The Color of Choice: The Influence of Presenting Product Information in Color on the Compromise Effect

Consumers often find themselves challenged by the conflicting desires to seek uniqueness versus conformity, and thus seek some degree of balance. In a series of six studies we show that presenting each options’ product-related information in a unique color, as opposed to all product-related information presented in black-on-white, partially satiates the desire for uniqueness, thus amplifying the compromise effect. Consumers facing color presentation formats choose the middle, conforming option more often, yet perceive their choice as more unique. This color effect is not realized if each option's attributes are presented in different colors, but all options use a consistent color scheme, as is often the case in on-line retailing sites such as Amazon.com. Having to justify one's choice moderates the color effect. The practical take-away is that consumers’ choices can be influenced by using unique colors to present option-related product information, a variable that is entirely independent of the options’ performance characteristics. Two field studies confirm this finding, one using a plain background versus a colored background in a product display and the other using product containers that are either in plain white or wrapped in unique colors.

[1]  A. Kalra,et al.  When Trade-Offs Matter: The Effect of Choice Construal on Context Effects , 2011 .

[2]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[3]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  The Role of Explanations and Need for Uniqueness in Consumer Decision Making: Unconventional Choices Based on Reasons , 2000 .

[4]  A. Drolet.  Inherent rule variability in consumer choice: Changing rules for change's sake , 2002 .

[5]  R. E. Burnkrant,et al.  Informational and Normative Social Influence in Buyer Behavior , 1975 .

[6]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  Social influence: compliance and conformity. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[7]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[8]  Jolanda Jetten,et al.  The Individual Within the Group: Balancing the Need to Belong With the Need to Be Different , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[9]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Goals as Excuses or Guides: The Liberating Effect of Perceived Goal Progress on Choice , 2005 .

[10]  Mario Pandelaere,et al.  When colors backfire: The impact of color cues on moral judgment , 2013 .

[11]  Chris Janiszewski,et al.  Behavioral Consistency and Inconsistency in the Resolution of Goal Conflict , 2009 .

[12]  Ayalla Ruvio,et al.  Unique like everybody else? The dual role of consumers' need for uniqueness , 2008 .

[13]  G. Zinkhan,et al.  Consumer Conformity: Review and Applications for Marketing Theory and Practice , 1999 .

[14]  M. Venkatesan,et al.  Experimental Study of Consumer Behavior Conformity and Independence , 1966 .

[15]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. , 1977 .

[16]  Markus A. Maier,et al.  Color and psychological functioning: the effect of red on performance attainment. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  Jungkeun Kim,et al.  The influence of hedonic versus utilitarian consumption situations on the compromise effect , 2016 .

[18]  Darron M. Billeter,et al.  Consumer Behavior in “Equilibrium”: How Experiencing Physical Balance Increases Compromise Choice , 2013 .

[19]  Ginger Rosenkrans,et al.  The Creativeness and Effectiveness of Online Interactive Rich Media Advertising , 2009 .

[20]  Chad R. Mortensen,et al.  Going along versus going alone: when fundamental motives facilitate strategic (non)conformity. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Constructive Consumer Choice Processes , 1998 .

[22]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  Sales Promotions and the Choice Context as Competing Influences on Consumer Decision Making , 2000 .

[23]  N. Schwarz.  Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making , 2004 .

[24]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion , 1992 .

[25]  R. Dhar,et al.  The Effect of Forced Choice on Choice , 2003 .

[26]  M. Zeelenberg,et al.  When Less Sells More or Less: The Scarcity Principle in Wine Choice , 2014 .

[27]  Joseph A. Bellizzi,et al.  Environmental color, consumer feelings, and purchase likelihood , 1992 .

[28]  Heribert Gierl,et al.  Are scarce products always more attractive? The interaction of different types of scarcity signals with products' suitability for conspicuous consumption , 2010 .

[29]  Amar Cheema,et al.  The Effect of Red Background Color on Willingness-to-Pay: The Moderating Role of Selling Mechanism , 2013 .

[30]  A. Drolet,et al.  Choice and self-expression: a cultural analysis of variety-seeking. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  Dhruv Grewal,et al.  Are Men Seduced by Red? The Effect of Red Versus Black Prices on Price Perceptions. , 2013 .

[32]  G. Kress,et al.  Colour as a semiotic mode: notes for a grammar of colour , 2002 .

[33]  Xiaoyan Deng,et al.  Monochrome Forests and Colorful Trees: The Effect of Black-and-White versus Color Imagery on Construal Level , 2014 .

[34]  Kelly Tepper Tian,et al.  Consumers' Need for Uniqueness: Scale Development and Validation , 2001 .

[35]  R. Dhar,et al.  Preference Fluency in Choice , 2007 .

[36]  Itamar Simonson,et al.  Multiple Routes to Self- versus Other-Expression in Consumer Choice , 2011 .

[37]  Jungkeun Kim.  The influence of graphical versus numerical information representation modes on the compromise effect , 2017 .

[38]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[39]  C. Heath,et al.  Where Consumers Diverge from Others: Identity Signaling and Product Domains , 2007 .

[40]  Leaf Van Boven,et al.  Identifiable but Not Identical: Combining Social Identity and Uniqueness Motives in Choice , 2012 .

[41]  Alexander Chernev,et al.  Extremeness Aversion and Attribute-Balance Effects in Choice , 2004 .

[42]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Trying Hard or Hardly Trying: An Analysis of Context Effects in Choice , 2000 .

[43]  U. Böckenholt,et al.  Compromise and Attraction Effects under Prevention and Promotion Motivations , 2007 .

[44]  Haluk Ogmen,et al.  Unconscious priming by color and form: Different processes and levels , 2004, Consciousness and Cognition.

[45]  Michel Wedel,et al.  The Buffer Effect: The Role of Color When Advertising Exposures Are Brief and Blurred , 2015, Mark. Sci..

[46]  Lauren I. Labrecque,et al.  Exciting red and competent blue: the importance of color in marketing , 2012 .

[47]  M. Brewer.  The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time , 1991 .

[48]  P. Nail.  Toward an integration of some models and theories of social response , 1986 .

[49]  R. Thaler,et al.  Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness , 2008 .

[50]  S. Frederick,et al.  The Limits of Attraction , 2014 .

[51]  E. Thorson,et al.  The Effects of Progressive Levels of Interactivity and Vividness in Web Marketing Sites , 2001 .

[52]  Laura A. Peracchio,et al.  Understanding the Effects of Color: How the Correspondence between Available and Required Resources Affects Attitudes , 1995 .