Political generations, micro-cohorts, and the transformation of social movements

In this paper the author proposes a generational model of continuity and change in social movements. Building on political generation and cohort replacement theories, he offers three propositions about generational processes in social movements : (1) the collective identity of an activist cohort remains consistent over time, contributing to movement continuity; (2) cohorts construct different collective identities based on the external contexts and internal conditions of the movement at the time they enter; (3) cohort replacement contributes to change in social movements. These three generational processes interact with organizational factors and political opportunity structures to shape movement continuity and change. He illustrates these propositions by drawing on an in-depth case study of the women's movement from 1969 to 1992 in Columbus, Ohio, and he suggests key questions about generational processes in other cases

[1]  James D. Thompson,et al.  The Regeneration of Social Organizations , 1971 .

[2]  Paul R. Lichterman.  Piecing together multicultural community : cultural differences in community building among grass-roots environmentalists , 1995 .

[3]  J. Gusfield.  The Problem of Generations in an Organizational Structure , 1957 .

[4]  Sidney Tarrow,et al.  Democracy and disorder : protest and politics in Italy, 1965-1975 , 1990 .

[5]  Willard L. Rodgers,et al.  ESTIMABLE FUNCTIONS OF AGE, PERIOD, AND COHORT EFFECTS* , 1982 .

[6]  N. Glenn,et al.  Cohort Analysts' Futile Quest: Statistical Attempts to Separate Age, Period and Cohort Effects , 1976 .

[7]  J. Fendrich,et al.  Back to the Future: Adult Political Behavior of Former Student Activists , 1988 .

[8]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Organizational Memory , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[9]  Faye Ginsburg,et al.  Contested Lives: The Abortion Debate in an American Community , 1989 .

[10]  V. Taylor.  SOCIAL MOVEMENT CONTINUITY: THE WOMEN'S MOVEMENT IN ABEYANCE* , 1989 .

[11]  W. Gamson,et al.  Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Framing political opportunity , 1996 .

[12]  R. Turner,et al.  The Transition from Student to Adult Politics , 1989 .

[13]  D. Alwin.  Cohort Replacement and Changes in Parental Socialization Values. , 1990 .

[14]  J. D. McCarthy,et al.  Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  D. S. Meyer,et al.  Social Movement Spillover , 1994 .

[16]  V. Taylor,et al.  Survival in the Doldrums: The American Women's Rights Movement, 1945 to the 1960s. , 1989 .

[17]  N. Ryder.  The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. , 1965, American sociological review.

[18]  Debra C. Minkoff.  The Organization of Survival: Women's and Racial-Ethnic Voluntarist and Activist Organizations, 1955–1985 , 1993 .

[19]  S. Staggenborg,et al.  Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of Political Opportunity , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  Robert D. Benford,et al.  Master-frames and cycles of protest , 1992 .

[21]  William A. Gamson,et al.  The social psychology of collective action. , 1992 .

[22]  Edward S. Greenberg,et al.  If I Had a Hammer—The Death of the Old Left and the Birth of the New Left . By Isserman Maurice. New York: Basic Books, 1987. 259p. $18.95. , 1988, American Political Science Review.

[23]  Joseph R. DeMartini,et al.  Generational Relationships and Social Movement Participation , 1992 .

[24]  Hanspeter Kriesi,et al.  New social movements in Western Europe. A comparative analysis , 1995 .

[25]  Richard G. Braungart.  The Sociology of Generations and Student Politics: A Comparison of the Functionalist and Generational Unit Models , 1974 .