The role of adaptability in promoting control and reducing failure dynamics: A mediation model

Abstract The negative impacts of failure and failure dynamics are well established. This study explores adaptability and control as factors reducing failure dynamics. The present study centers on a mediation model in which adaptability is hypothesized to enhance control, and control is hypothesized to reduce failure dynamics (anxiety, performance avoidance, self-handicapping, disengagement). The study focused on longitudinal data of N  = 969 Australian high school students. Mediation, using a bootstrapping approach, was tested with structural equation modeling. Findings showed that control significantly mediated the relationship between adaptability and failure dynamics: adaptability positively predicted control and control was associated with reduced failure dynamics. Furthermore, analyses led to the rejection of an alternative mediation model in which adaptability operates as the mediator between control and failure dynamics. These findings offer conceptual and empirical direction for researchers and practitioners seeking to enhance students' control and adaptability and reduce failure dynamics in their academic lives.

[1]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance , 2002 .

[2]  M. Seligman,et al.  Learned helplessness in humans: critique and reformulation. , 1978, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[3]  Andrew J. Martin.  Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. , 2007, The British journal of educational psychology.

[4]  John Hattie,et al.  Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement , 2008 .

[5]  R. Schulz,et al.  A life-span theory of control. , 1995, Psychological review.

[6]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, appraisal, and coping , 1974 .

[7]  N. Cantor,et al.  Defensive pessimism: harnessing anxiety as motivation. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  P. Nagabhushan.  Academic Motivation and Engagement: An Examination of its Factor Structure in Senior School Years , 2012 .

[9]  M. Tomasik,et al.  Life choices well made: How selective control strategies relate to career and partner decision processes , 2010 .

[10]  Joseph R. Ferrari,et al.  Procrastinators and perfect behavior: An exploratory factor analysis of self-presentation, self-awareness, and self-handicapping components. , 1992 .

[11]  M. Covington.  Making the Grade: A Self-Worth Perspective on Motivation and School Reform , 1992 .

[12]  E. Skinner.  A guide to constructs of control. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  A. Elliot,et al.  The Intergenerational Transmission of Fear of Failure , 2004, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[14]  H. Marsh,et al.  Effects of Metacognitive Strategy Training within a Cooperative Group Learning Context on Computer Achievement and Anxiety: An Aptitude-Treatment Interaction Study , 1997 .

[15]  Andrew J. Martin.  Motivation and Engagement Across the Academic Life Span , 2009 .

[16]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  The Motivation and Engagement Scale: Theoretical Framework, Psychometric Properties, and Applied Yields , 2012 .

[17]  Richard G. Lomax,et al.  A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling , 2022 .

[18]  Andrew J. Martin.  Exploring the effects of a youth enrichment program on academic motivation and engagement , 2005 .

[19]  M. Pinquart,et al.  Human development in times of social change: Theoretical considerations and research needs , 2004 .

[20]  Ted Thompson,et al.  Self‐worth Protection: review and implications for the classroom , 1994 .

[21]  Stephanie M Plenty,et al.  Mathematics motivation and engagement: an independent evaluation of a complex model with Australian rural high school students , 2011 .

[22]  Anthony Elliott,et al.  The new individualism: the emotional costs of globalization , 2009 .

[23]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[24]  J. Connell,et al.  A new multidimensional measure of children's perceptions of control. , 1985, Child development.

[25]  D. Curtis,et al.  School non-completers: Profiles and initial destinations , 2008 .

[26]  F. Chen.  Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance , 2007 .

[27]  R. Schulz,et al.  A life span model of successful aging. , 1996, The American psychologist.

[28]  M. Covington.  Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: an integrative review. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[29]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. , 1990 .

[30]  M. Tomasik,et al.  Demands of Social Change as a Function of the Political Context, Institutional Filters, and Psychosocial Resources , 2009 .

[31]  Andrew J. Martin.  Academic buoyancy and academic outcomes: towards a further understanding of students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), students without ADHD, and academic buoyancy itself. , 2014, The British journal of educational psychology.

[32]  D. Mcclelland,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF MOTIVE ACQUISITION. , 1965, The American psychologist.

[33]  M. Tomasik,et al.  Is it adaptive to disengage from demands of social change? Adjustment to developmental barriers in opportunity-deprived regions , 2010, Motivation and emotion.

[34]  J. W. Atkinson.  Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. , 1957, Psychological review.

[35]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  Adaptability: Conceptual and Empirical Perspectives on Responses to Change, Novelty and Uncertainty , 2012, Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling.

[36]  B. Byrne.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[37]  Richard Schulz,et al.  Health stresses and depressive symptomatology in the elderly: the importance of health engagement control strategies. , 2002, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[38]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[39]  J. Finn,et al.  Academic success among students at risk for school failure. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[40]  Andrew J. Martin.  Enhancing student motivation and engagement: The effects of a multidimensional intervention ☆ , 2008 .

[41]  Erik Morales.  A Contextual Understanding of the Process of Educational Resilience: High Achieving Dominican American Students and the “Resilience Cycle” , 2000 .

[42]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  Adaptability: How students’ responses to uncertainty and novelty predict their academic and non-academic outcomes. , 2013 .

[43]  Andrew J. Martin.  Prescriptive Statements and Educational Practice: What Can Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Offer? , 2011 .

[44]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  Self-handicapping and defensive pessimism : exploring a model of predictors and outcomes from a self-protection perspective. , 2001 .

[45]  Jacquelynne S. Eccles,et al.  Predictors of math anxiety and its influence on young adolescents' course enrollment intentions and performance in mathematics , 1990 .

[46]  S. West,et al.  A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[47]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  Motivation and Engagement in English, Mathematics and Science High School Subjects: Towards an Understanding of Multidimensional Domain Specificity. , 2007 .

[48]  J. Weisz,et al.  Changing the world and changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control. , 1982 .

[49]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  Academic resilience and academic buoyancy: multidimensional and hierarchical conceptual framing of causes, correlates and cognate constructs , 2009 .

[50]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  Fear of failure: Friend or foe? , 2003 .

[51]  Stephanie M Plenty,et al.  A multidimensional analysis of changes in mathematics motivation and engagement during high school , 2013 .

[52]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[53]  John Hattie,et al.  Visible learning for teachers: maximizing impact on learning, 1st Edition , 2012 .

[54]  A. Elliot.  A Conceptual History of the Achievement Goal Construct. , 2005 .

[55]  D. Putwain,et al.  Is academic buoyancy anything more than adaptive coping? , 2012, Anxiety, stress, and coping.

[56]  A. Masten.  Ordinary magic. Resilience processes in development. , 2001, The American psychologist.

[57]  Raymond L. Debus,et al.  Do Self-Concept Interventions Make a Difference? A Synergistic Blend of Construct Validation and Meta-Analysis , 2006 .

[58]  Richard Schulz,et al.  A motivational theory of life-span development. , 2010, Psychological review.