Modelling the contribution of ephemeral wetlands to landscape connectivity

Abstract Habitat loss and fragmentation continue to drive declines of amphibian populations. Maintaining connectivity between aquatic and terrestrial habitats and across wetlands is critical to amphibian conservation, particularly in regions where climate change may exacerbate habitat loss. Our objective was to study the impact of climate- and human-driven losses in ephemeral wetlands on functional connectivity for amphibians, using the endangered western tiger salamander (Ambystoma mavortium) in British Columbia, Canada as a case study. Land use data and dispersal characteristics for the western tiger salamander were used to develop a spatially-explicit individual-based model of amphibian movement. The model was configured to explore connectivity under three climate scenarios (a wet, average, and dry year), and a land management scenario in which only known breeding sites are conserved. We used a spatial network analysis to identify key ephemeral wetlands that connect otherwise isolated sub-networks across the landscape and probable movement paths between wetlands and the upland terrestrial habitat. Our results illustrate the importance of conserving ephemeral wetlands as stepping stones. We argue that a landscape approach to wetland conservation, rather than just conserving known breeding sites, is essential for retaining viable amphibian populations in a context of human induced habitat loss and climate change.

[1]  K. McGarigal,et al.  Orientation of Movements and Habitat Selection in a Spatially Structured Population of Marbled Salamanders (Ambystoma opacum) , 2006 .

[2]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure , 1993 .

[3]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  Spatial network structure and amphibian persistence in stochastic environments , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  L. Fahrig How much habitat is enough , 2001 .

[5]  Luc Lens,et al.  The importance of realistic dispersal models in conservation planning: application of a novel modelling platform to evaluate management scenarios in an Afrotropical biodiversity hotspot , 2016, The Journal of applied ecology.

[6]  David A. Haukos,et al.  A network model framework for prioritizing wetland conservation in the Great Plains , 2016, Landscape Ecology.

[7]  M. Araújo,et al.  Additive threats from pathogens, climate and land-use change for global amphibian diversity , 2011, Nature.

[8]  Samuel A. Cushman,et al.  Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: A review and prospectus , 2006 .

[9]  M. J. Adams,et al.  Amphibians in the climate vise: loss and restoration of resilience of montane wetland ecosystems in the western US , 2014 .

[10]  M. Fortin,et al.  EDITOR'S CHOICE: Stepping stones are crucial for species' long‐distance dispersal and range expansion through habitat networks , 2014 .

[11]  R. D. Semlitsch,et al.  Assessing modularity in genetic networks to manage spatially structured metapopulations , 2016 .

[12]  Nancy E. McIntyre,et al.  Graph theory as an invasive species management tool: case study in the Sonoran Desert , 2017, Landscape Ecology.

[13]  C. Scott Findlay,et al.  Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines , 2000, Nature.

[14]  Dean L Urban,et al.  Graph theory as a proxy for spatially explicit population models in conservation planning. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[15]  R. Baldwin,et al.  Conservation Planning for Amphibian Species with Complex Habitat Requirements: A Case Study Using Movements and Habitat Selection of the Wood Frog Rana Sylvatica , 2006 .

[16]  J. Maerz,et al.  Integrating Ecophysiological and Agent-Based Models to Simulate How Behavior Moderates Salamander Sensitivity to Climate , 2019, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[17]  E. Werner,et al.  Turnover in an amphibian metacommunity : the role of local and regional factors , 2007 .

[18]  R. D. Semlitsch,et al.  Habitat type and distance to edge affect movement behavior of juvenile pond‐breeding salamanders , 2013 .

[19]  L. Parrott,et al.  Modeling cross-scale relationships between climate, hydrology, and individual animals: generating scenarios for stream salamanders , 2015, Front. Environ. Sci..

[20]  M. Smith,et al.  Dispersal and the metapopulation paradigm in amphibian ecology and conservation : are all amphibian populations metapopulations? , 2005 .

[21]  B. B. Rothermel,et al.  MIGRATORY SUCCESS OF JUVENILES: A POTENTIAL CONSTRAINT ON CONNECTIVITY FOR POND‐BREEDING AMPHIBIANS , 2004 .

[22]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis , 2007 .

[23]  D. Marsh,et al.  Metapopulation Dynamics and Amphibian Conservation , 2001 .

[24]  R. M’Closkey,et al.  Regional Dynamics and the Status of Amphibians , 1996 .

[25]  L. Fahrig,et al.  On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity , 2000 .

[26]  S. Swallow,et al.  Are wetland regulations cost effective for species protection? A case study of amphibian metapopulations. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[27]  H. B. Shaffer,et al.  Microhabitat use and migration distance of an endangered grassland amphibian , 2013 .

[28]  J. Gareth Polhill,et al.  The ODD protocol: A review and first update , 2010, Ecological Modelling.

[29]  E. Zavaleta,et al.  Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendations , 2009 .

[30]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Centrality in Social Networks , 1993 .

[31]  Greta Bocedi,et al.  RangeShifter: a platform for modelling spatial eco‐evolutionary dynamics and species' responses to environmental changes , 2014 .

[32]  Aurélie Coulon,et al.  Introducing a ‘stochastic movement simulator’ for estimating habitat connectivity , 2011 .

[33]  R. C. Thomson,et al.  The origin of tiger salamander (Ambystoma tigrinum) populations in California, Oregon, and Nevada: introductions or relicts? , 2011, Conservation Genetics.

[34]  D. Legrand,et al.  Individual dispersal, landscape connectivity and ecological networks , 2013, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[35]  Raymond D. Semlitsch,et al.  Biological Criteria for Buffer Zones around Wetlands and Riparian Habitats for Amphibians and Reptiles , 2003 .

[36]  I. Hanski,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics: Does it help to have more of the same? , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[37]  Neftalí Sillero,et al.  The pond network: can structural connectivity reflect on (amphibian) biodiversity patterns? , 2011, Landscape Ecology.

[38]  Zhiming Zhang,et al.  Implementation of Diversified Ecological Networks to Strengthen Wetland Conservation , 2012 .

[39]  V Latora,et al.  Efficient behavior of small-world networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[40]  C. Haddad,et al.  Habitat Split and the Global Decline of Amphibians , 2007, Science.

[41]  D. E. Gill The Metapopulation Ecology of the Red‐Spotted Newt, Notophthalmus viridescens (Rafinesque) , 1978 .

[42]  K. McGarigal,et al.  Emigration Orientation Of Juvenile Pond-breeding Amphibians In Western Massachusetts , 2007, Copeia.

[43]  C. Fonseca,et al.  Habitat Split as a Cause of Local Population Declines of Amphibians with Aquatic Larvae , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[44]  I. Hanski Metapopulation dynamics , 1998, Nature.

[45]  Kerry L. Griffis-Kyle,et al.  Using nested connectivity models to resolve management conflicts of isolated water networks in the Sonoran Desert , 2017 .

[46]  P. Trenham Terrestrial Habitat Use by Adult California Tiger Salamanders , 2001 .

[47]  Emilio Padoa-Schioppa,et al.  Influence of Landscape Elements in Riparian Buffers on the Conservation of Semiaquatic Amphibians , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[48]  Thorsten Wiegand,et al.  Using individual-based movement models to assess inter-patch connectivity for large carnivores in fragmented landscapes , 2013 .

[49]  Timothy H. Keitt,et al.  LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY: A GRAPH‐THEORETIC PERSPECTIVE , 2001 .

[50]  A. Georges,et al.  Heterogeneous wetland complexes, buffer zones, and travel corridors: Landscape management for freshwater reptiles , 2007 .

[51]  R. D. Semlitsch,et al.  Movement ecology of amphibians: A missing component for understanding population declines , 2014 .

[52]  Michael J. North,et al.  Complex adaptive systems modeling with Repast Simphony , 2013, Complex Adapt. Syst. Model..

[53]  Peter C. Trenham,et al.  REGIONAL DYNAMICS OF WETLAND‐BREEDING FROGS AND TOADS: TURNOVER AND SYNCHRONY , 2003 .

[54]  Raymond D. Semlitsch,et al.  Differentiating Migration and Dispersal Processes for Pond-Breeding Amphibians , 2008 .

[55]  I. Creed,et al.  Connectivity among wetlands matters for vulnerable amphibian populations in wetlandscapes , 2018, Ecological Modelling.

[56]  M. Tulbure,et al.  Surface water network structure, landscape resistance to movement and flooding vital for maintaining ecological connectivity across Australia’s largest river basin , 2015, Landscape Ecology.

[57]  Karin Frank,et al.  Breaking Functional Connectivity into Components: A Novel Approach Using an Individual-Based Model, and First Outcomes , 2011, PloS one.

[58]  R. D. Semlitsch Principles for Management of Aquatic-Breeding Amphibians , 2000 .

[59]  Kerry L. Griffis-Kyle,et al.  A connectivity and wildlife management conflict in isolated desert waters , 2016 .

[60]  D. V. Vuren,et al.  Habitat Use and Migration Behavior of the California Tiger Salamander , 1996 .

[61]  Ulla Mörtberg,et al.  Making graph theory operational for landscape ecological assessments, planning, and design , 2010 .

[62]  R. Hobbs,et al.  A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[63]  Mark Broich,et al.  Evaluating static and dynamic landscape connectivity modelling using a 25-year remote sensing time series , 2018, Landscape Ecology.

[64]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[65]  H. B. Shaffer,et al.  AMPHIBIAN UPLAND HABITAT USE AND ITS CONSEQUENCES FOR POPULATION VIABILITY , 2005 .

[66]  Todd R. Lookingbill,et al.  Combining a dispersal model with network theory to assess habitat connectivity. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[67]  Luc Lens,et al.  Simple individual‐based models effectively represent Afrotropical forest bird movement in complex landscapes , 2014 .

[68]  R. D. Semlitsch Burrowing ability and behavior of salamanders of the genus Ambystoma , 1983 .

[69]  Mark Broich,et al.  Surface-water dynamics and land use influence landscape connectivity across a major dryland region. , 2017, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[70]  Leroy J. Walston,et al.  Variation in amount of surrounding forest habitat influences the initial orientation of juvenile amphibians emigrating from breeding ponds , 2008 .