Identification of biomolecule mass transport and binding rate parameters in living cells by inverse modeling

BackgroundQuantification of in-vivo biomolecule mass transport and reaction rate parameters from experimental data obtained by Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching (FRAP) is becoming more important.Methods and resultsThe Osborne-Moré extended version of the Levenberg-Marquardt optimization algorithm was coupled with the experimental data obtained by the Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching (FRAP) protocol, and the numerical solution of a set of two partial differential equations governing macromolecule mass transport and reaction in living cells, to inversely estimate optimized values of the molecular diffusion coefficient and binding rate parameters of GFP-tagged glucocorticoid receptor. The results indicate that the FRAP protocol provides enough information to estimate one parameter uniquely using a nonlinear optimization technique. Coupling FRAP experimental data with the inverse modeling strategy, one can also uniquely estimate the individual values of the binding rate coefficients if the molecular diffusion coefficient is known. One can also simultaneously estimate the dissociation rate parameter and molecular diffusion coefficient given the pseudo-association rate parameter is known. However, the protocol provides insufficient information for unique simultaneous estimation of three parameters (diffusion coefficient and binding rate parameters) owing to the high intercorrelation between the molecular diffusion coefficient and pseudo-association rate parameter. Attempts to estimate macromolecule mass transport and binding rate parameters simultaneously from FRAP data result in misleading conclusions regarding concentrations of free macromolecule and bound complex inside the cell, average binding time per vacant site, average time for diffusion of macromolecules from one site to the next, and slow or rapid mobility of biomolecules in cells.ConclusionTo obtain unique values for molecular diffusion coefficient and binding rate parameters from FRAP data, we propose conducting two FRAP experiments on the same class of macromolecule and cell. One experiment should be used to measure the molecular diffusion coefficient independently of binding in an effective diffusion regime and the other should be conducted in a reaction dominant or reaction-diffusion regime to quantify binding rate parameters. The method described in this paper is likely to be widely used to estimate in-vivo biomolecule mass transport and binding rate parameters.

[1]  J. W. Gorman,et al.  Fitting Equations to Data. , 1973 .

[2]  D. Odde,et al.  Rapid dynamics of the microtubule binding of ensconsin in vivo. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[3]  P. Sabatier,et al.  Past and future of inverse problems , 2000 .

[4]  Jan Ellenberg,et al.  Dissecting the contribution of diffusion and interactions to the mobility of nuclear proteins. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[5]  Hendrikus J Dubbink,et al.  The androgen receptor ligand-binding domain stabilizes DNA binding in living cells. , 2004, Journal of structural biology.

[6]  T. Meyvis,et al.  Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching: A Versatile Tool for Mobility and Interaction Measurements in Pharmaceutical Research , 1999, Pharmaceutical Research.

[7]  M Edidin,et al.  Measurement of membrane protein lateral diffusion in single cells. , 2003, Science.

[8]  J H Hartwig,et al.  Interpreting photoactivated fluorescence microscopy measurements of steady-state actin dynamics. , 1995, Biophysical journal.

[9]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations , 1983 .

[10]  Jorge J. Moré,et al.  The Levenberg-Marquardt algo-rithm: Implementation and theory , 1977 .

[11]  Gustavo Carrero,et al.  Using FRAP and mathematical modeling to determine the in vivo kinetics of nuclear proteins. , 2003, Methods.

[12]  M. Bretscher,et al.  Mammalian plasma membranes , 1975, Nature.

[13]  Renato Baserga,et al.  Control of proliferation in animal cells , 1974 .

[14]  Kouroush Sadegh Zadeh MULTI-SCALE INVERSE MODELING IN BIOLOGICAL MASS TRANSPORT PROCESSES , 2006 .

[15]  T. Tsay,et al.  Spatial Fourier analysis of video photobleaching measurements. Principles and optimization. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[16]  W. Webb,et al.  Lateral transport on cell membranes: mobility of concanavalin A receptors on myoblasts. , 1976, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Eberhard O Voit,et al.  Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling Identification of Metabolic System Parameters Using Global Optimization Methods , 2022 .

[18]  Mu-ming Poo,et al.  Lateral diffusion of rhodopsin in the photoreceptor membrane , 1974, Nature.

[19]  H. Bateman Partial Differential Equations of Mathematical Physics , 1932 .

[20]  Feike J. Leij,et al.  The RETC code for quantifying the hydraulic functions of unsaturated soils , 1992 .

[21]  R. Pego,et al.  Analysis of binding reactions by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[22]  M Edidin,et al.  Rotational and translational diffusion in membranes. , 1974, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[23]  G. Entine,et al.  Lateral Diffusion of Visual Pigment in Photoreceptor Disk Membranes , 1974, Science.

[24]  G M Edelman,et al.  Restriction of the mobility of lymphocyte immunoglobulin receptors by concanavalin A. , 1972, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  R K Jain,et al.  Quantification of transport and binding parameters using fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Potential for in vivo applications. , 1990, Biophysical journal.

[26]  R K Jain,et al.  Direct in vivo measurement of targeted binding in a human tumor xenograft. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  T. Misteli,et al.  A Kinetic Framework for a Mammalian RNA Polymerase in Vivo , 2002, Science.

[28]  L. Rosenhead Conduction of Heat in Solids , 1947, Nature.

[29]  Guy Chavent On the theory and practice of non-linear least-squares , 1991 .

[30]  T. Misteli,et al.  High mobility of proteins in the mammalian cell nucleus , 2000, Nature.

[31]  M. R. Osborne Nonlinear least squares — the Levenberg algorithm revisited , 1976, The Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society. Series B. Applied Mathematics.

[32]  J. Ellenberg,et al.  Mapping the dynamic organization of the nuclear pore complex inside single living cells , 2004, Nature Cell Biology.

[33]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[34]  O. Berg,et al.  Effective diffusion rate through a polymer network: Influence of nonspecific binding and intersegment transfer , 1986, Biopolymers.

[35]  W. Webb,et al.  Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. , 1976, Biophysical journal.

[36]  J. McNally,et al.  The glucocorticoid receptor: rapid exchange with regulatory sites in living cells. , 2000, Science.

[37]  Sylvie Coscoy,et al.  Molecular analysis of microscopic ezrin dynamics by two-photon FRAP , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  T. Brubaker,et al.  Nonlinear Parameter Estimation , 1979 .

[39]  Hiroshi Kimura,et al.  The transcription cycle of RNA polymerase II in living cells , 2002, The Journal of cell biology.

[40]  W. D. Evans,et al.  PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS , 1941 .

[41]  N. Thompson,et al.  Measuring surface dynamics of biomolecules by total internal reflection fluorescence with photobleaching recovery or correlation spectroscopy. , 1981, Biophysical journal.

[42]  Kenneth Levenberg A METHOD FOR THE SOLUTION OF CERTAIN NON – LINEAR PROBLEMS IN LEAST SQUARES , 1944 .