Do Light Truck Vehicles (LTV) Impose Greater Risk of Pedestrian Injury Than Passenger Cars? A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

Objective: Pedestrian crashes present a growing challenge for public health trauma and road safety researchers around the world. They are associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and cost, yet there is an international lack of published work on the topic, especially when compared with vehicle occupant safety studies. Our review attempts to quantify the risk of fatal injury among vulnerable road users. The specific objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to quantify and compare the impact of light truck vehicles (LTVs) versus conventional cars on pedestrian fatal injury. Methods: A protocol was developed using methods of the Cochrane Collaboration. We conducted a search for the studies in bibliographic databases that included ATI (Australian Transport Index); Cochrane Injuries Group Specialized Register; EMBASE; ERIC; MEDLINE; National Research Register; PsycINFO; Road Res (ARRB); SIGLE; Science (and Social Science) Citation Index; TRANSPORT (NTIS, TRIS, TRANSDOC, IRRD). Web sites of traffic and road accident research bodies, government agencies, and injury prevention organizations were searched for grey literature. Reference lists from selected papers or topic reviews were scanned for potentially relevant papers. Results: Our initial search identified 878 potentially eligible studies. After thorough review by three of the researchers a total of 12 studies were included in the systematic review, 11 of which were included in the meta-analysis. The overall pooled odds ratio for the risk of fatal injury in pedestrian collisions with LTVs compared to conventional cars was odds ratio 1.54, 95 percent confidence interval 1.15–1.93, p = 0.001. Thus, the risk for pedestrians of sustaining fatal injury is 50 percent greater in collisions with LTVs than in collisions with conventional cars. Conclusions: Our systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that LTVs pose a greater risk of pedestrian injury death compared to conventional cars. These findings have important implications for the automotive industry and the safety of vulnerable road users.

[1]  I. Pike,et al.  Smoking inside vehicles should be banned globally. , 2009, American journal of public health.

[2]  Charles DiMaggio,et al.  The association of light trucks and vans with paediatric pedestrian deaths , 2006, International journal of injury control and safety promotion.

[3]  Ted Mitchell Risks on the roads , 2006, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[4]  Ciaran K Simms,et al.  Car size and injury risk: a model for injury risk in frontal collisions. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  C. DiGuiseppi,et al.  Determinants of car travel on daily journeys to school: cross sectional survey of primary school children , 1998, BMJ.

[6]  Abdulbari Bener,et al.  The impact of four-wheel drives on traffic disability and deaths compared to passenger cars. , 2006, Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP.

[7]  F P Rivara,et al.  Vehicle mismatch: injury patterns and severity. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  L. Dijkstra,et al.  Promoting safe walking and cycling to improve public health: lessons from The Netherlands and Germany. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[9]  Patricia C Dischinger,et al.  Pedestrian injuries and vehicle type in Maryland, 1995-1999. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  M. Gardner,et al.  Driveway injuries in children: risk factors, morbidity, and mortality. , 2001, Pediatrics.

[11]  Dimitri Margaritis,et al.  An analysis of sport utility vehicles involved in road accidents , 2005 .

[12]  Masayoshi Okamoto,et al.  Influence of Age-Related Stature on the Frequency of Body Region Injury and Overall Injury Severity in Child Pedestrian Casualties , 2006, Traffic injury prevention.

[13]  I. Olkin,et al.  Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting , 2000 .

[14]  Michael Anderson,et al.  Safety for whom? The effects of light trucks on traffic fatalities. , 2008, Journal of health economics.

[15]  P F Agran,et al.  Differences in child pedestrian injury events by location. , 1994, Pediatrics.

[16]  D. Mohan Road safety in less-motorized environments: future concerns. , 2002, International journal of epidemiology.

[17]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study , 1997, The Lancet.

[18]  Margaret M. Peden,et al.  World Report on Road Traffic Injury Prevention , 2004 .

[19]  Jikuang Yang,et al.  Head Injuries in Child Pedestrian Accidents—In-Depth Case Analysis and Reconstructions , 2007, Traffic injury prevention.

[20]  Hampton C Gabler,et al.  The fatality and injury risk of light truck impacts with pedestrians in the United States. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  K Mizuno,et al.  Compatibility problems in frontal, side, single car collisions and car-to-pedestrian accidents in Japan. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  Yutaka Okamoto,et al.  Pedestrian Head Impact Conditions Depending on the Vehicle Front Shape and Its Construction--Full Model Simulation , 2003, Traffic injury prevention.

[23]  N Clay Mann,et al.  Risk of Pediatric Back-over Injuries in Residential Driveways by Vehicle Type , 2006, Pediatric emergency care.

[24]  B S Roudsari,et al.  Pedestrian crashes: higher injury severity and mortality rate for light truck vehicles compared with passenger vehicles , 2004, Injury Prevention.

[25]  J. Berlin,et al.  Invited commentary: benefits of heterogeneity in meta-analysis of data from epidemiologic studies. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.

[26]  I. Roberts,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of site specific advice on school travel patterns , 2003, Archives of disease in childhood.

[27]  Massimiliano Avalle,et al.  Improvements to the protection of vulnerable road users: Retrofittable, energy-absorbing front end for heavy goods vehicles , 2008 .

[28]  L. Paulozzi,et al.  United States pedestrian fatality rates by vehicle type , 2005, Injury Prevention.

[29]  Sports utility vehicles and vulnerable road users. , 2007, American journal of public health.

[30]  A. Bavdekar,et al.  IAP National Task Force for Childhood Prevention of Adult Diseases: Childhood Obesity. , 2004, Indian pediatrics.

[31]  S. J. Ashton,et al.  INFLUENCE OF VEHICLE DESIGN ON PEDESTRIAN LEG INJURIES , 1978 .

[32]  D. Cass,et al.  Driveway motor vehicle injuries in children , 2000, The Medical journal of Australia.

[33]  Frederick P Rivara,et al.  The relationship between body weight and risk of death and serious injury in motor vehicle crashes. , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[34]  Jason R. Kerrigan,et al.  Kinematic comparison of the Polar-II and PMHS in pedestrian impact tests with a sport-utility vehicle , 2005 .

[35]  Michal Krzyzanowski,et al.  Development of Air Pollution and Respiratory Diseases Indicators to Monitor Implementation of Children??s Environment and Health Action Plan for Europe , 2006 .

[36]  M. White,et al.  The “Arms Race” on American Roads: The Effect of Sport Utility Vehicles and Pickup Trucks on Traffic Safety* , 2004, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[37]  Ian Pike,et al.  THE RISK OF INJURY AND VEHICLE DAMAGE SEVERITY IN VEHICLE MISMATCHED SIDE IMPACT CRASHES IN BRITISH COLUMBIA , 2005 .

[38]  E S Nowak,et al.  Pedestrians in real world collisions. , 1994, The Journal of trauma.

[39]  Darin Evans,et al.  Engineering Thermoplastic Energy Absorbers for Bumpers , 1999 .

[40]  K. Takahashi,et al.  Compatibility between sports-utility vehicles and sedan-type vehicles , 2008 .

[41]  Ian Pike,et al.  Sports utility vehicles and older pedestrians , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[42]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: Global Burden of Disease Study , 1997, The Lancet.

[43]  Kavi Bhalla,et al.  Child and adult pedestrian impact: the influence of vehicle type on injury severity. , 2003, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[44]  Ediriweera Desapriya,et al.  The risk of injury and vehicle damage in vehicle mismatched crashes , 2005, International journal of injury control and safety promotion.

[45]  Stewart C. Wang,et al.  Pelvic ring fractures: implications of vehicle design, crash type, and occupant characteristics. , 2004, Surgery.

[46]  Yasuhiro Matsui Evaluation of Pedestrian Subsystem Test Method Using Legform and Upper Legform Impactors for Assessment of High-Bumper Vehicle Aggressiveness , 2004, Traffic injury prevention.

[47]  J. Crandall,et al.  Designing road vehicles for pedestrian protection , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[48]  Kay Dickersin,et al.  Systematic reviews in epidemiology: why are we so far behind? , 2002, International journal of epidemiology.

[49]  C Mock,et al.  Determinants of disability after lower extremity fracture. , 2000, The Journal of trauma.

[50]  E. Krug,et al.  The global burden of injuries. , 2000, American journal of public health.

[51]  S. Carlson,et al.  Barriers to children walking to or from school--United States, 2004. , 2005, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[52]  E Desapriya,et al.  Severity of alcohol-related motor vehicle crashes in British Columbia: case – control study , 2006, International journal of injury control and safety promotion.

[53]  N. Yoganandan,et al.  Facial fractures in motor vehicle collisions: epidemiological trends and risk factors. , 2009, Archives of facial plastic surgery.

[54]  Yasuhiro Matsui Effects of vehicle bumper height and impact velocity on type of lower extremity injury in vehicle-pedestrian accidents. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[55]  Ian Roberts,et al.  Walking, Cycling and Transport Safety: An Analysis of Child Road Deaths , 2006, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[56]  Poison Prevention,et al.  Pedestrian Safety , 2009, Pediatrics.