Tribological behavior of Gampsocleis Gratiosa foot pad against vertical flat surfaces

Some tribological behavior between mature Gampsocleis gratiosa foot pads and vertical flats of different materials were studied in this work. stereomicroscope (SMS) and scanning electron microscope (SEM) were used to measure the morphology of the Gampsocleis gratiosa foot pads. An atomic force microscope (AFM) was used to measure the morphologies of the surfaces of glass and a wall doped with calcium carbonate material. The attaching behavior of Gampsocleis gratiosa feet on the two vertical surfaces was observed. The attaching force (perpendicular to the vertical surface) and the static frictional force (along the direction of gravitation) of Gampsocleis gratiosa foot pads on a vertical glass were measured. It was shown that the average attaching force is 50. 59 mN and the static frictional force is 259. 10 mN. The physical models of the attaching interface between Gampsocleis gratiosa foot pads and the two vertical surfaces were proposed. It was observed that the foot pads are smooth in macroscale; however, the pad surface is composed by approximate hexagonal units with sizes of 3 μm to 7 μm in microscale; the adjacent units are separated by nanoscale grooves. The Observations showed that the Gampsocleis gratiosa can not climb the vertical calcium carbonate wall; in contrast, they can easily climb the vertical glass surface. Based on the features of the geometrical morphologies of the foot pads and the glass surface, we speculate that the attaching force and strong static frictional force are attributed to the inter-inlays between the deformable Gampsocleis gratiosa foot pads and the nanoscale sharp tips of the glass surface.

[1]  Stanislav N. Gorb,et al.  Surface profile and friction force generated by insects , 2004 .

[2]  S. Gorb,et al.  Roughness-dependent friction force of the tarsal claw system in the beetle Pachnoda marginata (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[3]  Zhiwu Han,et al.  Design Principles of the Non-smooth Surface of Bionic Plow Moldboard , 2004 .

[4]  A Study on Adhesive Properties of Materials Based on Biomimetic Results of Gecko’s Feet , 2004 .

[5]  Jianqiao Li,et al.  Restudies on Body Surface of Dung Beetle and Application of Its Bionics Flexible Technique , 2004 .

[6]  B. Persson,et al.  Adhesion between elastic bodies with randomly rough surfaces. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[7]  T. Aushev,et al.  Radiative B meson decays into Kπγ and Kππγ final states , 2002 .

[8]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Shape insensitive optimal adhesion of nanoscale fibrillar structures. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  J. B. Hull,et al.  The Concept of Electroosmotically Driven Flow and Its Application to Biomimetics , 2004 .

[10]  R. Full,et al.  Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair , 2000, Nature.

[11]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces , 1997, Planta.

[12]  Jin Tong,et al.  Soil Adhesion and Biomimetics of Soil-engaging Components: a Review , 2001 .

[13]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Effects of contact shape on the scaling of biological attachments , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[14]  Stanislav Gorb,et al.  Biological microtribology: anisotropy in frictional forces of orthopteran attachment pads reflects the ultrastructure of a highly deformable material , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  Li Jianqiao,et al.  Sliding resistance of plates with bionic bumpy surface against soil , 1900 .