Cryoballoon Ablation as Initial Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND In patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation that has not responded to medication, catheter ablation is more effective than antiarrhythmic drug therapy for maintaining sinus rhythm. However, the safety and efficacy of cryoballoon ablation as initial first-line therapy have not been established. METHODS We performed a multicenter trial in which patients 18 to 80 years of age who had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation for which they had not previously received rhythm-control therapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs (class I or III agents) or pulmonary vein isolation with a cryoballoon. Arrhythmia monitoring included 12-lead electrocardiography conducted at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months; patient-activated telephone monitoring conducted weekly and when symptoms were present during months 3 through 12; and 24-hour ambulatory monitoring conducted at 6 and 12 months. The primary efficacy end point was treatment success (defined as freedom from initial failure of the procedure or atrial arrhythmia recurrence after a 90-day blanking period to allow recovery from the procedure or drug dose adjustment, evaluated in a Kaplan-Meier analysis). The primary safety end point was assessed in the ablation group only and was a composite of several procedure-related and cryoballoon system-related serious adverse events. RESULTS Of the 203 participants who underwent randomization and received treatment, 104 underwent ablation, and 99 initially received drug therapy. In the ablation group, initial success of the procedure was achieved in 97% of patients. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients with treatment success at 12 months was 74.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.0 to 82.0) in the ablation group and 45.0% (95% CI, 34.6 to 54.7) in the drug-therapy group (P<0.001 by log-rank test). Two primary safety end-point events occurred in the ablation group (Kaplan-Meier estimate of the percentage of patients with an event within 12 months, 1.9%; 95% CI, 0.5 to 7.5). CONCLUSIONS Cryoballoon ablation as initial therapy was superior to drug therapy for the prevention of atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Serious procedure-related adverse events were uncommon. (Supported by Medtronic; STOP AF First ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03118518.).

[1]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Early Rhythm-Control Therapy in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). , 2020, European heart journal.

[3]  D. Mark,et al.  Diagnosis-to-Ablation Time and Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation Following Catheter Ablation , 2020, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[4]  Takeshi Kimura,et al.  Early choice for catheter ablation reduced readmission in management of atrial fibrillation: Impact of diagnosis-to-ablation time. , 2019, International journal of cardiology.

[5]  J. Brachmann,et al.  Outcomes of cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation in symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation , 2019, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[6]  R. Ruiz-Granell,et al.  Diagnosis‐to‐ablation time in atrial fibrillation: A modifiable factor relevant to clinical outcome , 2019, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[7]  G. Hindricks,et al.  Effect of Catheter Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy on Mortality, Stroke, Bleeding, and Cardiac Arrest Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The CABANA Randomized Clinical Trial , 2019, JAMA.

[8]  M. Mansour,et al.  Long-Term Outcomes After Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Using the Second-Generation Cryoballoon: Final Results From STOP AF Post-Approval Study. , 2019, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology.

[9]  C. Blomström-Lundqvist,et al.  A decade of catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias in Sweden: ablation practices and outcomes , 2018, European heart journal.

[10]  C. Hamm,et al.  Second-generation cryoballoon ablation as a first-line treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation: Two-year outcome and predictors of recurrence after a single procedure. , 2018, International journal of cardiology.

[11]  C. Torp-Pedersen,et al.  Temporal trends in atrial fibrillation recurrence rates after ablation between 2005 and 2014: a nationwide Danish cohort study , 2018, European heart journal.

[12]  M. Chung,et al.  2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation , 2017, Heart rhythm.

[13]  S. Pocock,et al.  Cryoballoon or Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  K. Kuck,et al.  First-line catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: outcome of radiofrequency vs. cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation. , 2016, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[15]  David O. Martin,et al.  Radiofrequency Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Diagnosis-to-Ablation Time, Markers of Pathways of Atrial Remodeling, and Outcomes , 2016, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[16]  J. Healey,et al.  A Systematic Review on the Progression of Paroxysmal to Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Shedding New Light on the Effects of Catheter Ablation. , 2015, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology.

[17]  F. Biancari,et al.  Radiofrequency ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drug therapy as first line treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation: systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[18]  M. Ezekowitz,et al.  2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. , 2014, Circulation.

[19]  B. Grubb,et al.  Catheter Ablation and Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy as First- or Second-Line Therapy in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2014, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[20]  J. Healey,et al.  Radiofrequency ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs as first-line treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (RAAFT-2): a randomized trial. , 2014, JAMA.

[21]  H. May,et al.  Increasing time between first diagnosis of atrial fibrillation and catheter ablation adversely affects long-term outcomes. , 2013, Heart rhythm.

[22]  P. Brugada,et al.  Isolating the pulmonary veins as first-line therapy in patients with lone paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using the cryoballoon. , 2012, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[23]  Mandeep Bhargava,et al.  Radiofrequency ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs as first-line treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial. , 2005, JAMA.

[24]  A. Glanz,et al.  Radiofrequency ablation as initial therapy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  S. Mouly,et al.  Antiarrhythmics for maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.