Adaptive Loop Transfer Recovery

DAPTIVE control is an attractive approach in nonlinear systems theory due to its ability to cope with system uncertainties and failures. Adaptive controllers can be classified as either indirect or direct. This paper focuses on improving the robustness of a direct adaptive control design. The method is arrived at by examining the loop transfer properties of an adaptive system when linearized about an equilibrium condition. The design approach modifiesanadaptivelawwiththegoalofpreservingthelooptransfer propertiesofareferencemodelassociatedwithanonadaptivecontrol design. The aim is to achieve an adaptive system that preserves the stability margins of a nonadaptive design, while at the same time providing the benefits of adaptation to modeling error. Many modification terms are reported in the literature [1–11]. Included among these, � modification [1] adds a pure damping term to the adaptive law, whereas e modification [2] adds a variable damping term that depends on the error signal. These terms are introduced to ensure that the adapted weights remain bounded. Backgroundlearning[3–5]usescurrentandpastdataconcurrentlyin the adaptation process. It allows the adaptation law to continually train in the background based on past data, while still being responsivetodynamicchangesbasedonthecurrentdata.Inthisway, background learning incorporates long-term learning. Q modification [6–8] is similar in spirit to background learning in its intent to improve adaptation performance by using a moving window of the integrated system uncertainty. There is an optimal control theory based modification term that improves adaptation in the presence of large adaptive gain [9]. More recently, a Kalman filter modification approach[10]hasbeenintroducedasamodificationterminadaptive control.Kalman filtermodificationleadstoalternativeformsforwell

[1]  Eric N. Johnson,et al.  Control of multivehicle systems in the presence of uncertain dynamics , 2013, Int. J. Control.

[2]  Hassan K. Khalil,et al.  Singular perturbation methods in control : analysis and design , 1986 .

[3]  Tansel Yucelen,et al.  Low-frequency learning and fast adaptation in model reference adaptive control for safety-critical systems , 2013, 2013 American Control Conference.

[4]  Weiping Li,et al.  Applied Nonlinear Control , 1991 .

[5]  Girish Chowdhary,et al.  A Comparison of Two Novel Direct Adaptive Control Methods under Actuator Failure Accommodation , 2008 .

[6]  Luis Mejías Alvarez,et al.  A neural-network based flight controller for UASs , 2013 .

[7]  Petar V. Kokotovic,et al.  Instability analysis and improvement of robustness of adaptive control , 1984, Autom..

[8]  Jovan D. Boskovic,et al.  An Optimal Control Modification to Model-Reference Adaptive Control for Fast Adaptation , 2008 .

[9]  W. Wasow Asymptotic expansions for ordinary differential equations , 1965 .

[10]  Girish Chowdhary,et al.  Theory and flight test validation of long term learning adaptive flight controller , 2008 .

[11]  D. Naidu,et al.  Singular Perturbations and Time Scales in Guidance and Control of Aerospace Systems: A Survey , 2001 .

[12]  L. Praly,et al.  Adaptive nonlinear regulation: estimation from the Lyapunov equation , 1992 .

[13]  K. Y. Volyanskyy,et al.  An Error Minimization Method in Adaptive Control , 2006 .

[14]  Girish Chowdhary,et al.  Guidance and Control of Airplanes Under Actuator Failures and Severe Structural Damage , 2013 .

[15]  Anthony J. Calise,et al.  K-modification in Adaptive Control , 2010 .

[16]  A. Calise,et al.  Kalman Filter Modification in Adaptive Control , 2010 .

[17]  Anthony J. Calise,et al.  A New Neuroadaptive Control Architecture for Nonlinear Uncertain Dynamical Systems: Beyond $\sigma $- and $e$-Modifications , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[18]  Tansel Yucelen,et al.  Low-frequency learning and fast adaptation in model reference adaptive control for safety-critical systems , 2013, 2013 American Control Conference.

[19]  A.J. Calise,et al.  A novel Q-modification term for adaptive control , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[20]  Frank L. Lewis,et al.  Multilayer neural-net robot controller with guaranteed tracking performance , 1996, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[21]  Anthony J. Calise,et al.  A new neuroadaptive control architecture for nonlinear uncertain dynamical systems: Beyond σ- and e-modifications , 2008, 2008 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[22]  Seung-Min Oh,et al.  Adaptive control using combined online and background learning neural network , 2004, 2004 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37601).

[23]  K. Narendra,et al.  A New Adaptive Law for Robust Adaptation without Persistent Excitation , 1986, 1986 American Control Conference.

[24]  Eric N. Johnson,et al.  Improving transient performance of adaptive control architectures using frequency-limited system error dynamics , 2013, Int. J. Control.

[25]  Kevin A. Wise,et al.  Robust and Adaptive Control of X-45A J-UCAS: A Design Trade Study , 2011 .

[26]  Eric N. Johnson,et al.  Frequency-limited adaptive control architecture for transient response improvement , 2013, 2013 American Control Conference.