Biodiversity Conservation in Metacommunity Networks: Linking Pattern and Persistence

A central goal of conservation science is to identify the most important habitat patches for maintaining biodiversity on a landscape. Spatial biodiversity patterns are often used for such assessments, and patches that harbor unique diversity are generally prioritized over those with high community similarity to other areas. This places an emphasis on biodiversity representation, but removing a patch can have cascading effects on biodiversity persistence in the remaining ecological communities. Metacommunity theory provides a mechanistic route to the linking of biodiversity patterns on a landscape with the subsequent dynamics of diversity loss after habitat is degraded. Using spatially explicit neutral theory, I focus on the situation where spatial patterns of diversity and similarity are generated by the structure of dispersal networks and not environmental gradients. I find that gains in biodiversity representation are nullified by losses in persistence, and as a result the effects of removing a patch on metacommunity diversity are essentially independent of complementarity or other biodiversity patterns. In this scenario, maximizing protected area and not biodiversity representation is the key to maintaining diversity in the long term. These results highlight the need for a broader understanding of how conservation paradigms perform under different models of metacommunity dynamics.

[1]  Robert S Schick,et al.  Graph models of habitat mosaics. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[2]  Fangliang He,et al.  Hubbell's fundamental biodiversity parameter and the Simpson diversity index , 2005 .

[3]  L. Jost Entropy and diversity , 2006 .

[4]  Karl Cottenie,et al.  Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[5]  E. H. Simpson Measurement of Diversity , 1949, Nature.

[6]  Timothy H Keitt,et al.  Species diversity in neutral metacommunities: a network approach. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[7]  Jared M. Diamond,et al.  THE ISLAND DILEMMA: LESSONS OF MODERN BIOGEOGRAPHIC STUDIES FOR THE DESIGN OF NATURAL RESERVES , 1975 .

[8]  M. Nowak,et al.  Habitat destruction and the extinction debt , 1994, Nature.

[9]  W. Bossert,et al.  The Measurement of Diversity , 2001 .

[10]  T. Nagylaki Geographical invariance in population genetics. , 1982, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  J. L. Gittleman,et al.  The Future of Biodiversity , 1995, Science.

[12]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities , 2000, Nature.

[13]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: A GRAPH‐THEORETIC PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[14]  Rampal S. Etienne,et al.  A new sampling formula for neutral biodiversity , 2005 .

[15]  Karin Frank,et al.  RANKING METAPOPULATION EXTINCTION RISK: FROM PATTERNS IN DATA TO CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT DECISIONS , 2003 .

[16]  Karin Frank,et al.  A new method for conservation planning for the persistence of multiple species. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[17]  J. Watson,et al.  Conservation Biogeography: assessment and prospect , 2005 .

[18]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Beta-Diversity in Tropical Forest Trees , 2002, Science.

[19]  Rodolfo Dirzo,et al.  Global State of Biodiversity and Loss , 2003 .

[20]  A. Chao,et al.  Partitioning diversity for conservation analyses , 2010 .

[21]  Mar Cabeza,et al.  Habitat loss and connectivity of reserve networks in probability approaches to reserve design , 2003 .

[22]  M. Hill Diversity and Evenness: A Unifying Notation and Its Consequences , 1973 .

[23]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Making conservation decisions under uncertainty for the persistence of multiple species. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[24]  Y. Iwasa,et al.  Neutral theory as a predictor of avifaunal extinctions after habitat loss , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  James Rosindell,et al.  Unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography , 2010, Scholarpedia.

[26]  William F. Laurance,et al.  Theory meets reality: How habitat fragmentation research has transcended island biogeographic theory , 2008 .

[27]  H. Mooney,et al.  Human Domination of Earth’s Ecosystems , 1997, Renewable Energy.

[28]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  The zero-sum assumption in neutral biodiversity theory. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[30]  R. Muneepeerakul,et al.  Neutral metacommunity models predict fish diversity patterns in Mississippi–Missouri basin , 2008, Nature.

[31]  A. Lombard,et al.  The tortoises (Testudinidae) and terrapins (Pelomedusidae) of southern Africa: their diversity, distribution and conservation , 1995 .

[32]  Stephen J Cornell,et al.  Species-area relationships from a spatially explicit neutral model in an infinite landscape. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[33]  G. Malécot,et al.  Les mathématiques de l'hérédité , 1948 .

[34]  M Cabeza,et al.  Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[35]  J. Gamarra,et al.  Metapopulation Ecology , 2007 .

[36]  Valerie Kapos,et al.  The biological dynamics of tropical rainforest fragments A prospective comparison of fragments and continuous forest , 1992 .

[37]  Jon Norberg,et al.  A Network Approach for Analyzing Spatially Structured Populations in Fragmented Landscape , 2007, Landscape Ecology.

[38]  D. Simberloff,et al.  Island Biogeography Theory and Conservation Practice , 1976, Science.

[39]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology , 2004 .

[40]  M. Rosenzweig Loss of speciation rate will impoverish future diversity , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Immigration and the Maintenance of Local Species Diversity , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[42]  S. Andelman,et al.  Mathematical Methods for Identifying Representative Reserve Networks , 2000 .

[43]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[44]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Efficiency in conservation evaluation: Scoring versus iterative approaches , 1989 .

[45]  Jérôme Chave,et al.  Neutral theory and community ecology , 2004 .

[46]  Franz J. Weissing,et al.  Modes of speciation and the neutral theory of biodiversity , 2007 .

[47]  Evan P. Economo,et al.  Network isolation and local diversity in neutral metacommunities , 2010 .

[48]  R. L. Pressey,et al.  Persistence and vulnerability: Retaining biodiversity in the landscape and in protected areas , 2002, Journal of Biosciences.

[49]  Thomas Elmqvist,et al.  Network analysis in conservation biogeography: challenges and opportunities , 2010 .

[50]  Rampal S Etienne,et al.  Protracted speciation revitalizes the neutral theory of biodiversity. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[51]  W. Laurance,et al.  Can Neutral Theory Predict the Responses of Amazonian Tree Communities to Forest Fragmentation?* , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[52]  Michael L. Rosenzweig,et al.  Species Diversity in Space and Time , 1997 .

[53]  M. Araújo,et al.  The Bias of Complementarity Hotspots toward Marginal Populations , 2001 .

[54]  S. Hubbell,et al.  How many tree species are there in the Amazon and how many of them will go extinct? , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  Daniel P. Faith,et al.  Integrating Phylogenetic Diversity, Complementarity, and Endemism for Conservation Assessment , 2004 .

[56]  Graham Bell,et al.  The Distribution of Abundance in Neutral Communities , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[57]  R. Hobbs,et al.  Biological Consequences of Ecosystem Fragmentation: A Review , 1991 .