Modelling the contribution of ephemeral wetlands to landscape connectivity
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] K. McGarigal,et al. Orientation of Movements and Habitat Selection in a Spatially Structured Population of Marbled Salamanders (Ambystoma opacum) , 2006 .
[2] L. Fahrig,et al. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure , 1993 .
[3] Jordi Bascompte,et al. Spatial network structure and amphibian persistence in stochastic environments , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[4] L. Fahrig. How much habitat is enough , 2001 .
[5] Luc Lens,et al. The importance of realistic dispersal models in conservation planning: application of a novel modelling platform to evaluate management scenarios in an Afrotropical biodiversity hotspot , 2016, The Journal of applied ecology.
[6] David A. Haukos,et al. A network model framework for prioritizing wetland conservation in the Great Plains , 2016, Landscape Ecology.
[7] M. Araújo,et al. Additive threats from pathogens, climate and land-use change for global amphibian diversity , 2011, Nature.
[8] Samuel A. Cushman,et al. Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: A review and prospectus , 2006 .
[9] M. J. Adams,et al. Amphibians in the climate vise: loss and restoration of resilience of montane wetland ecosystems in the western US , 2014 .
[10] M. Fortin,et al. EDITOR'S CHOICE: Stepping stones are crucial for species' long‐distance dispersal and range expansion through habitat networks , 2014 .
[11] R. D. Semlitsch,et al. Assessing modularity in genetic networks to manage spatially structured metapopulations , 2016 .
[12] Nancy E. McIntyre,et al. Graph theory as an invasive species management tool: case study in the Sonoran Desert , 2017, Landscape Ecology.
[13] C. Scott Findlay,et al. Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines , 2000, Nature.
[14] Dean L Urban,et al. Graph theory as a proxy for spatially explicit population models in conservation planning. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.
[15] R. Baldwin,et al. Conservation Planning for Amphibian Species with Complex Habitat Requirements: A Case Study Using Movements and Habitat Selection of the Wood Frog Rana Sylvatica , 2006 .
[16] J. Maerz,et al. Integrating Ecophysiological and Agent-Based Models to Simulate How Behavior Moderates Salamander Sensitivity to Climate , 2019, Front. Ecol. Evol..
[17] E. Werner,et al. Turnover in an amphibian metacommunity : the role of local and regional factors , 2007 .
[18] R. D. Semlitsch,et al. Habitat type and distance to edge affect movement behavior of juvenile pond‐breeding salamanders , 2013 .
[19] L. Parrott,et al. Modeling cross-scale relationships between climate, hydrology, and individual animals: generating scenarios for stream salamanders , 2015, Front. Environ. Sci..
[20] M. Smith,et al. Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation : are all amphibian populations metapopulations? , 2005 .
[21] B. B. Rothermel,et al. MIGRATORY SUCCESS OF JUVENILES: A POTENTIAL CONSTRAINT ON CONNECTIVITY FOR POND‐BREEDING AMPHIBIANS , 2004 .
[22] D. Lindenmayer,et al. Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis , 2007 .
[23] D. Marsh,et al. Metapopulation Dynamics and Amphibian Conservation , 2001 .
[24] R. M’Closkey,et al. Regional Dynamics and the Status of Amphibians , 1996 .
[25] L. Fahrig,et al. On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity , 2000 .
[26] S. Swallow,et al. Are wetland regulations cost effective for species protection? A case study of amphibian metapopulations. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.
[27] H. B. Shaffer,et al. Microhabitat use and migration distance of an endangered grassland amphibian , 2013 .
[28] J. Gareth Polhill,et al. The ODD protocol: A review and first update , 2010, Ecological Modelling.
[29] E. Zavaleta,et al. Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendations , 2009 .
[30] Vladimir Batagelj,et al. Centrality in Social Networks , 1993 .
[31] Greta Bocedi,et al. RangeShifter: a platform for modelling spatial eco‐evolutionary dynamics and species' responses to environmental changes , 2014 .
[32] Aurélie Coulon,et al. Introducing a ‘stochastic movement simulator’ for estimating habitat connectivity , 2011 .
[33] R. C. Thomson,et al. The origin of tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum) populations in California, Oregon, and Nevada: introductions or relicts? , 2011, Conservation Genetics.
[34] D. Legrand,et al. Individual dispersal, landscape connectivity and ecological networks , 2013, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[35] Raymond D. Semlitsch,et al. Biological Criteria for Buffer Zones around Wetlands and Riparian Habitats for Amphibians and Reptiles , 2003 .
[36] I. Hanski,et al. Metapopulation dynamics: Does it help to have more of the same? , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[37] Neftalí Sillero,et al. The pond network: can structural connectivity reflect on (amphibian) biodiversity patterns? , 2011, Landscape Ecology.
[38] Zhiming Zhang,et al. Implementation of Diversified Ecological Networks to Strengthen Wetland Conservation , 2012 .
[39] V Latora,et al. Efficient behavior of small-world networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.
[40] C. Haddad,et al. Habitat Split and the Global Decline of Amphibians , 2007, Science.
[41] D. E. Gill. The Metapopulation Ecology of the Red‐Spotted Newt, Notophthalmus viridescens (Rafinesque) , 1978 .
[42] K. McGarigal,et al. Emigration Orientation Of Juvenile Pond-breeding Amphibians In Western Massachusetts , 2007, Copeia.
[43] C. Fonseca,et al. Habitat Split as a Cause of Local Population Declines of Amphibians with Aquatic Larvae , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.
[44] I. Hanski. Metapopulation dynamics , 1998, Nature.
[45] Kerry L. Griffis-Kyle,et al. Using nested connectivity models to resolve management conflicts of isolated water networks in the Sonoran Desert , 2017 .
[46] P. Trenham. Terrestrial Habitat Use by Adult California Tiger Salamanders , 2001 .
[47] Emilio Padoa-Schioppa,et al. Influence of Landscape Elements in Riparian Buffers on the Conservation of Semiaquatic Amphibians , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.
[48] Thorsten Wiegand,et al. Using individual-based movement models to assess inter-patch connectivity for large carnivores in fragmented landscapes , 2013 .
[49] Timothy H. Keitt,et al. LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: A GRAPH‐THEORETIC PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .
[50] A. Georges,et al. Heterogeneous wetland complexes, buffer zones, and travel corridors: Landscape management for freshwater reptiles , 2007 .
[51] R. D. Semlitsch,et al. Movement ecology of amphibians: A missing component for understanding population declines , 2014 .
[52] Michael J. North,et al. Complex adaptive systems modeling with Repast Simphony , 2013, Complex Adapt. Syst. Model..
[53] Peter C. Trenham,et al. REGIONAL DYNAMICS OF WETLAND‐BREEDING FROGS AND TOADS: TURNOVER AND SYNCHRONY , 2003 .
[54] Raymond D. Semlitsch,et al. Differentiating Migration and Dispersal Processes for Pond-Breeding Amphibians , 2008 .
[55] I. Creed,et al. Connectivity among wetlands matters for vulnerable amphibian populations in wetlandscapes , 2018, Ecological Modelling.
[56] M. Tulbure,et al. Surface water network structure, landscape resistance to movement and flooding vital for maintaining ecological connectivity across Australia’s largest river basin , 2015, Landscape Ecology.
[57] Karin Frank,et al. Breaking Functional Connectivity into Components: A Novel Approach Using an Individual-Based Model, and First Outcomes , 2011, PloS one.
[58] R. D. Semlitsch. Principles for Management of Aquatic-Breeding Amphibians , 2000 .
[59] Kerry L. Griffis-Kyle,et al. A connectivity and wildlife management conflict in isolated desert waters , 2016 .
[60] D. V. Vuren,et al. Habitat Use and Migration Behavior of the California Tiger Salamander , 1996 .
[61] Ulla Mörtberg,et al. Making graph theory operational for landscape ecological assessments, planning, and design , 2010 .
[62] R. Hobbs,et al. A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation. , 2007, Ecology letters.
[63] Mark Broich,et al. Evaluating static and dynamic landscape connectivity modelling using a 25-year remote sensing time series , 2018, Landscape Ecology.
[64] L. Freeman. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .
[65] H. B. Shaffer,et al. AMPHIBIAN UPLAND HABITAT USE AND ITS CONSEQUENCES FOR POPULATION VIABILITY , 2005 .
[66] Todd R. Lookingbill,et al. Combining a dispersal model with network theory to assess habitat connectivity. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.
[67] Luc Lens,et al. Simple individual‐based models effectively represent Afrotropical forest bird movement in complex landscapes , 2014 .
[68] R. D. Semlitsch. Burrowing ability and behavior of salamanders of the genus Ambystoma , 1983 .
[69] Mark Broich,et al. Surface-water dynamics and land use influence landscape connectivity across a major dryland region. , 2017, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.
[70] Leroy J. Walston,et al. Variation in amount of surrounding forest habitat influences the initial orientation of juvenile amphibians emigrating from breeding ponds , 2008 .