The Effects of Peer-Interaction Styles in Team Blogs on Students' Cognitive Thinking and Blog Participation

Deep cognitive thinking refers to a learner's purposeful and conscious manipulation of ideas toward meaningful learning. Strategies such as journaling/blogging and peer feedback have been found to promote deep thinking. This article reports a research study about the effects of two different blog leader styles on students' deep thinking as exhibited on blogs. Thirty-four students in two sections of a class were assigned in three to five member groups and blogged for 10 weeks. In the first section, the “starters” of each week's blog introduced articles with two alternative views about a current topic, posted a few questions, and the rest of the group responded to the questions. In contrast, the “starters” in the second section wrote a post and the rest of the team commented on the post. Data analyses revealed that different starter styles influenced both the quantity and quality of starters' posts as well as peer feedback.

[1]  Julie Dickinson,et al.  Tutor Messaging and Its Effectiveness in Encouraging Student Participation on Computer Conferences , 2008 .

[2]  Russel S. Hathaway,et al.  Computer Conferencing, Critical Reflection, and Teacher Development , 1994 .

[3]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive processing? , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  Tatsuya Kameda,et al.  Social dilemmas, subgroups, and motivation loss in task-oriented groups : in search of an «optimal» team size in division of work , 1992 .

[5]  Fengfeng Ke,et al.  Online discussion design on adult students' learning perceptions and patterns of online interactions , 2009, CSCL.

[6]  M. Cole,et al.  Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. L. S. Vygotsky. , 1978 .

[7]  Ming Ming Chiu,et al.  Online Discussion Processes: Effects of Earlier Messages' Evaluations, Knowledge Content, Social Cues and Personal Information on Later Messages , 2006, ICALT.

[8]  Jennifer Hayes,et al.  Ask and you will receive: how question type influences quantity and quality of online discussions , 2008, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[9]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Using Peer Teams to Lead Online Discussions , 2002 .

[10]  J. Edwards.  Genetic Epistemology , 1971 .

[11]  L. A. Hausman.  How we Think , 1921 .

[12]  Jae-Won Moon.  Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and Practice , 2005 .

[13]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Attracting student participation in asynchronous online discussions: A case study of peer facilitation , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Lynn Davie,et al.  Facilitating Reflection through Interactive Journal Writing in an Online Graduate Course: A Qualitative Study. , 1997 .

[15]  John A. Wagner,et al.  Shared influence and organizational behavior: A meta-analysis of situational variables expected to moderate participation-outcome relationships. , 1987 .

[16]  Charlotte N. Gunawardena,et al.  Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing , 1997 .

[17]  Fengfeng Ke,et al.  The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students' reflective learning processes , 2008, Internet High. Educ..

[18]  Insook Han,et al.  The Effects of Epistemic Belief and Discussion-Facilitating Strategy on Interaction and Satisfaction in Online Discussion , 2008 .

[19]  D. Boud.  Situating academic development in professional work: Using peer learning , 1999 .

[20]  Ming Ming Chiu,et al.  Online Discussion Processes: Effects of Earlier Messages’ Evaluations, Knowledge Content, Social Cues and Personal Information on Later Messages , 2006, Sixth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'06).

[21]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning creating and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools , 1998 .

[22]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course , 2000 .

[23]  Laurie Thomas,et al.  Learning conversations : the self-organised learning way to personal and organisational growth , 1991 .

[24]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[25]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  The analysis of negotiation of common ground in CSCL , 2007 .

[26]  Lorena F. Ruberg,et al.  Student Participation, Interaction, and Regulation in a Computer-Mediated Communication Environment: A Qualitative Study , 1996 .

[27]  K. Kitchener,et al.  Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series and Jossey-Bass Social and Behavioral Science Series. , 2009 .

[28]  Steve Wheeler,et al.  Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education , 2006, BMC medical education.

[29]  Sue A. Stickel,et al.  Knowing in Action: A First-Year Counselor's Process of Reflection. , 1994 .

[30]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  Blogging in the Classroom: A Preliminary Exploration of Student Attitudes and Impact on Comprehension , 2008 .

[31]  Barbara Wasson,et al.  Self-Regulated Learning and Open Writing. , 2006 .