Evaluating Abstract Art: Relation between Term Usage, Subjective Ratings, Image Properties and Personality Traits

One of the major challenges in experimental aesthetics is the uncertainty of the terminology used in experiments. In this study, we recorded terms that are spontaneously used by participants to describe abstract artworks and studied their relation to the second-order statistical image properties of the same artworks (Experiment 1). We found that the usage frequency of some structure-describing terms correlates with statistical image properties, such as PHOG Self-Similarity, Anisotropy and Complexity. Additionally, emotion-associated terms correlate with measured color values. Next, based on the most frequently used terms, we created five different rating scales (Experiment 2) and obtained ratings of participants for the abstract paintings on these scales. We found significant correlations between descriptive score ratings (e.g., between structure and subjective complexity), between evaluative and descriptive score ratings (e.g., between preference and subjective complexity/interest) and between descriptive score ratings and statistical image properties (e.g., between interest and PHOG Self-Similarity, Complexity and Anisotropy). Additionally, we determined the participants’ personality traits as described in the ‘Big Five Inventory’ (Goldberg, 1990; Rammstedt and John, 2005) and correlated them with the ratings and preferences of individual participants. Participants with higher scores for Neuroticism showed preferences for objectively more complex images, as well as a different notion of the term complex when compared with participants with lower scores for Neuroticism. In conclusion, this study demonstrates an association between objectively measured image properties and the subjective terms that participants use to describe or evaluate abstract artworks. Moreover, our results suggest that the description of abstract artworks, their evaluation and the preference of participants for their low-level statistical properties are linked to personality traits.

[1]  P. Russell.  Testing the Aesthetic Significance of the Golden-Section Rectangle , 2000, Perception.

[2]  T. Jacobsen,et al.  Aesthetic Judgments of Novel Graphic Patterns: Analyses of Individual Judgments , 2002, Perceptual and motor skills.

[3]  Joachim Denzler,et al.  PHOG-Derived Aesthetic Measures Applied to Color Photographs of Artworks, Natural Scenes and Objects , 2012, ECCV Workshops.

[4]  C. Redies,et al.  Statistical regularities in art: Relations with visual coding and perception , 2010, Vision Research.

[5]  Marcos Nadal Roberts.  Complexity and aesthetic preference for diverse visual stimuli , 2007 .

[6]  Claudia Mello-Thoms,et al.  Visual interest in pictorial art during an aesthetic experience. , 2007, Spatial vision.

[7]  Mateu Sbert,et al.  Informational Aesthetics Measures , 2008, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[8]  A. Chatterjee,et al.  Neuroaesthetics , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  J. Wagemans,et al.  All is beautiful? Generality vs. specificity of word usage in visual aesthetics. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[10]  H. Leder,et al.  A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. , 2004, British journal of psychology.

[11]  Oscar García,et al.  Relationships among extraversion, openness to experience, and sensation seeking , 2003 .

[12]  Richard J. Colwell.  Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward An Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation , 1975 .

[13]  James Ze Wang,et al.  Studying Aesthetics in Photographic Images Using a Computational Approach , 2006, ECCV.

[14]  Brian R. Baucom,et al.  Psychological Trauma : Theory , Research , Practice , and Policy Validation of the Five-Factor Model of PTSD Symptom Structure Among Delinquent Youth , 2015 .

[15]  Joachim Denzler,et al.  PHOG analysis of self-similarity in aesthetic images , 2012, Electronic Imaging.

[16]  C. Cela-Conde,et al.  Predicting beauty: fractal dimension and visual complexity in art. , 2011, British journal of psychology.

[17]  P. Costa,et al.  Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  Karen B. Schloss,et al.  An ecological valence theory of human color preference , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  Personality and preference for surreal paintings , 1997 .

[20]  I C McManus,et al.  The aesthetics of simple figures. , 1980, British journal of psychology.

[21]  Karen B. Schloss,et al.  An ecological valence theory of human color preferences , 2010 .

[22]  C. Redies,et al.  Combining universal beauty and cultural context in a unifying model of visual aesthetic experience , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[23]  Joachim Denzler,et al.  Statistical image properties of print advertisements, visual artworks and images of architecture , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[24]  Gerald C. Cupchik,et al.  Interest and Pleasure as Dimensions of Aesthetic Response , 1990 .

[25]  A. Tellegen,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES An Alternative "Description of Personality": The Big-Five Factor Structure , 2022 .

[26]  Beatrice Rammstedt,et al.  Kurzversion des Big Five Inventory (BFI-K): , 2005 .

[27]  D. Berlyne.  Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value , 1970 .

[28]  C. Redies,et al.  Beauty in abstract paintings: perceptual contrast and statistical properties , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[29]  Adrian Furnham,et al.  Personality and judgements of abstract, pop art, and representational paintings , 2001 .

[30]  L. Ou,et al.  A study of colour emotion and colour preference. Part I: Colour emotions for single colours , 2004 .

[31]  H. Leder,et al.  See me, feel me! Aesthetic evaluations of art portraits. , 2013 .

[32]  Helmut Leder,et al.  Mastering style - Effects of explicit style-related information, art knowledge and affective state on appreciation of abstract paintings , 2006 .

[33]  Florian Hönig.  Defining Computational Aesthetics , 2005, CAe.

[34]  G. Mather.  Artistic Adjustment of Image Spectral Slope , 2014 .

[35]  Gregory J. Feist,et al.  Openness to Experience, Non-Conformity, and the Preference for Abstract Art , 2004 .

[36]  Ana Radonjić,et al.  Implicit and explicit features of paintings. , 2008, Spatial vision.

[37]  C. Redies,et al.  Changes of Statistical Properties During the Creation of Graphic Artworks , 2015 .

[38]  Anne S. Hsu,et al.  Who art thou? Personality predictors of artistic preferences in a large UK sample: the importance of openness. , 2009, British journal of psychology.

[39]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Representing shape with a spatial pyramid kernel , 2007, CIVR '07.

[40]  Richard H. A. H. Jacobs,et al.  Liking versus Complexity: Decomposing the Inverted U-curve , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[41]  L. Ou,et al.  A study of colour emotion and colour preference. Part II: Colour emotions for two‐colour combinations , 2004 .

[42]  Paul Locher.  Contemporary experimental aesthetics: State of the art technology , 2011, i-Perception.

[43]  Paul J. Silvia,et al.  Artistic Training and Interest in Visual Art: Applying the Appraisal Model of Aesthetic Emotions , 2006 .

[44]  P. Silvia.  Emotional Responses to Art: From Collation and Arousal to Cognition and Emotion , 2005 .

[45]  B. Bastian,et al.  Painting Preference and Personality, with Particular Reference to Gray's Behavioral Inhibition and Behavioral Approach Systems , 2002 .

[46]  Slobodan Markovic,et al.  Aesthetic experience and the emotional content of paintings , 2010 .

[47]  D. Berlyne.  Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation, , 1974 .