A new bibliometric approach to measure knowledge transfer of internationally mobile scientists

This study introduces a new bibliometric approach to study the effects of international scientific mobility on knowledge transfer. It is based on an analysis of internationally mobile and non-internationally mobile German scientists publishing in journals that are indexed in Scopus. Using bibliometric data such co-authored articles, references and lexical abstract terms from the Scopus database, a method is presented that is based on cosine similarity to measure the similarity of the knowledge base of authors and their co-authors. This quantifiable method is capable of revealing potential knowledge transfer between internationally mobile scientists and different types of co-authors. In addition, the Shannon index is used as a diversity measure to analyse the knowledge base of scientists. Analyses are presented for an overall 9-year publication period (2007–2015), split into a pre-mobility phase, a mobility phase and a post-mobility phase, each of which lasts for 3 years. Internationally mobile scientists are compared with non-internationally mobile scientists and the potentials and limitations of the method presented are discussed. It is concluded that the bibliometric approach proposed is useful when applied on a large scale. International mobility proves to benefit the exchange of knowledge between scientists and various types of co-authors.

[1]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Lexical analysis of scientific publications for nano-level scientometrics , 2017, Scientometrics.

[2]  H. M. Collins,et al.  The TEA Set: Tacit Knowledge and Scientific Networks , 1974 .

[3]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[4]  Harold Maurice Collins,et al.  Tacit Knowledge, Trust and the Q of Sapphire , 2001 .

[5]  Jochen Gläser,et al.  Integrating Scientometric Indicators into Sociological Studies: Methodical and Methodological Problems , 2001, Scientometrics.

[6]  Michael McGill,et al.  Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval , 1983 .

[7]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Mapping collaborative knowledge production in China using patent co-inventorships , 2011, Scientometrics.

[8]  Hirotaka Kawashima,et al.  Accuracy evaluation of Scopus Author ID based on the largest funding database in Japan , 2015, Scientometrics.

[9]  Grit Laudel,et al.  Studying the brain drain: Can bibliometric methods help? , 2003, Scientometrics.

[10]  L. Fleming.  Recombinant Uncertainty in Technological Search Lee Fleming , 2001 .

[11]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Bibliometric methods for detecting and analysing emerging research topics , 2012 .

[12]  Louise Ackers,et al.  Moving People and Knowledge: Scientific Mobility in the European Union1 , 2005 .

[13]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. , 2005, 0911.4299.

[14]  M. Polanyi.  The Republic of science , 1962 .

[15]  V. Costigliola.  Mobility of medical doctors in cross-border healthcare , 2011, EPMA Journal.

[16]  Carolin Michels,et al.  Scientific mobility: An analysis of Germany, Austria, France and Great Britain , 2014 .

[17]  Holger Schwechheimer,et al.  Institutionenkodierung als Grundlage für bibliometrische Indikatoren , 2014 .

[18]  Grit Laudel.  Collaboration and reward What do we measure by co-authorships ? , 2002 .

[19]  G. Laudel.  What do we measure by co-authorships? , 2002 .

[20]  Jochen Gläser,et al.  What Internet Use Does and Does Not Change in Scientific Communities , 2003 .

[21]  L. Zucker,et al.  Minerva Unbound: Knowledge Stocks, Knowledge Flows and New Knowledge Production , 2006 .

[22]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[23]  Grit Laudel,et al.  Collaboration, creativity and rewards: why and how scientists collaborate , 2001, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[24]  M. Polanyi.  The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory , 1962 .

[25]  Robert J. W. Tijssen,et al.  Chinese researchers returning home: Impacts of international mobility on research collaboration and scientific productivity , 2008, Scientometrics.

[26]  Valeria Aman.  Does the Scopus author ID suffice to track scientific international mobility? A case study based on Leibniz laureates , 2018, Scientometrics.

[27]  Olle Persson,et al.  The measurement of international scientific collaboration , 1993, Scientometrics.

[28]  Javier Otamendi,et al.  Measuring and assessing researcher mobility from CV analysis: the case of the Ramón y Cajal programme in Spain , 2008 .

[29]  Louise Ackers,et al.  Internationalisation, Mobility and Metrics: A New Form of Indirect Discrimination? , 2008 .

[30]  Branco Ponomariov,et al.  What is co-authorship? , 2016, Scientometrics.

[31]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Studying scientific migration in Scopus , 2013, Scientometrics.

[32]  Jochen Glaser.  Wissenschaftliche Produktionsgemeinschaften: die soziale ordnung der forschung [Scientific Production Communities. The Social Order of Research] , 2006 .