Distractor strength and selective attention in picture-naming performance

Whereas it has long been assumed that competition plays a role in lexical selection in word production (e.g., Levelt, Roelofs, & Meyer, 1999), recently Finkbeiner and Caramazza (2006) argued against the competition assumption on the basis of their observation that visible distractors yield semantic interference in picture naming, whereas masked distractors yield semantic facilitation. We examined an alternative account of these findings that preserves the competition assumption. According to this account, the interference and facilitation effects of distractor words reflect whether or not distractors are strong enough to exceed a threshold for entering the competition process. We report two experiments in which distractor strength was manipulated by means of coactivation and visibility. Naming performance was assessed in terms of mean response time (RT) and RT distributions. In Experiment 1, with low coactivation, semantic facilitation was obtained from clearly visible distractors, whereas poorly visible distractors yielded no semantic effect. In Experiment 2, with high coactivation, semantic interference was obtained from both clearly and poorly visible distractors. These findings support the competition threshold account of the polarity of semantic effects in naming.

[1]  W. Glaser,et al.  The time course of picture-word interference. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  J. Deutsch.  Perception and Communication , 1958, Nature.

[3]  Kevin Diependaele,et al.  Masked repetition and phonological priming within and across modalities. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production : Picture word interference studies , 1990 .

[5]  S Lehéricy,et al.  The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Selective attention and response set in the Stroop task , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[8]  G. S. Klein,et al.  SEMANTIC POWER MEASURED THROUGH THE INTERFERENCE OF WORDS WITH COLOR-NAMING. , 1964, The American journal of psychology.

[9]  Albert Costa,et al.  Set size and repetition in the picture–word interference paradigm: implications for models of naming , 2001, Cognition.

[10]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Selective attention and distractor frequency in naming performance: comment on Dhooge and Hartsuiker (2010). , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Twenty-first century psycholinguistics : four cornerstones , 2005 .

[13]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Semantic interference in immediate and delayed naming and reading: Attention and task decisions , 2011 .

[14]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Dynamics of the attentional control of word retrieval: analyses of response time distributions. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  R. Ratcliff.  Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Now You See it, Now you Don't: On Turning Semantic Interference Into Facilitation in a Stroop-Like Task , 2006, Cortex.

[17]  W. Heij,et al.  Nonverbal Context Effects in Forward and Backward Word Translation: Evidence for Concept Mediation , 1996 .

[18]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Attention and Gaze Control in Picture Naming, Word Reading, and Word Categorizing. , 2007 .

[20]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. , 2003, Psychological review.

[21]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Stimulus Set and Response Set: The Alternation of Attention , 1964 .

[22]  Albert Costa,et al.  On the categorical nature of the semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[23]  Chris Davis,et al.  The density constraint on form-priming in the naming task: interference effects from a masked prime , 1991 .

[24]  Wido La Heij,et al.  In Defense of the Lexical-Competition Account of Picture-Word Interference: A Comment On Finkbeiner and Caramazza (2006) , 2006, Cortex.

[25]  J B Poline,et al.  Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  Frank Oppermann,et al.  Is there semantic interference in delayed naming? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  Rasha Abdel Rahman,et al.  Now you see it … and now again: Semantic interference reflects lexical competition in speech production with and without articulation , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  A. Roelofs.  Tracing attention and the activation flow of spoken word planning using eye movements. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  From Popper to Lakatos: A case for cumulative computational modeling , 2005 .

[30]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[31]  S. Petersen,et al.  Neuroimaging studies of word reading. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  D. Mewhort,et al.  Analysis of Response Time Distributions: An Example Using the Stroop Task , 1991 .

[33]  Elizabeth A. Hirshorn,et al.  Localizing interference during naming: Convergent neuroimaging and neuropsychological evidence for the function of Broca's area , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Testing a non-decompositional theory of lemma retrieval in speaking: Retrieval of verbs , 1993, Cognition.

[35]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  S. Coren,et al.  Attention : contemporary theory and analysis , 1972 .

[37]  Claudio Mulatti,et al.  Picture–word interference and the response–exclusion hypothesis , 2012, Cortex.

[38]  J. Segui,et al.  Semantic and Associative Priming in Picture Naming , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[39]  Irene P. Kan,et al.  Effect of name agreement on prefrontal activity during overt and covert picture naming , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[40]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  The distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence for response exclusion. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Context effects and selective attention in picture naming and word reading: Competition versus response exclusion , 2013 .

[42]  Rachel Jones.  Visual attention: Now you see it... , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[43]  W. Heij,et al.  Categorical interference and associative priming in picture naming. , 1990 .

[44]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Attention to Spoken Word Planning: Chronometric and Neuroimaging Evidence , 2008, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[45]  Mike Grace,et al.  Now you see it ..... , 2000, British Dental Journal.

[46]  Albert Costa,et al.  The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: does the response set matter? , 2000, Cognition.

[47]  A. Roelofs,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking , 1992, Cognition.

[48]  Donald E. Broadbent,et al.  Decision and stress , 1971 .

[49]  P. Starreveld,et al.  Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. , 1996 .

[50]  Albert Costa,et al.  A further look at semantic context effects in language production: The role of response congruency , 2006 .

[51]  Richard R. Rosinski,et al.  Picture-word interference is semantically based. , 1977 .

[52]  Alissa Melinger,et al.  Semantic context effects in language production: A swinging lexical network proposal and a review , 2009 .

[53]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Set size and repetition matter: comment on Caramazza and Costa (2000) , 2001, Cognition.

[54]  W. Levelt,et al.  Semantic distance effects on object and action naming , 2002, Cognition.

[55]  Robert J Hartsuiker,et al.  The distractor frequency effect in a delayed picture-word interference task: further evidence for a late locus of distractor exclusion , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[56]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Mix, a program for pseudorandomization , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[57]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Context effects of pictures and words in naming objects, reading words, and generating simple phrases , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[58]  A. Caramazza,et al.  When more is less: a counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.