A multiphase level-set approach for all-Mach numbers

Abstract In this work, an alternate level-set-based approach is presented that applies uniformly to compressible and incompressible multiphase flows. Fundamental to this work, is the development of analytic transformations from a signed-distance function to species-mass conservation variables. Such transformations can be used to highlight compressible flow difficulties for level set methods, and develop interfacial reinitialization procedures based on different primitive variables. The proposed all-Mach method is based on preserving signed-distance functions within the context of a species-mass conservation equation to evolve the interface, and includes several reinitialization procedures that maintain the spirit of the signed distance function. In addition, we explore hybrid level-set reinitialization procedures that handle sub-grid-scale interfacial breakup. The model is demonstrated on concepts relevant to high-speed marine vehicles based on supercavitation, where a gaseous cavity surrounds a moving vehicle. Results indicate that the present algorithm preserves higher-order numerics, performs well on several incompressible and compressible validation cases, and extends to unsteady, three-dimensional flow.

[1]  V. Semenenko Artificial Supercavitation. Physics and Calculation , 2001 .

[2]  Rémi Abgrall,et al.  Computations of compressible multifluids , 2001 .

[3]  D. R. Stinebring,et al.  A preconditioned Navier–Stokes method for two-phase flows with application to cavitation prediction , 2000 .

[4]  Smadar Karni,et al.  Multicomponent Flow Calculations by a Consistent Primitive Algorithm , 1994 .

[5]  S. Osher,et al.  A Non-oscillatory Eulerian Approach to Interfaces in Multimaterial Flows (the Ghost Fluid Method) , 1999 .

[6]  Heinz Pitsch,et al.  An accurate conservative level set/ghost fluid method for simulating turbulent atomization , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[7]  R. Kunz,et al.  A Level-Set Approach for Compressible, Multiphase Fluid Flows with Mass Transfer , 2009 .

[8]  M. Strelets Detached eddy simulation of massively separated flows , 2001 .

[9]  D. R. Stinebring,et al.  High Reynolds Number, Unsteady, Multiphase CFD Modeling of Cavitating Flows , 2002 .

[10]  J. Sethian,et al.  Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations , 1988 .

[11]  J. Edwards A low-diffusion flux-splitting scheme for Navier-Stokes calculations , 1997 .

[12]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method , 1979 .

[13]  Kenneth E. Jansen,et al.  Hydrodynamic simulation of air bubble implosion using a level set approach , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[14]  Robert F. Kunz,et al.  UNSTEADY RANS AND DETACHED EDDY SIMULATIONS OF CAVITATING FLOW OVER A HYDROFOIL , 2003 .

[15]  Emilio F. Campana,et al.  Free-surface fluctuations behind microbreakers: space–time behaviour and subsurface flow field , 2005, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  P. Roe Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes , 1997 .

[17]  J. Sethian,et al.  LEVEL SET METHODS FOR FLUID INTERFACES , 2003 .

[18]  Meng-Sing Liou,et al.  A sequel to AUSM, Part II: AUSM+-up for all speeds , 2006, J. Comput. Phys..

[19]  G. Kreiss,et al.  A conservative level set method for two phase flow II , 2005, Journal of Computational Physics.

[20]  Vineet Ahuja,et al.  Numerical Study of Cavitation in Cryogenic Fluids , 2005 .

[21]  Rémi Abgrall,et al.  Ghost-Fluids for the Poor: A Single Fluid Algorithm for Multifluids , 2001 .

[22]  M. Wosnik,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF A VENTILATED SUPERCAVITATING VEHICLE , 2003 .

[23]  S. Osher,et al.  Computing interface motion in compressible gas dynamics , 1992 .

[24]  C. Merkle,et al.  Computation of Multiphase Mixture Flows with Compressibility Effects , 2002 .

[25]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  A higher-order generalized ghost fluid method for the poor for the three-dimensional two-phase flow computation of underwater implosions , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[26]  Smadar Karni,et al.  Hybrid Multifluid Algorithms , 1996, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[27]  Vineet Ahuja,et al.  Simulations of cavitating flows using hybrid unstructured meshes , 2001 .

[28]  S. Osher,et al.  A level set approach for computing solutions to incompressible two-phase flow , 1994 .

[29]  Michael P. Kinzel Computational techniques and analysis of cavitating-fluid flows , 2008 .

[30]  Mark Sussman,et al.  The Numerical Simulation of Ship Waves using Cartesian Grid Methods , 2014, 1410.1952.

[31]  Feng Xiao,et al.  A simple algebraic interface capturing scheme using hyperbolic tangent function , 2005 .

[32]  Meng-Sing Liou,et al.  Numerical prediction of interfacial instabilities: Sharp interface method (SIM) , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..