Comparing energy technology alternatives from an environmental perspective

A number of individuals and organizations advocate the use of comparative, formal analysis to determine which are the safest methods for producing and using energy. Indeed, some have suggested that the findings of such analyses should be the basis upon which final decisions are made about whether to actually deploy energy technologies. Some of those who support formal comparative analysis are in a position to shape the policy debate on energy and environment. This paper presents an opposing viewpoint, arguing that for technical reasons, analysis can provide no definitive or rationally credible answers to the question of overall safety and, as a result of the deficiencies, comparative analysis cannot form the basis of a credible, viable energy policy. But, without formal comparative analysis, how can health, safety, and natural environment be protected. This paper briefly presents a technique for partially dealing with this problem. It is based upon work being developed to meet the Remedial Action Subcontractors and is further evidence of the success of the Phase I work. A summary of the Phase I costs are tabulated. A report is presented on the tasks performed.