairie‐Forest Border Region of Wisconsin , 1951 .

[9]  William A. Niering,et al.  Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains , 1963 .

[10]  R. Whittaker Communities and Ecosystems , 1975 .

[11]  J. T. Hack Interpretation of erosional topography in humid temperate regions. , 1960 .

[12]  C. Racine Reproduction of Three Species of Oak in Relation to Vegetational and Environmental Gradients in the Southern Blue Ridge , 1971 .

[13]  Eric R. Pianka,et al.  On r- and K-Selection , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[14]  Julian Adams,et al.  Population Studies in Predominantly Self-Pollinating Species. XIII. Intergenotypic Competition and Population Structure in Barley and Wheat , 1969, The American Naturalist.

[15]  H. G. Baker,et al.  Differentiation of populations. , 1970, Science.

[16]  G. Woodwell,et al.  Effects of Chronic Gamma Irradiation on Plant Communities , 1968, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[17]  J. Antonovics,et al.  Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations , 1978, Heredity.

[18]  S. Pickett,et al.  The Role of Temperature and Light in the Germination Behavior of Ambrosia artemisiifolia , 1973 .

[19]  A. Bradshaw,et al.  Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations VIII. Clinal patterns at a mine boundary , 1970, Heredity.

[20]  R. P. McIntosh Community, Competition, and Adaptation , 1970, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[21]  R. Allard,et al.  Population studies in predominantly self-pollinated species , 1964, Heredity.

[22]  R H Whittaker,et al.  Evolution of diversity in plant communities. , 1969, Brookhaven symposia in biology.

[23]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  Succession on Abandoned Fields in the Shawnee Hills, Southern Illinois , 1968 .

[24]  J. P. Decker,et al.  RELATION BETWEEN LIGHT INTENSITY AND RATE OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS OF LOBLOLLY PINE AND CERTAIN HARDWOODS. , 1944, Plant physiology.

[25]  O. Loucks,et al.  Evolution of diversity, efficiency, and community stability. , 1970, American zoologist.

[26]  G. Ledyard Stebbins,et al.  Variation and Evolution in Plants , 1951 .

[27]  A. R. Kruckeberg THE IMPLICATIONS OF ECOLOGY FOR PLANT SYSTEMATICS , 1969 .

[28]  R. J. Pool,et al.  Plant Succession. An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation , 1917 .

[29]  J. E. Weaver,et al.  Ecology and Relative Importance of the Dominants of Tall-Grass Prairie , 1932, Botanical Gazette.

[30]  F. A. Bazzaz,et al.  Plant Species Diversity in Old‐Field Successional Ecosystems in Southern Illinois , 1975 .

[31]  G. Stebbins Experimental Studies on the Nature of Species. Volume V: Biosystematics, Genetics, and Physiological Ecology of the Erythranthe Section of Mimulus.William M. Hiesey , Malcolm A. Nobs , Olle Bjorkman , 1972 .

[32]  Y. Linhart INTRA‐POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION IN ANNUAL PLANTS I. VERONICA PEREGRINA L. RAISED UNDER NON‐COMPETITIVE CONDITIONS , 1974, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[33]  G. Hardin The competitive exclusion principle. , 1960, Science.

[34]  H. Gleason,et al.  The individualistic concept of the plant association , 1939 .

[35]  J. Terborgh On the Notion of Favorableness in Plant Ecology , 1973, The American Naturalist.

[36]  A. Auclair,et al.  Diversity Relations of Upland Forests in the Western Great Lakes Area , 1971, The American Naturalist.

[37]  E. Odum Organic Production and Turnover in Old Field Succession , 1960 .

[38]  A. Bradshaw,et al.  Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations II. Agrostis stolonifera in maritime habitats , 1966, Heredity.

[39]  J. Heslop-Harrison Forty Years of Genecology , 1964 .

[40]  J. Thoday,et al.  Isolation by Disruptive Selection , 1962, Nature.

[41]  H. N. Barber Selection in natural populations , 1965, Heredity.

[42]  J. T. Curtis,et al.  The Vegetation of Wisconsin , 1962 .

[43]  S WRIGHT,et al.  Genetical Structure of Populations , 1950, British medical journal.

[44]  V. Grant The regulation of recombination in plants. , 1958, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[45]  W. Reiners,et al.  Plant Diversity in a Chronosequence at Glacier Bay, Alaska , 1971 .

[46]  R. Whittaker Evolution and measurement of species diversity , 1972 .

[47]  Robert H. Whittaker,et al.  Vegetation of the Santa Catalina Mountains, Arizona: A Gradient Analysis of the South Slope , 1965 .

[48]  H. Gleason,et al.  The Structure and Development of the Plant Association , 1917 .

[49]  F. Bazzaz,et al.  Interference of winter annuals with Ambrosia artemisiifolia in early successional fields , 1975 .