ROC Analysis of Statistical Methods Used in Functional MRI: Individual Subjects

The complicated structure of fMRI signals and associated noise sources make it difficult to assess the validity of various steps involved in the statistical analysis of brain activation. Most methods used for fMRI analysis assume that observations are independent and that the noise can be treated as white gaussian noise. These assumptions are usually not true but it is difficult to assess how severely these assumptions are violated and what are their practical consequences. In this study a direct comparison is made between the power of various analytical methods used to detect activations, without reference to estimates of statistical significance. The statistics used in fMRI are treated as metrics designed to detect activations and are not interpreted probabilistically. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) method is used to compare the efficacy of various steps in calculating an activation map in the study of a single subject based on optimizing the ratio of the number of detected activations to the number of false-positive findings. The main findings are as follows: Preprocessing. The removal of intensity drifts and high-pass filtering applied on the voxel time-course level is beneficial to the efficacy of analysis. Temporal normalization of the global image intensity, smoothing in the temporal domain, and low-pass filtering do not improve power of analysis. Choices of statistics. the cross-correlation coefficient and t-statistic, as well as nonparametric Mann-Whitney statistics, prove to be the most effective and are similar in performance, by our criterion. Task design. the proper design of task protocols is shown to be crucial. In an alternating block design the optimal block length is be approximately 18 s. Spatial clustering. an initial spatial smoothing of images is more efficient than cluster filtering of the statistical parametric activation maps.

[1]  Jack L. Lancaster,et al.  Clustered pixels analysis for functional MRI activation studies of the human brain , 1995 .

[2]  J Xiong,et al.  Assessment and optimization of functional MRI analyses , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[3]  M. Hallett Human Brain Function , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  E. DeYoe,et al.  Reduction of physiological fluctuations in fMRI using digital filters , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[6]  J A Swets,et al.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. , 1988, Science.

[7]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Statistical Analysis for CBF Activation Studies in Human Brain , 1992, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[8]  C. Metz Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[9]  D N Levin,et al.  Hemodynamically independent analysis of cerebrospinal fluid and brain motion observed with dynamic phase contrast MRI , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  J. Frahm,et al.  Dynamic MR imaging of human brain oxygenation during rest and photic stimulation , 1992, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Estimating Smoothness in Statistical Parametric Maps: Variability of p Values , 1995, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Detecting Activations in PET and fMRI: Levels of Inference and Power , 1996, NeuroImage.

[13]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Functional brain mapping by blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison of signal characteristics with a biophysical model. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[14]  N C Andreasen,et al.  Tests for Comparing Images Based on Randomization and Permutation Methods , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[15]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Statistical methods of estimation and inference for functional MR image analysis , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Human Brain Function , 1997 .

[17]  E C Wong,et al.  Processing strategies for time‐course data sets in functional mri of the human brain , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  J A Sorenson,et al.  ROC methods for evaluation of fMRI techniques , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  J C Gore,et al.  An roc approach for evaluating functional brain mr imaging and postprocessing protocols , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  Assessment of the validity of fMRI activation's using blank runs and the randomization of image order , 1996, NeuroImage.

[21]  Bernard Mazoyer,et al.  Cluster analysis in individual functional brain images: Some new techniques to enhance the sensitivity of activation detection methods , 1994 .

[22]  J B Poline,et al.  Enhanced Detection in Brain Activation Maps Using a Multifiltering Approach , 1994, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[23]  A. Anderson,et al.  A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of tic suppression in Tourette syndrome. , 1998, Archives of general psychiatry.

[24]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[25]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  Functional MR imaging of regional brain responses to pleasant and unpleasant odors. , 1998, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.